↳ ↑ Radio Wave Propagation Models

This page is part of the project "Understanding HF Propagation."
by Doron Tal, 4X4XM

Radio propagation models are mathematical algorithms that simulate radio wave behavior in different environments, accounting for factors like obstacles, distance, and signal frequency. They offer key insights into real-world radio wave transmission and reception.

Radio waves can travel in different ways between a transmitter and a receiver.

Multipath propagation
Figure 1: Radio Wave Propagation Phenomena based on Ratel's presentation ↗

The History of HF Propagation Models

The history of High Frequency (HF) propagation models began with the discovery of the ionosphere in the early 20th century and has evolved from basic empirical rules to sophisticated computer simulations that account for complex, variable conditions.

Early days: Empirical understanding (1900s–1950s)

  • Discovery of skywave propagation: Following Guglielmo Marconi's first transatlantic radio signal in 1901, radio operators discovered that HF signals could travel much farther than line-of-sight. By the 1920s, amateur radio operators played a crucial role in documenting that this long-distance "skywave" communication was due to signals reflecting off a layer in the upper atmosphere, later named the ionosphere.
  • Ionospheric sounding: The development of the ionosonde in the 1930s provided a key tool for understanding the ionosphere's properties. This instrument measured the reflection height and critical frequency of radio waves at vertical incidence, supplying fundamental data for creating propagation models.
  • Governmental research: During and after World War II, organizations like the U.S. National Bureau of Standards (NBS) formalized propagation prediction, which was critical for military and international shortwave broadcasting. The NBS Central Radio Propagation Laboratory published detailed Ionospheric Predictions, allowing operators to calculate the best frequencies for long-distance transmissions.

Rise of computational models (1960s–1980s)

  • Computer-aided prediction: As computers became available, the development of software-based prediction tools revolutionized HF modeling. Models were no longer just based on manual charts but could incorporate extensive data sets and complex calculations.
  • VOACAP: The Voice of America Coverage Analysis Program (VOACAP), an evolution of the earlier IONCAP model, became one of the most famous and influential computerized HF prediction tools. Developed in the 1970s and 1980s, these models used statistical data to predict parameters like maximum usable frequency (MUF), lowest usable frequency (LUF), and signal-to-noise ratio over a given path.
  • ITU standards: The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) established standard methods for HF prediction, ensuring consistency across international broadcasting and communication systems. Recommendation ITU-R P.533 formalized a comprehensive method for predicting HF propagation parameters, taking into account solar activity, seasons, and geographic location.

Advancements and modernization (1990s–2010s)

  • Real-time channels: While statistical models like VOACAP predict long-term median conditions, the need for more accurate, real-time data drove new developments. Ionospheric chirpsounders were refined to provide immediate snapshots of propagation conditions over specific paths. This technology allows users to automatically select the best frequency, maximizing communication capacity and reliability.
  • Wideband modeling: The move towards high-speed digital HF communications led to the development of wideband models that account for complex channel effects like time and frequency spreading. These models, developed by researchers and institutions like the U.K. Ministry of Defence and the Canadian Communications Research Centre, are essential for evaluating modern HF systems.
  • Integration of space weather: As understanding of the ionosphere improved, newer models incorporated the effects of space weather events like solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which can cause significant disruptions to HF communication. In 2023, for instance, the Indian Institute of Geomagnetism released an advanced model that predicts the impact of these events on HF signal availability.

Cognitive radio and wave-optics (2010s–present)

  • Cognitive radio and ALE: Modern HF systems now feature Automated Link Establishment (ALE) and cognitive radio technologies. These intelligent radios automatically monitor channels and select the optimal frequency and power levels, removing the need for a human operator with specialized propagation knowledge.
  • Wave-optics methods: The traditional ray-tracing approach to modeling HF propagation can fail to capture complex diffraction and interference effects caused by ionospheric turbulence. Advanced wave-optics methods are being developed to account for the wave nature of HF signals, providing more accurate predictions for rapid fading and other signal degradations.
Era Key developments Models and tools
Early History
(1900–1950s)		 Discovery of ionospheric reflection, empirical charting, and basic ionosonde measurements. Manual prediction charts, NBS Ionospheric Predictions.
Computational Age
(1960–1980s)		 Emergence of software-based statistical models for path prediction. VOACAP (Voice of America Coverage Analysis Program), ITU-R P.533 methods.
Modern Advancements
(1990s–2010s)		 Real-time channel sounding, wideband channel modeling, integration of space weather effects. Ionospheric chirpsounders, wideband HF channel models for digital communications.
Intelligent and Advanced
(2010s–Present)		 Adaptive radio technologies, AI-driven selection, and wave-optics for signal accuracy. Automated Link Establishment (ALE), cognitive HF radio, wave-optics models.

References:

  1. Simmulations that Forecast and Predict HF propagation
    VOACAP, DR2W, HamCap, IOCAP, Proppy, Radcom, Validation of models, Ray-tracing models, Ionospheric models, Space weather models, and more.
  2. ITU, URSI models | IRI model | Neural network model | ITM Processes | Advanced Ionospheric Models
  3. Comparing NET vs. IRI ionospheric models
  4. History of HF communications technology: From forgotten medium to modern communications KNL 2024
  5. History of Communications/Radio Wave Propagation from Marconi to MIMO 2017
  6. HF propagation modeling within the polar ionosphere American Geophysical Union 2012
  7. Real-time specification of HF propagation support based on a global assimilative model of the ionosphere American Geophysical Union 2009
  8. History (Part 1) of HF propagation models by Ray Rosich 1978