Zip Cord Transmission Lines and Baluns An Analysis of a Low Cost Speaker Wire with
Common Mode Chokes as a High Frequency Transmission
Line
by Dr. Carol F. Milazzo, KP4MD (posted 25 September 2010)
|
![]() |
DECREASING FEED LINE LOSS - 04 December 2010
Originally, a 40 foot roll of 24AWG speaker wire (Figure
1) was used as the transmission line. Its
theoretical calculated DC resistance was compared to its
measured resistance. The loop antenna was made of
CTI-20 gauge stranded wire with a resistance specification
of 8.63 ohms per 1000 feet, and typical 24 gauge stranded
copper wire (7/32) is listed as 23.3 ohms per 1000 feet.
The calculated total DC resistance at the transmitter end
of the 40 foot 24 gauge zip cord feed line attached to the
loop antenna would be (140'/1000' x 8.63) + (80'/1000' x
23.3) or 3.1 ohms. The actual measured DC resistance was
7.7 ohms! I confirmed this after taking down the 40
foot zip cord feed line, twisting the wires at the far end
together and measuring 6.2 ohms for the entire 80 foot
length of wire. This raised my concern for I2R
losses. A 100 watt transmission to approximately 100 ohm
impedance would produce radio frequency currents on the
order of one ampere, and approximately 6 watts of the
power would be wasted as heat in the feed line. For this
reason, I replaced the 24 gauge speaker wire with 36 feet
(11 m) of Pfanstiehl
18-gauge AS-18/50Z speaker wire (Figure 2). An MFJ-202B RX noise
bridge was used to measure this zip cord's
characteristic impedance, velocity factor, and matched
line attenuation listed in Table 1 and in the Transmission
Lines Details program plots in Figures 3 through 5.5
The attenuation of the 36 foot feed line was then 1.5 dB
at 7 MHz (comparable to RG-174/U at 1/3 of the cost) with
a total measured antenna system DC resistance of 2.5 ohms
with only 1 ohm due to feed line resistance.
The speaker wire performed most satisfactorily with low standing wave ratios on frequencies
14 MHz and below. It exhibited increasing loss above 14 MHz and significant dielectric loss at high standing wave ratios. |
|
|
Figure
1. Original Feed Line Uninex 24AWG Speaker Wire |
Figure
2. Replacement - Pfanstiehl 18AWG AS-18/50Z Speaker Wire |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure
3. Characteristic impedance Z0 vs.
frequency |
Figure 4. Velocity factor
vs. frequency |
Figure
5. Attenuation vs. frequency |
---|
AS-18/50Z Speaker Wire
Attenuation vs. Frequency Z0=105Ω VF=0.69 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency MHz |
1.8 |
3.5 |
5.3 |
7 |
10.1 |
14 |
18.1 |
21 |
24.9 |
28 |
50 |
Attenuation dB/35' | 0.7 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.9 |
Attenuation dB/100' |
2.1 |
2.9 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
5.0 |
5.9 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
7.8 |
8.3 |
11.1 |
IMPROVING BALUN PERFORMANCEA commercially available 4:1 voltage balun (Figure 6) was originally used for the transition between the 50 ohm coaxial cable and the balanced speaker wire transmission line. Lewallen6 and others have criticized the 4:1 Ruthroff (voltage) baluns7 commonly included in commercially produced antenna tuning units as being excessively lossy at high standing wave ratios and susceptible to common mode radio frequency noise. (Voltage baluns present these problems increasingly as an antenna is operated away from its resonant frequency and is in an asymmetrical environment that renders it an unbalanced load). After a 10 minute contact on 18 MHz CW running 100 watts output power into the 40 meter full wave loop, my 4:1 voltage balun felt quite hot to the touch. In "Baluns and Tuners"8 Ehrenfried compared and documented the thermal power losses in various baluns (Figure 7). Also, while using the voltage balun, shorting both sides of the balanced feed line together did not quiet the receiver as expected. A significant level of radio signals and noise were heard, representing common mode signal pickup on the feed line and conversely implying radiation from the feed line. |
|
|
Figure 6. Original
Balun Lossy 4:1 Ruthroff (voltage) balun |
Figure 7. Thermal
loss in voltage balun (from "Baluns and Tuners," Ehrenfried) |
---|
Figure 37 in reference
1 shows the feed point impedance variation between 80 and 350
ohms at the resonance frequencies of 7, 14, 21 and 28 MHz,
presenting corresponding VSWRs of 1.3:1 to 3:1 to the 114 ohm
zip cord. 4:1 impedance transformation at that point would
increase the VSWR to 5.7:1 at 7 MHz; therefore no impedance
transformation in needed at the feed point. Neither is a
balun needed as both the antenna and zip cord are
balanced. Therefore, a simple common mode choke is used
there to reduce common mode radiation and noise. Likewise,
figure 54 in reference
1 shows the impedance at resonance
frequencies measured at the transmitter end of the 51 foot
transmission line varying between 45 and 120 ohms. Therefore, a simple common mode
choke would serve to reduce common mode noise and to transition
the unbalanced antenna tuning unit (ATU) to the balanced zip
cord, leaving the ATU to perform the impedance transformation to
the 50 ohm radio.
Since common mode noise and feed line radiation were such a
"pain in the derrière", I used an appropriate disposable
4" x 6" x 2" hinged plastic container to make a box (Fig. 8 and
12) for testing different baluns, with a dual binding post mounted
on one end and an SO-239 female UHF receptacle on the other.
(Given the source of the box, I named it the "H Special"—"H" for
the Henry unit of inductance, of course!) The baluns under
test would be attached to the connectors with alligator
clips. At first, I tested the 1:1 ferrite rod current balun
made previously. As superior common mode noise rejection was
observed with the toroid core baluns, no further measurements with
the ferrite rod balun were made. Then, at a local electronics
dealer, I purchased some unmarked surplus ferrite toroid cores
($.85 each) that were identified as 43 ferrite mix with the use of
an MFJ-202B noise bridge. To make a 1:1 toroid current balun
using coaxial cable, I stacked two FT114-43 toroid cores and wound
10 turns of RG-174/U 50 ohm cable through them (Figs. 10 and
11). The inductance of this balun was approximately 200 µH
as measured at series resonance (1642 kHz) with a 47 pF
capacitor. The actual common mode impedance of all
constructed common mode chokes varied with frequency as shown in
Table 2 and Figures 19 through 21.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 turns of RG-174/U on 2 FT-114-43 cores |
|
---|
Although I did not use a 4:1 current balun in the final configuration
(due to its elsewhere documented inferior common mode rejection),
figures 13 through 17 show the construction of a 4:1 Guanella
balun similar to a
design by Green12. This consisted of two
1:1 current baluns on FT140-43 toroid cores connected as shown in
Figs. 13 through 17. For these, I wound 36" lengths of the
18 gauge speaker wire on each of 2 FT140-43 toroid cores.
The inductance of these chokes was 100 µH when measured in series
resonance (2320 kHz) with a 47 pF capacitor. I subsequently
measured 105 µH inductance and 1.5 pF parasitic capacitance with a
vector network analyzer.
Finally, I wound 11 turns (16 inches) of 18 gauge speaker wire on
each of three FT114-43 toroid cores. The inductance of these
chokes was approximately 60 µH when measured in series resonance
(3000 kHz) with a 47 pF capacitor. On 23 January 2011 one of
these chokes (shown in Fig. 18 and as T1 in Fig. 22) was wound on
the feed line 3 inches below the antenna feed point and another
one (T2 in Fig. 22) was wound where the feed line entered through
the station window to help suppress common mode currents caused by
asymmetry of the antenna environment. These feed line chokes
might adversely affect the use of the feed line and loop as a top
loaded vertical antenna; however, this was not considered a
significant loss due to the poor performance of the antenna in
that mode. The third choke (T3 in Fig. 22) was used as a 1:1
current balun for comparison with other baluns in the balun
test box.
|
|
|
|
|
speaker wire on two FT140-43 toroid cores |
---|
The MFJ-202B noise bridge has a greater range than the antenna analyzer and was used for further impedance measurements. The noise bridge was calibrated5 to increase the accuracy of measurements. Table 2 lists the common mode impedance of each toroid choke over the frequency range 1.8 through 28 MHz. Above 1.8 MHz all measured impedances exceeded 1000 ohms.
MHz |
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures 19 through 21 plot the common mode choke impedances graphically.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fig. 20. Parallel line FT114-43 choke impedance vs. freq. | Fig. 21. Parallel line FT140-43 choke impedance vs. freq. |
---|
The MFJ-202B noise bridge was then used to measure impedance through either of the 1:1 baluns or 4:1 balun with the other end connected to the 37' feed line and loop antenna. The standing wave ratios were calculated with reference to a 50 ohm source. The results are listed in Table 3.
MHz |
|
|
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
|
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
|
ohms |
ohms |
ohms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impedance measurements varied in a complex manner as expected
with changes in frequency and transmission line length. The feed
line was ultimately lengthened to 51 feet (an electrical 1/2
wavelength at 7 MHz) to improve impedance matching on all desired
frequencies (see 40 Meter Loop
Antenna Transmission Line Optimization for 80 Meters and WARC
Bands). None of the current baluns heated perceptibly with
100 watts transmitted power on any frequency.
Figure 22 shows the present station antenna configuration.
With 1:1 common mode chokes at the antenna feed point and on the
output of the antenna tuning unit and the total transmission line
length adjusted to 51 feet, that is, 1/2 electrical wavelength at
7 MHz, the impedance presented was well within the range of the
antenna tuning unit on all frequencies 3.5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21, 24
and 28 MHz.
Many thanks to Dan Maguire for the Transmission Line Details
program.
|
![]() Fig. 22. The station configuration updated in 2013. The radio is connected through RG-58/U coaxial cable jumpers to an automatic antenna tuning unit (currently an LDG Z-11 ProII) and a 1:1 Guanella current balun (T3). A total of 4 feet (1.2 m) of the AS-18/50Z speaker wire are wound on the the toroid cores (T1, T2 and T3) for an approximate 51 feet (15.5 m) of total transmission line length of speaker wire to the full wave 40 meter horizontal loop antenna. |
---|