RE: [SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest v Hyperlynx

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Ken Cantrell (Ken.Cantrell@srccomp.com)
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 07:47:45 PDT


Dave,

Cadence - SpectraQuest
Mentor - XNS
Innoveda - XTK/HyperLynx
Applied Simulation Technologies
Ansoft
Quantic EMC
Sigrity
are seven places to start. Each has it's strengths and weaknessess,
depending on what you are doing. There aren't any short cuts. You need to
review them and then make a selection.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
[mailto:owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of David Instone
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:19 AM
To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest v Hyperlynx

All,
   Yes I am able to determine when an email comes from a vendor, and
personally I didn't find it any more of an ad than I would have
expected. I am a little surprised than his is the only vendors email,
public or private.
I found Ken's comments on what was missing in SpecctraQuest
enlightening.

So far I have had 2 emails from users on my original question, Kens
comments and the rest of this thread has been on whether Carlos should
have posted as he did. I am no further enlightened than I was a week
ago!
Dave

Ken Cantrell wrote:
>
> All,
> In an attempt not to start another flame war, but to respond to Carlos,
Jim,
> Todd, and Pat....
> Carlos,
> You gave a HUGE sales pitch for your product, in my opinion. The other
> vendors could have ripped you apart, which they didn't, and I applaud them
> for their restraint. Perhaps next time I will let it go, and then you can
> get the barrage of e-mail from them instead of one from me. I didn't have
a
> "bad" salesman just leave my office, or anything else. That is a logically
> weak argument used by someone who has nothing valid to support their
claims.
> And you can't sidestep the issues that I pointed out. Those are all
> weakness of your product. I could list weakness of all the major vendors'
> products, but refrain from doing so until someone pops up with "my product
> is the be all and end all"...which is b.s. as we all know (except for
> engineers new to the field). You put your opinions on the list, you take
> your chances...just like me or anyone else.
> Preacher Jim,
> I don't hold vendors' representatives to a higher standard, just an equal
> standard. Remember the recent H. Johnson debacle? The list looked like a
> shark pool. People were coming out of the wood works to take a shot at
the
> king. But for the most part it was a necessary clarification. Why should
> I, or anyone, hold a vendor representative less accountable with regard to
> accuracy than H.J.? He pretty much started this whole thing (generalizing
> now, I know who all of the first researchers were), and we ripped him
apart
> in the name of science. No kids gloves there. I think that it is
> inapproriate when a posting diverges from data, to opinion, to sales
pitch,
> especially to someone new to the discipline. That's my opinion, and the
> last I remember, I'm entitled to an opinion also. My intent was to
clarify
> for David I. that he needed to research the vendors' offerings, and that
> Cadence might not be the best choice for his application. All that
glitters
> is not gold. My concern is for the SI engineer, and not the vendors. I am
> neither for nor against the vendors. I am impartial. Can you say the same?
> The one that makes the best tool set for my application, and has the best
> correspondence to emprical data is the one that I choose to use. You will
> also note that due to my last round with one of the vendors, their replies
> have been data points and not sales campaigns. Keep that in mind. End of
> sermon.
> Todd,(thanks for an actual question)
> No. I mean on the interconnects. You have to use a 3-D solver to model the
> pins and cabling. Otherwise you put in your best guess from the vendor
data
> or perform measurements, and use those values. The last time I checked,
> SpectraQuest didn't have that capability. If you have updated data, I
would
> appreciate receiving it.
> Pat,
> You have a good point; overstated to make your point. I just went from
> somone expressing what I think is a valid opinion, to someone who is
> suppressing knowledge. That's a pretty big step. So perhaps, Patrick,
you
> also overstated your position. It's not suppressing knowledge, it's
having
> the posting contain some knowledge to be transferred. As I remember, you
> went through a round or two over the plane bridging/frequency independance
> of capacitor selection. You took some hits, but we all learned something
on
> that one. No big deal. Part of the learning process. I guess we differ
on
> this current issue as to whether or not there was any content in the
> message, and whether or not we hold vendor representatives to the same
> standard that we hold ourselves to.
>
> For everyone's information, I have received several e-mails in support of
my
> position. There were a number of people who found Carlos's e-mail too far
> from fact, and very much Cadence biased. I still feel that this is not a
> sales forum, and will express my opinion when such instances occur,
knowing
> that there will be other and opposite opinions. That's what the list is
> about. I hope that David finds the discussion illuminating rather than
> confusing, which was my intent.
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Moll [mailto:cmoll@cadence.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:25 AM
> To: Ken Cantrell; Carlos Moll; David Instone; si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest v Hyperlynx
>
> Ken:
>
> It looks like you may had a bad experience with one of your tool
> vendors!!... My inputs to any thread in the SI list are basically
> unbiased. I am a not a sales person and by know means promote the sales
of
> our solution on this list.
>
> If you are unhappy at my post, then you should address this to me
> personally and not to the entire SI list. As tool vendors we are out
> there to help you and everyone else, and I/we certainly get useful data as
> what direction and technology enhancements we need to incorporate into our
> tools or what typical problems are warranting attention from users such as
> yourself or the folks of the SI list.
>
> You will get biased opinions from the users on this list as to which tool
> vendor works best, and that's great. However, I encourage that any
> negative comments or problems that are associated with your tool vendor
are
> addressed to the tool vendor or your support person directly, not the SI
> list.
>
> Any comments you can email me directly and I will send you my phone number
> and discuss any technical issues or just to answer all of you questions.
>
> Carlos Moll
> Cadence Design Systems
>
> At 04:19 PM 5/14/2001 -0600, Ken Cantrell wrote:
> >Carlos,
> >Do you have 3D-solvers yet? Or are still having the SI engineer put in
> >"typical" values on the interconnects? How about common and differential
> >mode emissions? Last I heard from one of your hitters on the east coast
> was
> >that you only had differential? Has that changed?
> >Have you ever used HyperLynx? If you haven't, you don't have the right
to
> >comment on HyperLynx, or XTK, or XNS, or any vendor's software that you
> >haven't personally done a board with.
> >Please respond off-line from the SI list as I don't think I could take
> >another "unbiased point of view" from you on the list.
> >David,
> >Beware of salesmen bearing gifts. Cadence makes as good a package as
any,
> >and better than most, but that has little bearing on what you need for
your
> >application. You need to pick one or more from the many qualified
> >simulation vendors. The list is long, the competition is, for lack of a
> >better word, brutal. So take the promises with a grain of salt, review
the
> >packages yourself, and pick the one that best suites your needs.
> >Ken
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> >[mailto:owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of Carlos Moll
> >Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:20 AM
> >To: David Instone; si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> >Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest v Hyperlynx
> >
> >
> >David:
> >
> > From a non-biased point of view...
> >
> >If you were to compare your requirements related to bit pattern error
> >detection or ISI, comprehensive waveform editing capabilities,
differential
> >support, coupling of connectors/package ball I/O's, mutli board and
package
> >to board ,etc. system level simulations , then you should at a minimum be
> >looking at a comparison between SpecctraQuest and XTK, not Hyperlynx.
> >
> > From a biased point of view...
> >
> >If you use Capture and Allegro as your standardized flow, then the
> >SpecctraQuest integration to your flow will provide you with the most
> >powerful and comprehensive SI solution!!
> >
> >If you need me to further elaborate on such differentiations and why ,
then
> >you can email me directly at cmoll@cadence.com.
> >
> >Carlos Moll
> >Cadence Design Systems
> >
> >
> > At 10:15 AM 5/11/2001 +0100, David Instone wrote:
> >Dear Group,
> > In addition to all the 'normal' things the above are used for, given
> >the need to simulate differential pcb traces and the connectors,drivers
> >and receivers associated with them at rates upto 4 gigabaud, which of
> >the above would you prefer to use?
> >
> >I also want to be able to display the resulting eye pattern and/or
> >calculated the resulting DJ from Inter Symbol Interference (ISI).
> >Naturally I would want to be able to read in board designs (we use
> >Cadence/allegro for pcb layout and Orcad for schematics) and it would
> >be nice if it would run 'stand alone' on a Labtop while on-the-road.
> >
> >--
> >Regards
> >
> >Dave Instone. Compliance Engineer
> > Storage Systems Development, MP24/22
> > Xyratex, Langstone Rd., Havant, Hampshire, P09 1SA, UK.
> >Tel: +44 (0)23-92-496862 (direct line)
> >Fax: +44 (0)23-92-496014
> >http://www.xyratex.com Tel: +44 (0)23-92-496000
> >
> >**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> >majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> >si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> >si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >****
> >
> >
> >**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> >majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> >si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> >si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >****

--
Regards

Dave Instone. Compliance Engineer Storage Systems Development, MP24/22 Xyratex, Langstone Rd., Havant, Hampshire, P09 1SA, UK. Tel: +44 (0)23-92-496862 (direct line) Fax: +44 (0)23-92-496014 http://www.xyratex.com Tel: +44 (0)23-92-496000

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:12:01 PDT