Re: [SI-LIST] : Differential Clock Signal Pair

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: S. Weir (weirsp@atdial.net)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 15:17:36 PDT


Jim,

How do you propose to get the differential coupling much above 15% so as to
make the differential coupling dominant over the single-ended coupling?

I agree with your point that it is delay matching that we want, but I think
that with certain reasonably valid assumptions, Lee's assertion that
matched length realizes matched delay holds. Given that it would be very
naive to either mix a stripline and microstrip, or use unequal single-ended
impedances on the pair, aside from etching tolerances, the velocities will
be equal.

Regards,

Steve.
At 02:00 PM 5/19/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>You need to generalize length matching to flight time matching for this
>to
>be true. If two differential signals have matched length but differ
>only
>in their spacings to the ground plane which is their signal return plane
>then
>the two signals will have different propagation velocities and hence
>different flight times even though their physical lengths are matched.
>
>The easiest way to match the propagation velocities is to have the two
>signals tightly coupled.
>
>The tight coupling will dominate over the coupling to other conductors
>in the PCB. So this dominate tight coupling will determine the
>propagation
>velocity instead of the coupling to other conductors. The dominate
>tight
>coupling is inherently balanced between the two signals, hence the
>propagation velocities are inherently balanced. The same cannot be said
>for
>two independently routed signals.
>
>Also the variations in the PCB will usually affect both signals equally
>and
>hence equally affect their propagation velocities.
>
>Jim
>
>Ritchey Lee wrote:
> >
> > Differential signalling doesn't by definition, or any other rule, depend on
> > tight coupling for proper operation. Length matching is the only
> parameter that
> > really counts. Sure, you need to make sure that noise doesn't couple
> into the
> > pair differentially. Sid by side routing does not guarantee that on a
> PCB. On
> > the contrary, side by side routing in a PCB will aslways result in
> differential
> > noise coupling.
> >
> > Common mode noise coupling only occurs when the field strength of the
> inducing
> > signal is the same in both wires. This cannot occur in a PCB when the
> inducer
> > is on the same layer as the pair.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > Weston Beal wrote:
> >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > By definition, differential signals should be tightly coupled. This
> implies
> > > close spacing. This does not necessarily mean that the seperation
> should be
> > > minimized. You need to do some analysis to decide the stackup,
> width, and
> > > space that creates the differential impedance that is correct for your
> > > design.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Weston
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> > > [mailto:owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of Brian Seol
> > > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:38 AM
> > > To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> > > Subject: [SI-LIST] : Differential Clock Signal Pair
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I have a simple question about trace layout design for a differential
> clock
> > > signal pair of high-speed CMOS memory packages. I have two design
> > > guidelines for that as follows:
> > >
> > > 1. SPACING between a differential clock signal trace pair must be
> > > MINIMIZED as well as matched in length in order to reduce noise.
> > >
> > > 2. Differential clock signal trace pair must be matched in length in
> order
> > > to achieve matched electrical characteristics, but SPACING between
> > > them must be MAXIMIZED in order to reduce crosstalk noise.
> > >
> > > Which do you prefer?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > >
> > > Brian
>
>**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
>majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
>si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
>si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:25 PST