RE: [SI-LIST] : ESD Smocks

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Ken Cantrell (Ken.Cantrell@srccomp.com)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:05:42 PST


Yeah, you can't miss anything. It takes a dedicated team to put it
implemented, and another permanent team to monitor the process and make sure
it stays in place.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Nudelman [mailto:mnudelman@tellium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:41 PM
To: Ken Cantrell
Cc: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : ESD Smocks

Ken,

This is what I meant - whatever static dissipative you wear, you should be
able
to drain the charge.
For this you have to have your cuffs buttoned tightly (contact with skin) to
transfer all charge to the fibers, and then at the station to put on the
groundstrap to drain the accumulated charge off the fibers, or stand on
conductive/dissipative floor wearing heelstraps.

Walking in conductive isles without smocks should not be considered a
violation
as long as you stay in the isle.

Smock is only effective as a part of compelx of measures, but not really by
itself.

What I can see - because of different reasons - this complex is not always
in
place.

Ken Cantrell wrote:

> Mike,
> I was on a team that installed this process in a manufacturing environment
a
> number of years ago. Quick overview first:
>
> Gotta have the conductive floor (do the isles only to save money, the
stuff
> is very expensive)
> Gotta have heel straps on your shoes, and wrist straps at the stations.
> Static dissapative foam sheets at all stations where you are assembling,
> disassembling, repairing, etc.
> No one is allowed to walk off of the conductive isles into the
manufacturing
> area without putting on an ESD smock, including engineers. Don't care if
> you designed the box all by yourself and are coming down to respond to a
> work stoppage.
> All parts in the warehouse designated as static sensitive must be marked
> with highly visible label and be enclosed in a static dissapative bag.
The
> parts are placed on static dissapative carts for delivery to the line. It
> goes on, but you get the idea.
> The smocks must be static dissapative, and you have to wear them
correctly.
> Won't do you any good if you don't wear them right. Cuffs must be
buttoned
> with no clothing visible (regardless of material). All buttons except for
> the top button must be buttoned, unless clothing protrudes beyond the last
> button. If it does, button them all, or have the clothing assessed by
your
> ESD person for tribo or other effects.
> And that's just the overview. However, it works if implemented correctly,
> and has measurable impact to the bottom line.
> In design areas, use best judgement, keeping in mind that you can inject
or
> receive a 2kV transient pulse and not feel it, which can cause latent
fails.
> So why static dissapative, and what does that mean? Static dissapative
> material is between an insulator and semiconductive material. It captures
> charge, but dissipates the charge slowly so that radiation does not occur.
> I don't remember the ohms, it's high, but not at insulator levels.
> Conductive material captures charge but discharges it too quickly causing
> radiation. Insulators of course store charge to capacity and wait for an
> unhappy victim to touch or walk too close to them. I always like the
> Goldilocks analogy, and static dissapative is "just right".
> The other big player is humidity. You have to have a controlled humidity
> environment.
>
> Furniture discharge, some say, is worse than human discharge. That's up
for
> debate. Point being, don't ignore it either. Metal cart with parts on it
> touches, or comes near enough to couple to, the metal chair of a co-worker
> or a file cabinet, for example.
> For really unusual stories of transient "force at a distance", attend a
Doug
> Smith seminar. Real live things that happened to Doug that are both funny
> and informative. I won't give it away, but my favorite is the jingling
> change story. All his tall tales are empirically demonstrated/verified at
> the seminar.
> Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> [mailto:owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of Michael Nudelman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:59 AM
> To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> Subject: [SI-LIST] : ESD Smocks
>
> Hail to you, people that know electricity.
>
> I have unrelated to SI question. And this question does not come from my
> ancient animosity to ESD smocks. It comes but from the desire for pure
> knowledge (and some distrust for businesses mongering ESD equipment).
>
> Now, somebody please explain me the principle of the ESD smock's
> operation. It is a gown, laced through by carbon fibers, forming a cage.
> (St. Mike Faraday is smiling in heaven reading this, I'm sure).
>
> As I remember from my Electricity course, any Faraday-cage-like device
> (hollow metal object) is intended to protect inside from outside (a
> static field inside the object is always zero if all the charges are
> outside).
> However any charge that is inside the object, upon touching the inner
> surface will transfer ALL of its charge to the outside surface of the
> object, thus
> itself loosing 100% of the charge and the charge being distributed
> evenly on the outside surface of the object. The object in our case is
> the smock.
>
> BTW, the Van-de-Graaf generator (the one capable of developing few
> million volts potential) works exactly on the same principle.
>
> For the smocks to work we need conductive floors and everybody wearing
> straps. Otherwise, smocks are potentially harmfull. If you touch
> something with it while not grounded, you may actually zap some poor
> unsuspecting FET or a co-worker (unless he deserves it).
>
> (And as I know, lots of companies do not have those floors. And ESD
> businesses do not really insist on them - otherwise they would loose
> some business, admitting, that the smock itself is not the remedy).
>
> Unless there is some gimmick to the smock that I do not know of.
>
> Anybody can explain this ... phenomenon?
>
> Mike.
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:30:30 PDT