**From:** Fred Balistreri (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Fri Mar 17 2000 - 12:30:57 PST

**Next message:**Mayer, Mike: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Bad IBIS models!"**Previous message:**Adrian Shiner: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Bad IBIS models! - Business thoughts"**In reply to:**amit agrawal: "Re: [SI-LIST] : A basic question"

In the equation sqrt LC, the C is assumed to be total C, fringe included.

If the methods used do not compute fringe then the methods are at

fault not the equation.

Best Regards,

amit agrawal wrote:

*> In ideal situation, the progation delay is strictly dependent on Er. The
*

*> proagation delay is given by
*

*>
*

*> tau = sqrt(Er)/30 ns/cm
*

*>
*

*> This is also equal to sqrt (LC)(Note: this condition is true only when C
*

*> does not include the fringe field effect)
*

*>
*

*> When we use any EM tool to calculate the transmission line L and C per unit
*

*> length, the capacitance may include the fringe field effect. In that case,
*

*> the effective propagation delay is always more than the ideal propagation
*

*> delay.
*

*>
*

*> tau(effective) = tau(ideal) + delta due to fringe-field
*

*>
*

*> The fringe field effect can vary with the geometry of the line.
*

*>
*

*> In reference to characteristic impedance, the ideal characteristic impedance
*

*> is sqrt (L/C), where C is fringe-field-free. This can also be expressed in
*

*> terms of ideal propagation delay as
*

*>
*

*> Zo (ideal) = tau (ideal)/C
*

*>
*

*> C depends on the geometry of the line for a given Er.
*

*>
*

*> Thus, if the Er is fixed, the capacitance and impedance can be changed by
*

*> changing the geometry of the line.
*

*>
*

*> The capacitance, C calculated from EM tools is not fringe-field-free, hence
*

*> the characteristic impedance is no longer ideal> we can refer it as
*

*> Zo(effective). Note that Zo(effective) will always be smaller than the
*

*> Zo(ideal).
*

*>
*

*> I hope this should answer your question.
*

*>
*

*> Amit Agrawal
*

*> Lightsand Communications
*

*>
*

*> >From: "Peterson, James F (FL51)" <[email protected]>
*

*> >Reply-To: [email protected]
*

*> >To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
*

*> >Subject: [SI-LIST] : A basic question
*

*> >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:00:49 -0500
*

*> >
*

*> >SI List:
*

*> >
*

*> >I have a question about the relationship between Z and Pd (prop. delay).
*

*> >The
*

*> >equations used for these two are :
*

*> >Z=(L/C)^(1/2)
*

*> >and
*

*> >Pd=(LC)^(1/2)
*

*> >I guess my question has to do with Pd. How can we equate Pd to both the
*

*> >above equation and the fact that the speed of light is C/((er)1/2)? Which
*

*> >says that prop. delay is just a function of the dielectric constant (or the
*

*> >material that light is propagating through).
*

*> >Can I really reduce C, without increasing L, and thus reduce the Pd of an
*

*> >interconnect? If I can't then the Pd=(LC)^(1/2) has problems. If I can then
*

*> >how does it align with light's speed being just a function of the medium
*

*> >it's traveling through?
*

*> >
*

*> >regards,
*

*> >Jim
*

*> >
*

*> >**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
*

*> >[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
*

*> >si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> >si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> >****
*

*> >
*

*>
*

*> ______________________________________________________
*

*> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
*

*>
*

*> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> ****
*

-- Fred Balistreri [email protected]**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****

**Next message:**Mayer, Mike: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Bad IBIS models!"**Previous message:**Adrian Shiner: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Bad IBIS models! - Business thoughts"**In reply to:**amit agrawal: "Re: [SI-LIST] : A basic question"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:35:44 PDT
*