Phased Array Antennas
Iulian Rosu, YO3DAC / VA3IUL,
http://www.qsl.net/va3iul
pdf version
-
-
Introduction
-
-
Main Characteristics of Array Antennas
-
-
Array Antenna Field Regions
-
-
Techniques to increase the Antenna Gain and change the Radiation Pattern
-
-
Phased Array Antennas
-
-
Array Antenna Elements
-
-
Patch Antenna Elements in a Phase Array
-
-
Slot Antenna Elements in a Phased Array
-
-
Hertzian Dipole Array Antennas
-
-
Array Antenna Radiation Patterns
-
-
Array Factor (AF)
-
-
Array Antenna Patterns
–
Broadside (Boresight) and End-fire
-
-
Phased Array Antenna Beamforming
-
-
Array Antenna
Scanned Beam (Beam Steering)
-
-
Grating Lobes of Phased Array Antenna
-
-
The Ordinary End-fire Array
-
-
Thinned Phased Array Antenna
-
-
Nonuniformly Spaced Array Antennas
-
-
Mutual Coupling between Antenna Elements
-
-
Frequency Bandwidth of Array Antenna
-
-
Antenna Element Failure Analysis
-
-
Scan Blindness
-
-
Array Factor plots for Phased Array Antennas
-
-
Sparse Array Antennas
-
-
Phase Shifters used in Electronically Controlled Phased Array Antennas
Introduction
First
Antenna
was invented and built in 1888 by
Heinrich Hertz
in his experiments to
prove the existence of waves predicted by the electromagnetic theory of
James C. Maxwell
.
The name Antenna was coined by
Guglielmo Marconi
in 1895, and is coming from
the Latin name
ANTEMNA
, which is the pole on a mast, from which ship sails are set.
-
•
Antenna
can be seen as the interface between the radio waves which are
propagating through free space and electric currents moving in metal conductors.
-
•
A radio
transmitter
supplies an electric current to the antenna's terminals, and the
antenna radiates the energy from the current as
electromagnetic waves
(also
named
radio waves
).
-
•
In a radio
receiver
, an antenna intercepts some of the power of the transmitted radio
waves in order to produce an electric current at its terminals, that is applied to the
input of the receiver to be amplified.
Antennas are essential components of ALL radio equipment
Main Characteristics of Array Antennas
Is a graphical representation (or mathematical function) of the radiation properties of
an antenna as a function of geometric (typically spherical) coordinates.
If that particular direction is not specified, then the direction in which maximum
intensity is observed, can be taken as the directivity of that antenna.
-
-
The directivity of a non-isotropic antenna is equal to the ratio of the radiation
intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity of the isotropic source.
-
-
Antenna Array
directivity
is the measure of how concentrated the antenna gain is
in a given direction relative to an isotropic radiator. It follows a 10*log(N)
relationship, where N is the number of elements in the array.
-
-
The
Directivity Resolution
of an antenna (Rayleigh resolution) may be defined as
equal to half the beamwidth between first nulls (
FNBW / 2
).
For example, an antenna whose pattern (
First Null Beamwidth
) FNBW / 2 = 2°
has a resolution of 1°, so the antenna may distinguish between two adjacent
geostationary orbit satellites separated by 1°.
Effective area (aperture)
A
e
of an antenna represents the ratio of the available power
at the terminals of the antenna to the power flux density from a plane wave incident
normal to the antenna. The effective area is related to the antenna directivity
D
:
A
e
= (λ
2
*D)/4π
e
a
= A
e
/A
phys
(0 <
e
a
< 1)
-
-
An antenna has an aperture through which the power is radiated. This radiation
should be effective with minimum losses. The physical area of the aperture should
also be taken into consideration, as the effectiveness of the radiation depends
upon the area of the aperture, physically on the antenna.
-
•
Antenna Efficiency
-
-
Antenna Efficiency
is the ratio of the radiated power of the antenna to the input
power accepted by the antenna.
-
-
The Antenna Efficiency has to do only with ohmic losses in the antenna.
In transmitting antenna, these losses involve power fed to the antenna which is not
radiated but heats the antenna structure,
-
-
Antenna should radiate the power given at its input, with minimum losses.
-
-
A
lossless antenna
is an antenna with an antenna efficiency of 0dB (or 100%).
-
•
Gain
-
-
Antenna Gain
is the product of the
Efficiency
and the
Directivity
of an antenna.
G = k*D
where k (dimensionless) is the
efficiency factor
(0 ≤ k ≤ 1)
-
-
If the
antenna efficiency
is not 100%, the
Gain
is less than the
Directivity
.
-
-
Gain is usually measured in dB. Unlike antenna directivity,
antenna gain
takes
into account the losses that occur, and hence focuses on the antenna efficiency.
-
-
Gain of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation intensity in a given direction to the
radiation intensity that would be obtained if the power accepted by the antenna
were radiated in all directions (isotropically).
-
-
Array Antenna Gain
equals 10*log(N), plus the embedded
element gain
(
G
e
),
minus the ohmic and scan losses (
N
is the number of elements in the array):
Array Antenna Gain = 10*log(N) + G
e
–
Loss
OHMIC
–
Loss
SCAN
-
-
As defined, the gain does not include losses from impedance mismatches.
-
-
The "
Realized Gain
" considers the impedance mismatch and is therefore relative
to the power matched to the transmission line.
-
-
The
realized gain depends on the impedance matching of the network.
Since mismatch will result in additional losses,
realized gain
is smaller than
gain
.
The
gain
in return is smaller than the
directivity
due to the radiation efficiency.
-
•
Only for an ideal lossless antenna and perfect matching can the three parameters
(directivity, gain, realized gain) be theoretically equal.
The total amount of energy radiated from a transmitting antenna can be measured in
terms of a
Radiation Resistance
which is the resistance that, when replacing the
antenna, at the feeder will consume the same amount of power that is radiated.
The angular separation between two identical points on opposite sides of the
maximum of the radiation pattern.
Generally, the value definition is the half-power (3dB) point (HPBW).
Indicates the time-varying direction of the
electric field vector
–
vertical, horizontal,
and circular polarization are typical.
-
-
Linear polarizations are defined as vertical, horizontal or slanted, while circular
polarizations can rotate right or left (in the right-hand sense or left-hand sense).
The frequencies for which matching is acceptable (e.g. VSWR less than 2), define the
antenna bandwidth.
-
-
Depending on the useable frequencies, the bandwidth is the factor between the
lowest (
f
L
) and highest frequency (
f
H
):
BW = f
H
/ f
L
Antennas are defined as broadband when the factor is equal to or greater than 2.
The ratio of voltage to current at the input terminals of the antenna.
Array Antenna Field Regions
When a high frequency current flows in an antenna, it generates a high frequency
electromagnetic field in the surrounding space. The surrounding space of an antenna is
usually subdivided (classified) into three regions: the
reactive near-field
region, the
radiating near-field
(Fresnel) region and the
far-field
(Fraunhofer) region.
These regions are useful to identify the field structure to know which simplification can be
applied, but there is no precise boundary nor abrupt change in the field configuration.
Even if antenna regions were predicted years before (wave-zones mentioned by
Braun
),
first author who published about regions around the antenna was
Schelkunoff
in the mid
1930’s
, followed later by
Friis
and
Kraus
. Was mentioned that the space around an antenna
may be separated into two regions: one next to the antenna known as the
“
antenna
region
”
and one outside the antenna, known as the
“
outer region
”
. The boundary
between the two regions (which is a sphere whose center is at the middle of the antenna)
may be arbitrary taken to be at a radius
R
.
This distance
R
varies from one type of antenna
to another. For electrically large antennas which have a well defined cophased radiating
aperture, a commonly used criteria is to state that the far-field region starts when:
where
L
is the antenna greatest dimension (length) and
λ
is the wavelength.
-
•
At the distance
R = 2L
2
/
λ
the difference in path length between the center of the
aperture and the edge of the aperture is λ/16, corresponding to a phase difference
of 22.5°.
-
•
If an
aperture antenna
is measured at the distance
R = 2L
2
/
λ
, it is found that the
recorded patterns do not deviate by more than a small factor from the value which
would be measured at an infinite distance.
-
•
Non-aperture antennas
behave in a different way and no simple formulae can be
derived to define the far-field distance.
-
•
For
small antennas
where
L
<<λ
, the simpler rule of thumb to define the far-field
region is
R =
2λ
, which is often sufficient.
Initially, the distinction between fields at a large distance and those nearer to the
antenna was emphasized by subdividing the
“
outer region
”
into two regions: the one near
the antenna called the
near-field
, or Fresnel region, and the one at a large distance called
the
far-field
, or Fraunhofer region.
Later, were coined names as
reactive near-field
for
“
antenna region
”
,
radiating
near-field
for the Fresnel region, and
far-field
for Fraunhofer region.
Antenna field regions
These antenna regions were named after the physicists Fresnel and Fraunhofer due to
the analogy of the antenna fields with their inventions and discoveries in optics.
In the
radiating near-field
Fresnel region, the radial field may be appreciable and the
shape of the field pattern is, in general, a function of the distance to the antenna.
In the
far-field
Fraunhofer region,
E
and
H
field vectors are transverse to the direction of
propagation and orthogonal to each other, and the impedance of the field |
E
|/|
H
| at each
location approaches the free-space wave impedance of 377 Ohms. The shape of the field
pattern is independent of the radius (distance to antenna) at which it is taken.
However,
the distance from an antenna, where far-field conditions are met,
depends on the dimensions of the antenna in respect to the wave length
.
For smaller antennas (e.g. a half-wave dipole) the wave fronts radiated from the antenna
become almost parallel at much closer distance compared to electrically large antennas.
A good approximation for small antennas is that far-field conditions are reached at:
R = 2λ
In the immediate vicinity of the antenna, there is the reactive near field. In this region,
the fields are predominately reactive fields, which means the
Electric-E
and the
Magnetic-H
fields are out of phase by 90° to each other (recall that for propagating or
radiating fields, the fields are orthogonal/perpendicular but are in phase).
For antenna
’s
greatest dimension
L
, the boundary of the
reactive near-field
region
R
is
commonly given as:
The
radiating near-field
or Fresnel region, is the region between the
reactive near-
field
and
far-field
. In this region, the reactive fields are not dominate and the
radiating fields begin to emerge. However, unlike the far-field region, here the shape
of the radiation pattern may vary appreciably with distance
R
from the antenna.
For
antenna dimension
L
,
the boundary of the
radiating near-field
region
R
is commonly
given by:
Note that depending on the values of
R
and the wavelength, this field may or may not exist.
As is defined, the far-field is the region far from the antenna. In this region, the
radiation pattern does not change the shape with distance
R
(although the fields still
die-off as
1/
R
, the power density dies-off as
1/
R
2
). This region is dominated by
radiated fields, with the
Electric-E
and
Magnetic-H
fields orthogonal to each other
and the direction of propagation as with plane waves.
If the
maximum linear dimension
of an antenna is the length
L
, then the following
three conditions must be all satisfied to be in the
far-field
region:
1)
2)
3)
The equations
1
) and
2
) from above, ensure that the power radiated in a given
direction from distinct parts of the antenna are approximately parallel (see figure below).
This helps ensure the fields in the far-field region behave like plane waves.
In the Far-Field the Rays from any point on the antenna are approximately parallel
-
-
Note that the dimension
L
of an Array Antenna is the
longest distance between
array
’s
extremities
. Depending by the number of antenna elements and by the
antenna array type, it is possible that the dimension
L
of an Array Antenna
to be
many times greater than the dimension
L
of a single antenna element
.
Thus, we can see how greater could be the far-field starting range of an Array
Antenna compared to the far-field range of a
single antenna element
.
-
-
Note that the sign “much greater than >>”
(equations 2 and 3) is typically assumed
satisfied if the left side of the equations is at least 10 times larger than right side.
The far-field equation number 3) come from the statement that near a radiating antenna,
there are reactive fields (see reactive near field region, above), that typically have the
Electric-E
fields and
Magnetic-H
fields die-off with distance as
1/
R
2
and
1/
R
3
.
The equation number 3) ensures that these near fields are gone, and we are left with the
radiating fields, which fall-off with distance as
1/
R
.
-
-
In antenna arrays, the far-field distance of
R > (2*L
2
)/
λ
, may not be sufficient for
low-sidelobe designs. As the observation distance moves in from infinity, the first
sidelobe rises and the null starts filling. Then the sidelobe becomes a shoulder on
the now wider main beam, and the second null rises. This process continues as
the distance decreases. To first order, the results are dependent only on design
sidelobe level.
-
-
Far-field region is referred as
Fraunhofer region
, a carryover term from optics.
-
-
The far-field region is the most important field, as this determines the antenna's
radiation pattern. Also, antennas are used to communicate wirelessly from long
distances, so this is the region of operation for most of the antennas.
Techniques how to increase the Antenna Gain and change the Radiation Pattern
For some applications, single element antennas are unable to meet the
gain
or the
radiation pattern
requirements.
To create a
high gain antenna
, which radiates radio waves in a narrow beam pointed to
a desired direction, few techniques can be used:
-
1.
One technique is to use
large metal surfaces
such as parabolic reflectors, horns or
dielectric lenses which
change the direction of the radio waves by reflection
or
refraction
, to focus the radio waves from a single low gain antenna into a beam.
This type of antenna is called an
Aperture Antenna
. Parabolic dish and horns are
examples of aperture antennas. Their gain increases with increased dimension.
Parabolic dish and horn antennas
-
2.
Increasing the
size of the antenna
(Antenna Aperture), the larger antenna becomes
more directive due to the periodic current distribution
across the antenna.
Although this method does not require external circuitry for control, the direction of
the beam is fixed and the number of sidelobes increases.
Examples include electrically long dipoles, horns, and waveguides.
-
-
It follows from elementary diffraction theory that if
L
is the
maximum
dimension of an antenna
in a given plane, and
λ
is the wavelength of the
radiation, then the
minimum angle resolution
ϴ
within which the radiation can
be concentrated in that plane is:
ϴ ≈
λ
/ L
where
ϴ
is in radians
-
3.
An antenna that consists of a single driven element connected to the feed-line, and
other elements which are not connected (called parasitic elements) is named
Parasitic Array
. Yagi-Uda antenna (invented in 1926 by
Shintaro Uda
and published
by
Hidetsugu Yagi
) is an example of Parasitic Array.
-
-
Yagi-Uda antenna use a driven element (which is a dipole or a folded dipole),
and one or more parasitic elements, as reflectors and directors. This antenna
can provide
high gain in a particular direction
(from the driven element to the
directors).
Yagi-Uda antenna
Antenna Pattern
-
-
The length of the driven folded dipole is about
λ
/2 and it is at its resonance.
-
-
Highest gain of Yagi-Uda antenna is obtained when the length of the reflector is
slightly greater than λ/2 and spaced at λ/4 from the driven element
, and when
the length of the director is about 10% less than λ/2 with an optimal spacing of
about λ/3.
Optical equivalent of Yagi-Uda antenna
-
-
Back lobe, seen in the antenna pattern of Yagi-Uda antenna, can be reduced
by bringing the elements closer. This reduces the input impedance of the
antenna and hence there will be a mismatch.
-
-
The effect of parasitic elements depends on their distance and tuning. In other
words, the effect depends on the magnitude and phase of the current induced
in them.
-
-
More directors can be used to increase the antenna gain. In this case, directors
can be equal in length or decreasing slightly, away from the driven element. But
adding too many directors will change the antenna impedance.
-
-
The purpose of the reflector and directors is to increase the gain but they load
the driven element.
-
4.
Another technique to increase the gain and to narrow the beamwidth is using an
Array Antenna
, which is a system of similar antenna elements oriented similarly to
get greater directivity in a desire direction.
-
-
If the single antenna element is repeated according to the periodicity of the current
distribution, an
Array Antenna
is created.
-
-
The amplitude and phase of the signals to individual
radiating antenna elements
can be adjusted to control both, the beam direction and sidelobe levels, creating a
Phased Array Antenna.
This results in a significantly more complex feeding network with higher losses
than the other methods.
-
-
The antenna elements are usually separated by a distance of
λ/2 (
half-wavelength)
in order to minimize the coupling between them (mutual coupling).
-
-
Larger separations result in higher grating lobes (unwanted beams).
-- In a Phased Array Antenna, the radio waves radiated by each individual
antenna element combine and superpose, adding together (interfering
constructively) to enhance the power radiated in desired directions, and
cancelling (interfering destructively) to reduce the power radiated in other
directions --
Phased Array Antennas
The
Phased Array Antenna
was invented in 1905 by
Karl F. Braun
.
Karl F. Braun also discovered the point-contact semiconductor (1874) and also invented
and built the first cathode-ray tube CRT, and the first CRT oscilloscope (1897).
He shared a Nobel Prize in Physics (1907) together with Guglielmo Marconi.
Karl F. Braun
mentioned in his Nobel Prize lecture the following experiments he did:
“
I found in 1902 that an antenna, inclined at somewhat less than 10° to the horizon, formed
a kind of directional receiver. The receptivity showed a clearly defined maximum for waves
passing through the vertical plane in which the antenna was situated. The results were
published in March of 1903. A directional transmitter is made up in the following way Fig12.
It is assumed that the antennae A and B, located at corners of an equilateral triangle, are
equal in phase, but are delayed by a quarter of a cycle of oscillation relative to antenna C,
which is in the third corner. The height CD of the triangle is to be a quarter wavelength.
The radiation will then prefer the direction CD. The wave emanating from C will reach AB at
the moment that A and B start to oscillate.
In Fig.13 is shown, schematically, the layout used.
The field was measured at a fair distance away, that is to say, in the so-called wave-zone.
There was satisfactory agreement between theory and observation, and the results were
checked in various ways. It was further shown that the experimental layout functioned in
the desired sense. By suitable distribution of the amplitudes in the three transmitters, a field
as in Fig. 14 was calculated (the
singly dotted curve is the measured field). The radial
vectors represent the range. If the roles of the three transmitters are exchanged - by simply
tripping a changeover switch - the preferred direction can be rotated through 120° or 60°.
”
The basic property of a
Phased Array Antenna
is that the relative position of the antenna
elements with respect to each other introduces relative phase shifts in the radiation vectors,
which can then add
constructively
in some directions or
destructively
in others.
This is a direct consequence of the translational phase-shift property of Fourier transforms:
A translation in Space or in Time becomes a Phase Shift.
Phased Array Antennas
are used to radiate power towards a desired angular
sector.
-
•
The number, the geometrical arrangement, and relative amplitudes and phases of the
array elements depend on the angular pattern that must be achieved.
Once a Phased Array Antenna has been designed to focus the beam towards a particular
direction, the beam it can be
steered
towards some other direction by changing the relative
phases of the array elements (the physical antenna structure can be stationary).
This process is called
Steering
or
Scanning
.
-
•
By properly adjusting the relative
Phase
or
Amplitude
of the array elements,
radiation pattern of the array is steered in a desired direction, or the main beam is
suppressed along undesired directions.
-
•
The beam steering works on both, transmit and receive.
By changing the relative amplitude and phase across the beam, we can steer the
beam and reduce the sidelobes of the resulting beam pattern.
-
•
On the transmit side, sidelobes are usually unwanted radiations of energy in
unwanted directions. On the receive side, sidelobes allow signals into the receiver
from unwanted directions, which will interfere with signals from desire direction.
-
•
The Phased Array Antenna can also be used to increase the overall gain, provide
diversity reception, cancel out interference from a particular set of directions,
determine the
direction of arrival (DOA)
of the incoming signals, maximize the
signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR), etc.
-
•
The radiation pattern of an Antenna Array is determined by the
type
of individual
elements used, their
orientation
, their
position
in space, and the
amplitude and
phase
of the currents feeding them.
-
•
The individual antennas, part of the Phased Array Antenna (called
antenna
elements
), are usually connected to a single receiver or a transmitter by feed-lines
that feed the power to the elements in a specific phase relationship.
-
•
Performances of the individual antenna elements part of the Antenna Array system
should not be underestimate or treated superficially, otherwise the entire
performances of the array will deteriorate.
-
•
The fields radiated from a
linear array antenna
are a superposition (sum) of the
fields radiated by each
antenna element
in the presence of the other elements.
Each antenna element has an excitation parameter, which is: current for a dipole,
voltage for a slot, and mode voltage for a multiple-mode element.
Array Antenna Elements
one needs to understand the radiated field intensity of an antenna element in the far-
field region.
element as a function of two far-field coordinates, while the radial distance remains
constant.
There are many categories of antennas: wire antennas (e.g., dipole, monopole, loop);
aperture antennas (e.g., horn); reflector antennas (e.g., parabolic, corner); lens antennas;
microstrip or printed antennas (e.g. patch, slot, PIFA).
Small individual antennas, such as quarter-wave monopoles and half-wave dipoles (or
derivates of them), don't have much directivity (or gain); they are omnidirectional antennas
which radiate radio waves over a wide angle. However, these antennas can be used as
antenna elements in a Phased Array Antenna system.
normalized with respect to the square root of the average radiated power per unit
solid angle.
with respect to that of an isotropic radiator that radiates an equal amount of power.
-
•
In most cases, the elements of a Phased Array Antenna are identical. This is not
necessary, but it is often convenient, simpler, and more practical.
-
•
The individual
antenna elements
of a Phased Array Antenna may be of any form as:
wires, patches, slots, apertures, etc.
Due to their multiple advantages and easier implementation, one of the most used
antenna elements
are the
Printed Microstrip Antennas
.
-
•
From the printed microstrip category,
Patch Antennas
are the most used elements in
Phased Array Antennas for various applications, from long range military radar
antennas to short distance commercial automotive radar sensors.
Patch Antenna Elements in a Phased Array
A microstrip patch antenna consists of a very thin metallic patch placed a small fraction
of a wavelength above a conducting ground-plane.
The patch and ground-plane are separated by a dielectric. The patch conductor is
normally copper and can assume any shape, but simple geometries generally are used,
and this simplifies the analysis and performance prediction.
The substrate is usually non-magnetic. The relative permittivity of the substrate is
normally in the region between 1 and 4, which enhances the fringing fields that account for
radiation, but higher values may be used in special circumstances.
Patch Antenna with direct feed connection
-
•
Due to its simple geometry, the halfwave rectangular patch is the most commonly
used microstrip antenna. It is characterized by its length
L
, width
W
and thickness
h
.
-
•
The two ends of the antenna can be viewed as radiating edges due to fringing fields
along each edge of width
W
. The width
W
is about one wavelength, but on the other
hand to get higher bandwidth usually
W <
2
*L
(
W
= 1.5*
L
is typical).
-
•
The two radiating edges are separated by a distance
L
. The two edges along the
sides of length
L
are often referred to as non-radiating edges.
-
•
The length
L
is approximately half guided
wavelength (λ
g
/2), where
λ
g
= λ/√ε
r
, and
ε
r
is the permittivity (dielectric constant) of the substrate.
The width
W
of the radiating edge, which is not critical, is chosen first.
If a square geometry is chosen it can be arranged to produce circularly polarized
waves. The length
L
is slightly less than a half-wavelength in the dielectric
(λ
g
/2).
The calculation of the precise value of the dimension
L
of the square patch is carried
out by an iteration procedure.
L
=
c / (2f
r
√ε
r
)
-
•
The resonant frequency
f
r
of the patch antenna is given by:
f
r
= c / (2
L
√ε
r
)
-
•
The typical shapes of the patch antenna are rectangular, square, elliptical, or circular,
while the rectangular patch is the most common configuration.
-
•
Based on the transmission line model and assuming
L
of a half-
wavelength λ/2, the
rectangular patch antenna can be considered as a resonating open-end transmission
line with a perfect reflection at the open end.
-
•
Since the end of the patch is open circuit, the current is zero at the end.
The current it is maximum and minimum at the center and beginning of the patch,
respectively.
The voltage is at a maximum of +V at the end, while it is at a minimum of −V at the
beginning.
-
•
As illustrated in figure above, there are fringing E-fields near the surface at both ends.
Since they are in phase along the Y-direction, they add up in phase and produce
radiation.
Patch Antenna Impedance Matching and Return Loss
-
•
The width
W
of the patch antenna determines the input impedance, bandwidth, and
radiation pattern. The larger the width
W
is, the lower the input impedance becomes.
-
•
For a square patch, the input impedance varies from 200
Ω to 300
Ω.
-
•
The input impedance can be reduced to 50
Ω
by increasing the width
W
, which
makes the antenna to occupy much space. This would be a problem in array
antennas where is limited space, and methods to lower the input impedance without
increasing the size are desirable.
-
•
Another commonly used method is to use a quarter-wavelength transmission
line printed on the same substrate, to transform the high input impedance of the patch
to a lower system impedance of 50
Ω or 75
Ω
However, the microstrip matching section is itself a radiating element due to the
discontinuity in line width, and the radiation from it may add to that of the antenna in ways
that are difficult to determine.
-
•
For a feed point at the radiating edge, the input impedance is maximum, and for a
feed point at the center of the patch, the input impedance is zero. Thus, the input
impedance can be controlled by adjusting the position of the feed point.
A match to 50
Ω
may be achieved by suitably locating the feed point.
The variation of
input resistance
R
(X)
as a function of feed-point position is approximated:
where
R
0
is the resistance at the edge of the patch and
x
is the distance from the edge.
-
•
The variation of
input resistance
in frequency with
feed position
is very minimal as
the probe approaches the center of the radiating patch.
-
•
The patch antenna
impedance bandwidth
can be increased by increasing the
substrate thickness and also by decreasing the dielectric permittivity (increasing the
Q-factor).
-
•
The radiated electric field is zero at the center of the patch, maximum (positive) at
one side, and minimum (negative) on the opposite side.
-
•
The patch far-field radiation pattern is orientated orthogonal to the surface conductor.
-
•
The surface conductor does not form the radiating element as it does in a dipole or a
monopole antenna. Instead,
radiation occurs from along patch edges
.
-
•
Feeding the patch antenna along the centerline is the most common situation
(minimizes higher-order modes and cross-polarization).
Patch Antenna Cross-Polarization
-
•
Cross-polarization
in a patch antenna is the undesired radiation component that is
orthogonal, or perpendicular, to the main, intended polarization (co-polarization).
For example, if an antenna is designed to be horizontally polarized, its cross-
polarization will be vertically polarized. This unwanted signal can cause interference
and reduce the overall performance of the antenna, especially in systems like Phased
Array Antennas where it can become significant when scanning (steering) the beam.
-
•
Cross-polarization occurs by:
-
-
Asymmetries
: Asymmetries in the antenna's structure, such as the placement of
the feed probe, can cause disturbances in the near-field that lead to cross-
polarized radiation.
-
-
Higher-order modes
: The radiation of higher-order modes and currents on
feeding probes can be a significant source of cross-polarization.
-
-
Anisotropy
: The substrate material and other structural elements can cause
anisotropy, which in turn leads to cross-polarized radiation.
-
•
Cross-polarization in patch antennas could be measured and minimized by:
-
-
Polarization purity
: Cross-polarization is a measure of how purely polarized an
antenna is, indicating the presence of unwanted polarization components.
-
-
Various methods to reduce cross-polarization:
-
a) Use
defected ground structures
by creating slots or patterns in the patch
antenna ground plane to cancel out the cross-polarized radiation.
-
b) Use techniques like
dual-probe feeding
with out-of-phase signals.
-
c)
Use
aperture-coupled feeds
to improve polarization purity.
-
d) Adding features like
shorting pins or air cavities
to the patch antenna to
control radiation patterns and reduce cross-polarization.
Feeding the Patch Antenna element
Different methods are available to feed the microstrip patch antennas. These
methods can be contacting and non-contacting methods.
-
•
In the
contacting method
, the RF power is fed directly to the radiating patch using a
connecting element such as a microstrip line.
-
•
In the
non-contacting method
, power is transferred between the microstrip line and
the radiating patch through electromagnetic coupling.
There are many patch antenna feed methods but the four most used and popular feeding
techniques are: microstrip line feed, coaxial probe feed (both contacting schemes),
aperture coupling and proximity coupling (both non-contacting schemes), inset feed.
Line Feed has the advantage that the feed can be etched on the same substrate to
provide a planar structure. There are three main methods for
microstrip line feed
:
-
-
The conducting strip is connected directly to the edge of the microstrip patch.
-
-
Instead connecting the feed line directly to the edge of the patch, a notch cut in the
patch (inset feed) can be used to improve the return loss and the bandwidth of the
antenna. The
inset feed
technique utilizes the reduction in electric field strength to
effectively “tap” a lower impedance drive point.
The inset feed distorts the equivalent slot radiation due to the change in geometry.
-
-
The quarter-wave
λ/4
transformer method uses the transmission line equation,
which provides the geometric mean of the input resistance and the characteristic
impedance of the λ/4 transmission line.
The λ/4 feed minimizes the equivalent slot field distortion due to the narrower,
high-impedance line required for impedance matching.
Inset feed
λ/4 transformer feed
Loosely gap coupled
Bottom layer feed
A coaxial connector is used to connect to the antenna (central pin connected to the
patch, and the outer conductor to the ground).
The major advantage of this is that the feed can be placed at any location inside the
patch in order to match with its input impedance.
The disadvantage is that it provides narrow bandwidth (5%) and is complex to model.
In this technique, the radiating patch and the microstrip feed line are separated by the
ground plane. The patch and the feed line are coupled through a slot in the ground
plane. The coupling slot is centered below the patch, leading to low cross polarization
due to symmetry of the configuration. Since the ground plane separates the patch
and the feed line, spurious radiation is minimized.
The main disadvantage of this feed technique is that it is difficult to fabricate due to
multiple layers, which also increases the antenna thickness.
This type of feed is also called as the electromagnetic coupling scheme.
Two dielectric substrates are used and the feed line is between the two substrates.
The radiating patch is on top of the upper substrate.
The main advantage of this feed technique is that it eliminates spurious feed radiation
and provides very high bandwidth (as high as 13%).
The major disadvantage of this feed scheme is that it is difficult to fabricate because
of the two dielectric layers which need proper alignment.
-
•
Inset Feeding
-
-
The inset feeding is one of the best techniques for perfect impedance matching.
-
-
Impedance of the patch varies with feeding location, and various antenna
performance parameters as return loss, bandwidth, and radiation can be controlled
by adjusting the inside point of the patch.
-
-
For better results, the feeding line should have the impedance equal to the
characteristics impedance at the point inside of patch
, usually of 50 Ω.
-
-
The inset feed introduces a physical notch, which in turn introduces a junction
capacitance.
-
-
The physical notch and its corresponding junction capacitance influence the
resonance frequency of the patch antenna.
-
-
As the inset feed-point moves from the edge toward the center of the patch the
resonant input impedance decreases monotonically and reaches zero at the
center. When the value of the inset feed point approaches the center of the patch,
the input resistance also changes rapidly.
There is an equation to calculate the position of inset feed point for a desire
impedance, usually where the input impedance is 50 ohms:
where,
Y
o
is the distance from the feeding point to the edge of the patch,
L
is the
patch length, and
Z
in
and
R
in
are the resonant input impedance and resonant input
resistance respectively.
Patch Antenna Inset Feeding
-
-
Experimentally was discovered that adjusting the
inset feed point Y
o
together
with adjusting the width
W
of the patch and also adjusting the width of the
notch, best antenna performances would be achieved, especially when the
patch is used as an element in a Phased Array Antenna.
Slot Antenna Elements in a Phased Array
A
slot antenna
consists of a metal surface (ground plane), usually a flat plate, with one or
more holes or slots cut out.
-
•
When the plate is driven as an antenna by an applied radio frequency current, the slot
radiates electromagnetic waves in a way similar to a
dipole antenna
. The shape and
size of the slot, as well as the driving frequency, determine the radiation pattern.
-
•
The slot antenna act as a magnetic dipole instead of an electric dipole; the magnetic
field is parallel to the long axis of the slot and the electric field is perpendicular.
Thus, the radiation pattern of a slot antenna can be the same as of a dipole antenna.
Microstrip slot antenna fed by a center oriented microstrip line
Where
W
is the width of the slot,
L
is the length of the slot,
f
r
is the resonant frequency,
ε
o
is the permittivity in free space,
μ
o
is the permeability in free space,
ε
r
is the dielectric
substrate,
ε
reff
is the effective dielectric constant of the substrate, and
d
is the height of the
substrate. In the equation could be also a
ΔL
(mainly related to the height of the substrate),
which is the extended increment length, that should be added to the length of the slot, but
usually this is not a significative length.
In a conventional
microstrip-fed slot antenna
(figure above), a narrow rectangular slot
is cut in the ground plane, and the slot is excited by a microstrip feedline with a short or an
open circuit termination.
-
•
With this feed configuration, a good impedance match has been achieved for a
narrow slot, and an impedance bandwidth of approximately 20% has been obtained.
-
•
However, as the width of the slot increases, the radiation resistance of the slot
antenna increases proportionately. This, in turn, reduces the impedance bandwidth of
the antenna even though the size of the slot is larger.
-
•
The feed structures of the conventional transverse slot antenna are either center
oriented (as in figure above) or are offset oriented.
-
•
The center-feed has a larger value of radiation impedance than an offset feed. This
means that the impedance bandwidth of a center-feed is less than for an offset-feed.
Four elements rectangular slotted array antenna
-
•
For optimal radiation characteristics, the length of all slots is taken to be at their
resonant length. For rectangular slots, this length is typically around 0.49λ.
For round-ended slots, the modified round-ended slot length values, differed from the
typical rectangular slot lengths by 1% to 3% only.
-
•
The position of the slots along the length of the array plays an important role in
ensuring feeding the slots in phase.
-
•
The phase shift between consecutive slots is determined by the electrical distance
2Πd/λ
g
, with
λ
g
being the
guide wavelength
defined as the distance traveled by the
electromagnetic wave along the length of the waveguide to undergo a phase shift of
2Π
radians.
When the radiowaves are conducted by a waveguide, and the antenna consists of multiple
slots in the waveguide, this is called a
slotted waveguide array antenna
.
Longitudinal Slotted Waveguide Array Antenna
-
•
Multiple slots act as a directive array antenna and can emit a narrow fan-shaped
beam of microwaves.
-
•
Because of the non-linear placements of the slots on the waveguide, at some specific
angles, grating lobes which are called butterfly lobes, rise above the sidelobe level.
There are two widely used types of slotted waveguide array antennas:
1.
Longitudinal slotted waveguide array antenna
, where the slots' axis is parallel
to the axis of the waveguide, and the antenna pattern is similar to a collinear antenna.
-
-
This antenna is usually mounted vertically, and its radiation pattern is
omnidirectional.
-
-
The same as collinear antenna, the gain of the longitudinal slotted waveguide
array increases by 3dB for each doubling of the number of slots.
-
-
This type of slot interrupts transverse currents on the broad wall.
-
-
A slot cut on the center does not radiate, because it interrupts nearly no net
current and it is ideal for probing the field in the waveguide.
-
-
Radiated power increases as the offset (slot’s distance from the center of the
waveguide) is increased.
-
-
Polarity is reversed when the slot is cut in the other side of the waveguide.
Slotted waveguide antenna (offset from the center line)
-
-
As the slot offset increases, level of the second order beams increase.
-
-
Also, second order beams vanish at Ф = 90°
There are a number of ways for suppressing unwanted off-axis lobes. Each of them tries to
have a uniform E-field (a collinear array) on the aperture:
different waveguide heights on the sides of the ridge.
or posts placed in the waveguide.
region and the non-linear placement effect of the slots will be eliminated.
This solution gives restrictions to the array size.
2. Transverse slotted waveguide antenna
, where the slots are almost
perpendicular to the axis of the waveguide but skewed at a small angle, with alternate
slots skewed at opposite angles.
Transverse slotted waveguide antenna
-
-
The transverse slotted array antenna radiates a dipole type pattern in the plane
perpendicular to the antenna, and a very sharp beam in the plane of the
antenna.
Due to this sharp radiated beam, this array antenna is used in microwave marine
radars, mounted horizontally on a mechanical drive that rotates the antenna scanning
the arrays fan-shaped beam by 360°.
-
•
The radiating elements of a
slotted waveguide array antenna
are an integral part of
the feed system, which is the waveguide itself. This simplifies the design since baluns
or matching networks are not required.
A familiarization with the modal fields within a waveguide is necessary to understand
where to place slots, so that they are properly excited.
-
•
Narrow slots that are parallel to waveguide wall currents do not radiate.
-
•
However, when a slot is cut into a waveguide wall and it interrupts the flow of current,
forcing it to go around the slot, power is coupled from the waveguide modal field
through the opening to free space.
-
•
To have good control of the excitation of a linear slot array, it is recommended that
the waveguide only operate in a single mode, preferably the lowest mode.
Slots cut in the walls of a rectangular waveguide (Volakis)
-
-
Slot
g
does not radiate because the slot is lined up with the direction of the
sidewall current.
-
-
Slot
h
does not radiate because the transverse current is zero there.
-
-
Slots
a, b, c, i
, and
j
are shunt slots because they interrupt the
transverse
currents (Jx, Jy)
and can be represented by two-terminal shunt admittances.
-
-
Slots
e, k
, and
d
interrupt Jz and are represented by series impedance.
-
-
Slot
d
interrupts Jx, but the excitation polarity is opposite on either side of the
waveguide centerline, thus preventing radiation from that current component.
-
-
Both Jx and Jz excite slot
f
. A Pi- or T-impedance network can represent it.
-
•
Rotating the slot with respect to a peak current direction can control the power
coupled to a slot. For example, slot
e
couples maximum power, while the power is
proportional to
sin
2
Ф
for slots
d
and
c
.
-
•
Another way to control coupled power is to take advantage of the natural field
intensities within the waveguide by locating the slots accordingly. For example, Jx is a
null at the center of the surface wall and varies sinusoidally as you approach the
edge. Therefore, by offsetting longitudinal slots such as slot
a
from the center of the
waveguide, the power coupled to the slots can be adjusted.
-
•
Moreover, depending on how the array is fed, the coupling of the waveguide to the
slots must vary progressively down the length of the waveguide if the first elements
are not to radiate all the power, with little power left for the remaining elements.
Feeding the Patch Antenna Elements in a Phased Array
There are few possibilities how to feed and how to arrange patch elements to form a
Phased Array Antenna.
Each feeding option have advantages and disadvantages on their implementation.
-
•
The most elementary Antenna Array is the
Linear Array
in which the array element
centers lie along a straight line.
-
•
When the array element centers are located in a plane it is said to be a
Planar Array
.
Series Feeding Linear Arrays
Corporate (Parallel) Feeding Linear Arrays
Combined Parallel/Series feeding
Offer the possibility of frequency scanning by changing frequency which changes
the electrical line length between elements, and thus the phase.
A series feed introduces dispersion that distorts short pulses and limits bandwidth.
-
•
Corporate (Parallel) Feed Patch Array:
-
-
Advantages: Equal Power at all Elements, Larger Bandwidth, Modular in Nature.
The equal line lengths in corporate feed makes the network frequency
independent, and thus wide bandwidth.
-
-
Disadvantages: Higher Feed Losses, Higher Cross Polarization.
-
•
Combination of Series and Corporate Feed Patch Array:
-
-
Combined Advantages and Disadvantages from the above.
-
•
If the array antenna system is one in which each antenna element of the operating
array is connected to a separate generator, this is often called an
active array
.
-
•
When a single generator excites all the elements through a network of power dividers
and phase shifters, the antenna may be called a
passive array
.
Such an antenna does not have the obvious identical performance for every element
that the infinite active array has. Furthermore, reflections from the elements do not
necessarily return to the generator, but may be absorbed in terminations or reradiated
in other directions depending on the particular network used. Thus, the passive array
is actually more complicated to analyze than the active one. The active array not only
is relatively simple, but also it provides the concepts and fundamental limitations for
any array antenna.
Hertzian Dipole Array Antennas
The infinitesimal
Hertzian Dipoles
(dipole with total length <<
λ
) are the simplest
antenna elements outside of point sources (isotropic).
Placing several of these dipole antennas in the vicinity of each other causes the dipole
elements to interact. In other words, the dipoles all radiate and receive time-varying fields
from each other. This interaction is called
mutual coupling
, which will be discussed later.
Examples:
Ex.1)
. An 8-element linear array lying along the
x-axis
with spacing
d
=
λ
/2 has the array
antenna pattern shown in figure below.
(8 isotropic elements)
(8 Hertzian dipole elements)
Antenna pattern of an 8-element linear array (dipole elements placed on
x
-axis and oriented in
z
-direction)
-
•
The array factor of isotropic antenna elements (left figure) has no polarization,
because point sources have no polarization. Its directivity is 9dB.
The peak occurs at
Ф
= 90°
for all
ϴ
angles.
-
•
Replacing the point sources (isotropic elements) with
z
-directed Hertzian dipole
antennas having each a directivity of 1.76dB, results in the array antenna pattern
shown in the above right figure. This antenna pattern is
ϴ
-polarized with no radiation
in the
z
-direction, because the element pattern has a null in that direction.
The directivity of this dipole array is 11.9dB and can be calculated using numerical
integration of the
array factor
times the
element pattern.
Ex.2)
. An 8-element linear array lying along the
z
-axis with spacing
d
= λ/2
has the array
antenna pattern shown in figure below:
(8 isotropic elements)
(8 Hertzian dipole elements)
Antenna pattern of an 8-element linear array (dipole elements placed on
z
-axis and oriented in
z
-direction)
-
•
Even though the Hertzian dipole array on
x
-axis has the same number and the same
type of elements as the Hertzian dipole array placed on
z
-axis, its directivity is 14.6dB
(2.7dB higher).
-
•
Unlike with point sources (isotropic elements), the orientation of the dipole elements
relative to the array has a significant effect on the array directivity and on the array
antenna pattern.
Array Antenna Radiation Patterns
Antenna pattern in polar 2D coordinates
Antenna pattern in rectangular coordinates in dB
Antenna fields pattern in 3D coordinates
-
•
Phased Array Antenna give a great flexibility in designing the radiation pattern
because there are so many variables that can be adjusted.
-
•
The overall
radiation pattern
of an antenna array is the product of the
Element
Factor
(the radiation pattern of a single antenna element) multiplied by an
Array
Factor
(
AF
), which depends on how the antenna array is arranged.
For
Phased Antenna Arrays
using identical radiating antenna elements, there are at least
five types of controls that can be used to shape the overall pattern of the antenna system:
1.
The
geometrical configuration
of the overall Array Antenna (linear, circular,
rectangular, spherical, etc.).
2.
The relative
spacing
between the radiating elements.
3.
The excitation
amplitude
of the individual radiating elements.
4.
The excitation
phase
of the individual radiating elements.
5.
The relative
pattern
of the individual radiating elements.
Array Factor (AF)
-
•
The radiated field of an array antenna, essentially is the summation of the individual
element fields. It can be shown that the far-field pattern of an array of identical
elements can be represented by a product of two quantities, namely the
Element
Pattern
and the
Array Factor
. The element pattern signifies the radiation behavior of
an individual element and the array factor signifies the arraying effect, including array
architecture and relative excitations of the elements.
-
•
Array Factor
(
AF
) is directly influenced by the number of antenna elements, by the
inter-element spacing, and by the excitation amplitude.
where
N
is the number of antenna elements,
a
i
is the excitation amplitude,
d
i
is the inter-
element spacing,
ϕ
i
is the excitation phase, and
k
is the propagation constant for the
i
th
element.
-
•
The number of antenna elements
N
in an antenna array plays an important role in
beam forming, beam steering, and interference reduction.
In the figure below is plotted the Array Factor (AF) of an antenna array by varying the
number of the antenna elements while keeping the spacing
d
between two consecutive
elements as λ
/2
and ϕ
i
= 90°. The results are normalized with respect to the maximum
value of the main lobe.
-
•
It has found that the Half Power Beam Width (HPBP) is decreased with an increase in
the number of elements, but with a minor reduction in the Side Lobe Level (SLL).
Array Factor (AF) varied with number of antenna elements (N from 2 to 12)
-
•
The array factor, so the performance of the antenna array, is also dependent on the
distance
d
between two consecutive antenna elements.
In the plot below could be observed the effect of spacing
d
on the radiation characteristics
of an array antenna. A simulation has been carried out with spacing
d
changing from λ/2 to
a relatively small separation, up to
d
= λ/10
.
It has been demonstrated that the distance
d
between the elements should be close to λ
/2.
Array Factor (AF) varied with distance between elements
, d decreasing from λ/2 to λ/10
-
•
Excitation amplitude
for each individual element, commonly known as a
weight
factor
, also changes radiation characteristics of an array antenna. If the inter-element
spacing and excitation phase are fixed (i.e., the inter-element spacing
d
between two
adjacent antenna elements is λ
/2 while excitation phase for each element is 90°)
changing the
excitation amplitude
value for various elements of an array antenna,
we can change the overall array pattern.
In the plot below, a comparative analysis of weighted and un-weighted array antenna
design is presented. Could be observed that for equal amplitude excitation, the
Half Power
Beam Width
(HPBW) is decreased and the
Side Lobe Level
(SLL) is increased, while for
unequal amplitude excitation, the SLL is reduced and the HPBW is increased.
Array Factor (AF) varied for equal and unequal excitation amplitude
-
•
The
excitation amplitude of each antenna element
could be optimized for
minimum Side Lobe Level (SLL) and keeping in the same time a good compromise
for Half Power Beam Width (HPBW).
-
•
Considerable improvement in the HPBW has been observed while the SLL is
suppressed (doing amplitude optimization) with increasing number of antenna
elements, as is shown in the plot below.
Array Factor (AF) varied with N and optimized excitation amplitude
-
•
The performance of an array antenna is also dependent on the distance
d
between
two consecutive elements. Mathematical algorithms are used to obtain the optimum
values of inter-element spacing.
-
•
Higher values of inter-element spacing contributed to higher number of side lobes,
narrower main lobe, higher directivity, and lower Half Power Beam Width (HPBW).
-
•
Inter-element spacing
d
equals to λ
/2 was found to be the most suitable value for
planar array antenna design based on the analysis.
-
•
Meanwhile, higher number of antenna elements increased the value of directivity of
the planar array with narrower HPBW.
Array Factor (AF) when inter-element spacing was optimized
The
Normalized Array Factor
𝐟(𝚿)
for an
N
element, uniformly excited, equally spaced
linear array (UE, ESLA) that is centered about the coordinate origin is:
f(Ψ)
=
sin (
NΨ/2)
N sin(Ψ/2)
where the
wave number
(array phase function):
Ψ
= k
∙
d
∙
sin
θ + δ
δ
is the phase difference between the two sources, and
θ
is the angle of incidence or the
angle between the wave vector
k
and the array axis.
Conclusions after analyzing the Array Factor plots for various number of elements
N
:
-
•
As
N
increases, the main lobe narrows (beamwidth decreases).
-
•
As
N
increases, there are more side lobes in one period of
f(Ψ)
.
The number of full lobes (one main lobe and the side lobes) in one period of
f(Ψ)
equals N - 1.
There will be N - 2 side lobes, and one main lobe in each period.
-
•
The minor lobes (side lobes) have the width 2π/N in the variable
Ψ,
and the major
lobes (main and grating lobes) are twice this width (4π/N).
-
•
|
𝐟(𝚿)|
is symmetric about
π
.
-
•
The side lobe peaks decrease with increasing
N
.
-
•
A measure of the side lobe peaks is the
Side Lobe Level
(SLL)
which is defined as:
𝐒𝐋𝐋
=
|𝐦𝐚𝐱𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐞|
|𝐦𝐚𝐱𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐞|
(often expressed in dB)
HPBW vs SLL in a 30 element Linear Array Antenna
-
•
As the Side Lobe Level SLL decreases, the energy in the main lobe increases leading
to beam broadening. Thus, SLL lowering is a trade-off with HPBW and thereby the
gain and efficiency of an array antenna.
The
Directivity
of the array antenna can be defined as the ratio of radiation intensity in a
given direction from the array antenna to the radiation intensity averaged over all directions.
-
•
The directivity of the linear antenna array can be improved by controlling the inter-
element spacing
d
and the excitation amplitude.
-
•
Lower value of directivity
is observed for lower value of inter-element spacing
d
and vice versa.
Therefore,
inter-
element spacing equal to λ
/2 is favored to achieve higher
directivity in planar array antenna
.
-
•
The
directivity of planar array antenna increases with the number of antenna
elements
. This indicates that, higher directivity of array antenna can be achieved by
placing large number of
N
antenna elements in the array aperture.
2D plot of directivity for optimized excitation amplitude and inter-element spacing
-
•
Array Antenna
Edge of the Coverage (EOC) directivity
refers to the directivity of an
array antenna at the edges of its intended coverage area, which is a critical
performance parameter for applications like satellite and cellular communications.
Optimizing for EOC directivity involves shaping the array antenna's aperture and
illumination to ensure maximum power is delivered to the coverage boundary, often at
the expense of peak directivity or by using a smaller aperture for a larger coverage
area.
-
•
The relationship between array antenna directivity and the Edge of Coverage (EOC)
directivity is generally an inverse one: increasing directivity to create a narrower beam
often reduces the signal strength at the edge of the coverage area.
-
•
While
peak directivity
is the maximum directivity in any direction,
EOC directivity
is
focused on maximizing directivity at the coverage boundary.
Array antennas can form a
highly directive beam (high directivity) by controlling
the phase and amplitude of each element
. This allows for constructive interference
in a desired direction and destructive interference elsewhere, focusing the radiated
power.
A smaller aperture is needed for a larger EOC coverage area.
-
•
The
3dB beamwidth
is related to EOC directivity; fitting it to the cell edge provides
similar directivity at the edge but can lead to a worse roll-off. Using a different beam
pattern, like a 10dB fit, can improve roll-off, potentially reducing interference in
neighboring cells, but it comes at the cost of reduced link budget at the cell edge.
-
•
The maximum-gain theorem yields the optimum excitation condition of the array
antenna to achieve maximum
gain
along a desired direction.
-
•
For identical radiation patterns of the antenna elements, the amplitude distribution
should be uniform in order to have maximum array gain.
However, the amplitude distribution should not be uniform for dissimilar elements;
thus the maximum-gain theorem has very important significance in designing a pencil
beam array with dissimilar elements.
Another important application of linear array antenna is the
Null Control
:
-
•
The
null control
refers to control the radiation pattern in a way such that a relatively
small amount of power is received/radiated in certain directions.
-
•
On the transmitting side,
the null control is used for transmitting low power in the
directions where an eavesdropper is present
.
-
•
On the receiver, it is used to
reduce the amount of power received from
interferers
.
-
•
The null control can be achieved by controlling the parameters as: excitation
amplitude, excitation phase, inter-element spacing, and the number of
elements
.
-
•
It is important to mention that, always
reducing the amount of power in one
direction means that power is increased in another direction
.
Ideally, the power is decreased in the direction of interferers and the main beam is
increased in the same direction. Generally, it is hard to accomplish this, and it is
needed to do a tradeoff.
Array
Factor (AF) when nulls are imposed at θ=50°, 55°, 125°, and 130°
Array Antenna Patterns
–
Broadside (Boresight) and End-fire
-
•
An Antenna Array is said to be
Broadside Array
if the main beam is perpendicular to
the axis of the array (θ = 90°).
-
•
For optimum performance, both the
Element factor (pattern)
and the
Antenna
factor
AF
, should have their maxima at θ = π/2 =
90°.
-
•
The maximum of the broadside array factor occurs when the
array phase function
𝚿
is zero.
Ψ
=
β
+
kd cosθ
|
θ = 90°
= 0
=> β
= 0 (phase angle)
For a broadside array, in order the above equation to be satisfied with θ = 90°,
the
phase
angle β
must be zero, which means, all elements of the Array Antenna must be driven with
the same phase.
Ψ
=
(
2Π
λ
d cosθ)
=
Π
cosθ
-
•
An Array Antenna is said to be
End-fire array
if the main beam is along the axis of
the array (θ = 0° or 180°)
The maximum of the end-fire array factor occurs when the array phase function
Ψ
= 0
Ψ
= β + kd cosθ |
θ=0° or θ=180°
= 0
β =
-
kd for θ = 0°
β = kd for θ = 180°
-
•
The
Half Power Beam Width
(HPBW)
of the
broadside array
is less than that of the
end-fire array
(narrower beam), but the directivity of the end-fire array is larger than
the broadside array. End-fire excitation has a fat main lobe and a simple coherent
excitation is not optimal solution for directivity.
-
•
For long arrays (Nd >> λ) uniformly excited linear antenna array, the
Half Power
Beam Width (HPBW)
is approximately:
HPBW = 0.886
λ
Nd
csc θ
0
near broadside
and
HPBW =2
√0.886
λ
Nd
end-fire
(θ
o
= main beam pointing angle)
-
•
A commonly quoted beamwidth is the
First Null Beamwidth FNBW
(or
Null to Null
Beamwidth
). This is the angular separation from which the magnitude of the
radiation pattern decreases to zero (negative infinity dB) away from the main beam.
-
-
The angular span between the first pattern nulls adjacent to the main lobe, is
called as the
First Null Beam Width
FNBW
.
-
-
FNBW
is the angular separation, quoted away from the main beam, which is
drawn between the null points of the radiation pattern, on its major lobe.
Example
: A broadside beam (with maximum at
θ
=90°), if the pattern goes first to
zero at 60° and also at 120°, the
First Null Beamwidth (FNBW)
is: 120° - 60° = 60°
The main beam nulls are where the
Array Factor
𝐟(𝚿)
first goes to zero in a plane
containing the linear array.
For long array
antennas (length L = Nd >> λ), we can approximate the
First Null
Beamwidth FNBW
(or Null-to-Null Beamwidth) as follows:
FNBW
=
2λ
Nd
near broadside
FNBW
= 2
√
2λ
Nd
end-fire
-
•
Both
HPBW
and
FNBW
depends on the
Array Antenna length Nd
and
main beam
pointing angle θ
o
.
-
•
Comparing the equations for
HPBW
and
FNBW
, we can see that HPBW is roughly
one-half of the corresponding
FNBW
value for long, uniformly excited linear arrays.
-
•
Antenna Array Directivity
D
represents the increase in the radiation intensity in the
direction of maximum radiation over a single element.
Antenna Array directivity is determined entirely from the radiation pattern.
The directivity
D
of a broadside array of isotropic elements is given by:
D = 2
Nd
λ
where: N=nr. of elements, d=spacing between elements
Instead, they have
directionality
that is proportional to their size.
The antenna elements also have
frequency, impedance
, and
polarization
properties which are not associated with isotropic point sources.
-
•
Normally, the elements of an array antenna are spaced relatively close together, so
an antenna
element is typically no larger than λ
/2
x
λ/2 in area in a square lattice.
As such, the
element pattern
is too small to have sidelobes.
A typical element pattern for an antenna array in the X-Y plane can be reasonably
approximated by
cosϴ
or
sinФ
or the change in the projected area of the element.
-
•
Element spacing in an array is determined by the distance between phase centers of
adjacent elements. An isotropic point source actually represents the phase center of
the antenna element, which is the center of a sphere of constant phase radiated by
the antenna. This phase center moves with frequency and angle so, in actuality, it
only exists for a portion of a sphere at a given frequency.
-
•
The array antenna pattern, or the directivity of the array, depends by the directivity of
the elements in the array.
Array pattern = Element pattern
x
Array factor
There are several important differences between the
array pattern
and the
array factor:
-
•
First, the
array antenna pattern
has a polarization that is determined by the array
elements. Usually, all the antenna elements are oriented in the same direction, so the
array polarization is the same as the polarization of a single antenna element.
However, it is possible to orient the elements in a way that causes the array antenna
pattern to have a different polarization from the element pattern.
The element pattern enhances the array factor in the direction of the element pattern
peak and suppresses the array factor in direction of element pattern minima.
-
•
A final difference is that
element orientation
is important, because the element
directivity and polarization are a function of angle.
-
-
If the
peak of the element pattern
points in the same direction as the
array
factor peak
, then the array pattern main beam is enhanced.
-
-
If an element pattern null points in the direction of the array factor peak, then the
antenna pattern has a null in that direction.
-
•
The complete pattern of a phased array is found by multiplying the array factor by the
element pattern, as was stated above. The important subtlety in pattern multiplication
is that while the array factor scans with phase change, the antenna element pattern
remains fixed. As a phased array is steered, the peak of the total array pattern follows
the element pattern shape.
Thus, the
array element patterns
remain fixed in space.
-
-
When the peak of the array factor and the peak of the element pattern align,
then the main beam of the resulting antenna pattern is a maximum, while the
sidelobes far from the main beam are reduced.
-
-
When the array factor is
steered
, the element pattern remains
stationary
.
Thus, the product of the array factor and main beam changes as the main beam
is steered.
-
-
Steering the main beam reduces the peak of the
array antenna pattern
due to
the decrease in the
element pattern
. The element pattern also causes a squint
in the main beam away from broadside.
Thus, a correction to the steering phase for the array factor is necessary to
make sure that the peak of the antenna pattern points to the desired angle.
-
•
Unlike with point sources, the
orientation of the element
relative to the array has a
significant effect on the
directivity
and on the
antenna pattern
of the array.
Null-free Array Antenna Pattern
Some antenna applications require patterns without nulls, as the airport beacon
antennas which must radiate uniformly, to be able to communicate with aircrafts arriving
from all directions.
To obtain a null-free array antenna pattern, typically need to optimize the array's element
excitations and their arrangements to minimize or eliminate nulls in the radiation pattern.
Here are some common approaches:
-
•
Array Design and Element Placement:
-
-
Use uniform or non-uniform element spacing to control grating lobes and nulls.
-
-
Avoid regular spacing that can create deep nulls in certain directions.
-
•
Amplitude and Phase Weighting (Beamforming):
-
-
Apply amplitude tapering (windowing functions like Taylor, Chebyshev, or
Taylor) to reduce sidelobes and nulls.
-
-
Use phase adjustments to steer the main beam and fill in nulls.
-
•
Null Steering Techniques:
-
-
Implement adaptive algorithms (e.g., Minimum Variance Distortionless
Response - MVDR) to dynamically suppress nulls and optimize the pattern.
-
-
Use adaptive beamforming to continuously modify the excitation for null-free
patterns.
-
•
Optimization Algorithms:
-
-
Use numerical methods (genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, convex
optimization) to find the excitation weights that minimize null depth across
desired directions.
-
-
Multi-Objective Design:
-
-
Balance sidelobe levels and null depths through multi-objective optimization to
achieve a more uniform pattern.
Phased Array Antenna Beamforming
-
•
Beamforming
, or
spatial filtering
, is done by combining signals in an array antenna
in such mode that signal directed in particular direction get constructed interference
when others expect destructive interference.
-
•
In order to achieve
spatial selectivity,
beamforming can be used in both,
transmitting and receiving.
-
•
In a linear array antenna, we get sharper beam if put more elements into array.
A sharper beam means a narrower 3dB beamwidth (HPBW).
Linear antenna arrays with 8 and 16 elements and their antenna pattern
Two-dimensional array antennas and their antenna pattern
Principle of Beamforming
There are three main approaches to get Beamforming in an Array Antenna system:
-
-
Analog Beamforming
-
-
Digital Beamforming
-
-
Hybrid Beamforming
The RF signal is phase adjusted per antenna element in the RF domain, for a single
signal after DAC in transmit mode. Analog beamforming can only apply a spatial filter
on a single signal. Analog beamforming is relatively cheap to integrate and allows
better coverage of a system.
Analog Beamforming
Advantages of Analog Beamforming:
Disadvantages of Analog Beamforming:
-
•
In a
Digital Beamforming
approach the beams are formed using complex digital
weights, rather than with analog phase shifters.
-
-
A full receiver chain from antenna element to digits is required at every element
in the array.
-
-
Due to high complexity of RF routing (Mixing and Local Oscillator) the digital
beamforming approach cannot be used at mmWave frequencies.
Digital Beamforming
-
•
Digital beamforming applies amplitude and phase variations in the digital domain,
before the DAC in transmit mode. Every element requires an individual DAC/ADC
and baseband processing.
-
•
With digital beamforming, parts of the same signal can be radiated in different
directions, or signals from different directions can be received simultaneously and
extracted individually, or interference from certain directions can be mitigated.
It also allows frequency-selective beamforming.
-
•
Digital beamforming is more flexible and can improve the capacity of a system.
However, it is more costly and power consuming compared to analog beamforming.
Advantages of Digital Beamforming:
-
-
Extreme flexibility with number of beams and nulls.
-
-
Can provide high number of beams.
-
-
Number of beams can be changed dynamically with no change in hardware.
Disadvantages of Digital Beamforming:
In Hybrid Beamforming, there is a formation of analog (sub-array) beams from a portion of
the full array.
Hybrid Beamforming
Formation of analog (sub-array) beams
-
•
In Hybrid Beamforming, each ADC/DAC of the digital beamformer is connected to
multiple elements featuring an analog beamformer on top.
-
•
Hybrid beamforming can be used to leverage the power of digital beamforming
without requiring a transceiver chain for each antenna element.
-
•
Hybrid Beamforming can provide many beams and nulls, and does not require a full
RF chain per element, only a full RF chain per sub-array.
-
•
Hybrid Beamforming approach it is suitable to be used at mmWave frequencies.
-
•
The Array Antenna beam shape is defined by many array characteristics including the
physical dimensions of the array and the amplitude/phase weights associated with
each antenna element.
-
•
The Array Antenna sidelobe level is defined primarily by the phase and amplitude
errors occurring in the many parts of the array, including the beamformer.
If the calibration of these errors is implemented, the resulting array sidelobe level
decreases further.
Array Antenna Scanned Beam (Beam Steering)
-
•
A
Phased Array Antenna
is typically designed to have maximum directive gain at
broadside, that is, at θ = 90° (for an array along the x
-axis).
But in some applications the goal is to direct the main lobe of the radiation pattern at an
angle other than the
broadside
or
end-fire
directions.
The scan angle of the pattern dictates this
steered angular location
.
This is the basic principle of
electronic scanning
for phased array antennas.
-
•
One way of achieving Beam Steering is to switch ON and OFF certain antenna
elements of the array.
-
•
Another way is to control the relative phase and amplitude of the signals from groups
of array elements, or each individual element. With a large enough array antenna and
sophisticated enough electronic control and feed system, beam steering antennas
can be made that direct the main lobe of the antenna anywhere to the maximum
beam angle, relatively rapidly steer the beam, and even create multiple lobes that are
independently steered.
The antenna elements phases are adjusted to form a phase front that is planar and
oriented to steer the main beam in a direction normal to the formed planar wavefront.
-
•
A 2D phased array with the right beamforming control system is able to generate a
beam that can be scanned side-to-side (azimuth) and up-and-down (elevation).
-
•
The
gain of the antenna elements
, the
number of antenna elements
and
the
directivity of each antenna element,
dictates the
gain of the array antenna
.
-
•
Generally, the optimum gain for a phased array antenna
is at “broadside” or
“boresight”
which is directly perpendicular to the linear or flat panel array antenna.
-
•
Directivity of the array factor remains relatively constant, with scan for spacings
between elements less than a
λ/2
, and for scan angles not close to endfire.
-
•
The
phased array gain drops as a cosine function of the angle from broadside
.
At +/- 60º from broadside a phased array antenna exhibits half the gain at
broadside, and zero at end-fire conditions (+/- 90º from broadside).
-
•
To achieve a full 360º coverage with a phased array antenna typically requires four
phased array antennas or a mechanically rotating antenna (gimbal system). Widening
the antenna element spacing is a way of enhancing the beam scanning angle of a
phased antenna array. However, there is a practical limitation to element spacing, as
grating lobes generate ambiguity problems when the elements are spaced further
than fraction of the smallest operating wavelength for a given antenna element
design. At extreme angles for a given antenna element spacing, side lobes are also
generated by phased arrays that are not negligible, and often variable attenuators are
used to enhance sidelobe suppression performance.
-
•
Electronic scanning can be constructed with:
-
Phase scanning
. The beam of antenna points in a direction that is normal to the
radiated phase front. In phased array antennas, this phase front is adjusted to steer
the beam by individual control of the phase excitation of each radiating element.
The phase shifters are electronically actuated to permit rapid scanning and are
adjusted in phase to a value between 0 and 2
π
rad.
-
Time-delay scanning
. Phase scanning are frequency-sensitive. However, time-
delay scanning is independent of frequency. Delay lines are used instead of phase
shifters, providing an incremental delay from element to element. Individual time-
delay circuits are naturally too cumbersome to be added to each radiating element,
and a reasonable compromise may be reached by adding one time-delay network to
a group of elements (subarray) where each element has its own phase shifter.
Time-delay overcomes instantaneous bandwidth limitation of phase shifters.
-
Frequency scanning
. Frequency rather than phase may be used as the active
parameter to exploit the frequency-sensitive characteristics of phase scanning. At one
particular frequency, all antenna radiators are in phase. As the frequency is changed,
the phase across aperture tilts linearly, and the beam is scanned. Frequency-
scanning array antennas are relatively simple and inexpensive to implement.
-
Beam switching
. Avoids use of variable phase shifters. With properly designed
antenna lenses or reflectors, a number of independent beams may be formed by
feeds at the focal surface. Each beam has substantially the gain and beamwidth of
the whole antenna. All the beams lie in one plane, and greater antenna complexity is
required for switching beams in both planes.
-
Digital beamforming
. For receiving, the output from each antenna element may be
amplified and digitized. The signal is then processed by a computer, which can
include the formation of multiple simultaneous beams (formed with appropriate
aperture illumination weighting) and adaptively derived nulls in the beam patterns to
avoid spatial interference or jamming.
-
Analog or digital phase shifters
(ferrite or semiconductor diodes) are also used
for beam scanning.
- Phase scanned in only a plane containing line of elements.
- Beamwidth in a plane perpendicular to the line of element centers is determined by
the element beamwidth in that plane (limitation of realizable gain).
-
•
When is required to form a high gain pencil beam, or beam scanning in any direction,
multidimensional arrays are used.
When the scanning is required to be continuous, the feeding system must be capable of
continuously varying the progressive phase
θ
between the elements.
Assuming that the maximum radiation of the array antenna is required to be oriented at
angle
θ
0
, or
in other words, to “electronically” rotate, or steer, the array pattern towards
some other direction, without physically rotating the antenna.
To accomplish this, the progressive phase excitation
β
between the elements must be
adjusted so that:
Ψ
= β +kd cosθ
0
= 0
β =
-
kd cosθ
0
which is named
steering phase
-
•
Thus, by controlling the progressive phase difference between the antenna-elements,
the maximum radiation can be squinted in any desired direction to form a scanning
array. This is the basic principle of scanning array operation.
Basically, a
Phased Array Antenna
system is a combination of
N
antennas made to get:
-
-
A
higher gain
antenna system.
-
-
An
increased directivity
antenna system.
-
-
Ability to get
steerable and directive
radiated signal.
The fundamental configuration for elements in an array is the
Linear Antenna Array
shown in the picture below.
-
•
The output of each element can be controlled in amplitude and phase as indicated by
the
attenuators
and
phase shifters
.
-
•
Amplitude
and
Phase
control provide for custom shaping of the
radiation pattern
and for
scanning
of the pattern in space.
-
•
A
Power Distribution Network
is used to route the signal to each antenna element.
Scanned beam array block diagrams
-
•
Electronic scanning of a
phased array antenna
(varying the phase and amplitude of
each element) results in a beam distortion with scan angle.
-
-
This distortion represents a spread of the beam shape and a consequent
reduction in
antenna array gain
, known as
Scan Loss
.
-
-
At the origin, where the boresight angle is zero, there is no scan loss.
Array Antenna Beam Distortion (Scan Loss)
-
•
The
element spacing
has no direct influence on the
scan gain
. Typically, the
element gain peaks at the bore sight, implying that the scan gain decreases as the
scan angle moves away from the boresight.
-
•
The
scan loss
is defined as the
relative gain loss
in decibels with respect to the
boresight scan.
-
•
The
larger the element size
, the
higher is the scan loss
because a larger element
has a sharp roll-off pattern.
-
•
The
beamwidth increases
as the
scan angle increases
. This is consistent with the
scan loss behavior because a
low gain
corresponds to a
wide beamwidth
.
-
•
If the element gain does not have a rapid variation within the scan region, then the
beam width of the scan beam remains unaffected.
-
•
In general, the scanning range of phased array antenna means 3dB-coverage, or
half-power beamwidth (HPBW), and is limited by the
radiating element pattern
.
For example, for
patch antenna elements
, the HPBW is limited to about 90°-100°.
For rectangular arrays, the 3dB beam contour is approximately elliptical.
-
•
As the
beam is steered to a wider angle
, the
scan loss increases
due to the
element pattern and the scanning range is limited. Therefore, in order to achieve the
wide-angle scanning (140° or more), the antenna element pattern should be widened.
-
•
If the antenna element has a wide beam pattern, the scan loss is small and a wider
range can be scanned. However, the element spacing is limited to λ/2 or less to avoid
the ambiguity problems caused by grating lobes, so the wide-angle elements should
be designed within a physical size smaller than λ/2. As the beam is steered to a
wider
angle, arises a problem that the side lobe level rises to a non-negligible level.
-
•
A second method to achieve wide-angle scanning is using
pattern reconfigurable
antenna (PRA)
elements. The PRA elements often have antenna sizes larger than
λ
/2 due to the addition of the multiple feeding networks, parasitic elements, and
switching networks. In these cases, because the element spacing should be set wide,
the array becomes a sparse array and the grating lobes occur.
-
•
An antenna array with uniform illumination (equal elements amplitude) results in
relative high level of the first side lobe levels, which may be unacceptable for some
applications due to regulatory, interference, or stealth reasons.
Amplitude weighting of each antenna element for reducing grating lobes during steering
-
•
Decreasing the gain (amplitude levels) of the outside elements results in an increased
main beam width. The grating lobe levels are usually controlled by applying window
functions. Every change of the weights leads to a change in the radiation pattern,
while each window has its own set of advantages and drawbacks.
-
•
Tapering
is the process of
assigning different gains (levels)
to the various antenna
elements within the array, where the center elements are assigned the highest gains,
and the outer elements are assigned lower gains.
-
•
Note that, the more quickly element gain is reduced as the elements get farther from
the center of the array, the greater the suppression of side lobes.
-
•
Taper comes at a price. When taper is applied, the directivity is less than uniform
illumination for the same size array antenna, and the beamwidth is broader.
-
•
It is possible to determine the antenna element current amplitudes such that the
beamwidth is minimum for a specified side lobe level, or conversely, to specify the
beamwidth and obtain the lowest possible side lobe level.
-
•
If the amplitude tapers to a small value at the edge of the array antenna (binominal
distribution), minor lobes can be eliminated.
On the other hand, if the distribution has an inverse taper with maximum amplitude at
the edges and none at the center of the array (edge distribution), the minor lobes are
accentuated, being in fact equal to the main lobe.
-
•
The radiation pattern of the single-antenna element used in the array is called the
“
primary pattern
”.
The isolated element pattern is measured with all other elements
open-circuited. This result is not quite the same as with all other elements absent,
except for canonical minimum scattering antennas.
-
•
If the array consists of non-isotropic but identical elements, the effect of the primary
pattern can be accounted relatively easily. Since the radiation due to every element is
weighted by the primary pattern, the total radiation pattern of an array is the product
of the
primary pattern
(single antenna element) and the
Antenna Factor (AF).
Array Radiation Pattern = Primary Pattern x Array Factor
-
•
An important and useful parameter is the
scan impedance
; it is the impedance of an
antenna element as a function of
scan angles
, with all antenna elements excited by
the proper amplitude and phase. From this, the
scan reflection coefficient
can be
obtained. Array performance is then obtained by multiplying the isolated element
power pattern (normalized to 0dB max), times the isotropic array factor, times the
impedance mismatch factor (1-
|Γ
2
|).
-
•
An array antenna of identical elements, with identical magnitudes, and with a
progressive phase is called a
Uniform Array Antenna.
Frequency Scanning - Beam Squint
W
hen a wavefront approaches an array of elements, there’s a time delay between
elements based on the wavefront angle
θ
relative to broadside radiation.
-
•
For a single frequency, the beam steering can be accomplished by replacing the time
delay with a phase shift. This works for narrow-band waveforms, but for wideband
waveforms, where the beam steering is produced by a phase shift, the beam can shift
direction as a function of frequency.
Such a situation can be intuitively explained if is acknowledged that a time delay is a linear
phase shift vs. frequency.
-
•
Thus, for a given beam direction, the phase shift required changes as a function of
frequency.
-
•
Or, inversely, for a given phase shift, the beam direction changes as a function of
frequency.
-
•
The concept of the beam angle changing as a function of frequency is called
Beam
Squint
.
Previously, was shown that the phase shift
ΔФ
applied to the elements across the array
antenna as a function of beam angle is:
where:
d
is the distance between antennas,
ϴ
is the beam angle, and
λ
is the wavelength.
Inversely, can compute the beam angle as a function of the phase shift:
The phase in the last equation is periodic and repeats every
2
π
.
Using equations above, the beam direction deviation (beam squint
Δϴ
) can be calculated:
where:
f
o
is the center frequency,
f
o
/f
is the frequency deviation, and
ϴ
o
is the angle at
f
o
.
A few observations on beam squint:
-
•
As the beam angle increases away from broadside, so too does the deviation in
beam angle vs. frequency.
-
•
A frequency below the center frequency causes a larger deviation than a frequency
above the center frequency.
-
•
A frequency below the center frequency moves the beam further away from
broadside.
-
•
The beam squint, or deviation in steering angle vs. frequency, is caused by
approximating a time delay with a phase shift.
Implementing
beam steering
with
true time-delay
units doesn’t have this problem
.
-
•
In
digital beamforming
, true time delay can be implemented in the DSP logic and
digital beamforming algorithms. Therefore, a phased array architecture in which every
element is digitized would lend itself naturally to overcome the beam-squint problem.
-
•
In
hybrid beamforming
, there’s a combination of ana
log beamforming for subarrays
followed by digital beamforming for the full array. This can offer some natural beam
squint mitigation worth considering. Beam squint is only subject to the subarray,
which is a much wider beamwidth, so it’s more tolerant to a
beam-angle deviation.
Thus, if the subarray beam squint is tolerable, then the hybrid beamforming
architecture can be implemented with phase shifters in the subarrays, followed by
true time delay in the digital beamforming.
Grating Lobes of Phased Array Antenna
-
•
Grating Lobes
are unwanted beams in most applications since they transmit and
receive energy in unwanted directions. The power radiated by the antenna array gets
divided between the main beam and the grating lobe. The power efficiency in the
direction of the main beam is consequently reduced.
Array Antennas with inter-element spacing
d
greater than the wavelength
λ
,
always have Grating Lobes (multiple main beams or fringes).
-
•
A phased array antenna may have several radiating lobes of peak intensities
comparable with that of the desired beam. Such undesired radiating lobes are known
as
grating lobes
.
-
•
The
grating lobes should not be confused with the side lobes
.
Usually, a side lobe has much lower peak intensity than that of a grating lobe.
Grating lobes of two-element antenna array
-
•
The antenna pattern of an antenna element (which forms the array) may reduce the
grating lobes to acceptable levels and allow a wider element spacing.
-
•
To avoid grating lobes the array antenna should be designed so that the maximum
distance between antennas
d
max
to be:
where
β
max
is the largest phase difference, and
ϴ
max
is the scan angle that maximize the
phase difference
β
where the first grating lobe occur.
-
•
Making the element spacing
d
max
less than
λ/2
will ensure that no grating lobes occur
for any scan angle.
-
•
To ensure that there are no grating lobes, the separation between the antenna
elements should not be equal to multiples of a wavelength, otherwise additional
maxima will appear.
-
•
In a multi-element transmitting array antenna, to reduce the sidelobe levels,
don't have to drive the outer antenna elements harder than the inner elements.
-
•
Thus, for side lobe reduction, this can be mitigated through various methods: by using
non-uniform antenna element spacing, by applying an amplitude taper over the array,
leveraging windowing techniques already known from designing finite impulse
response (FIR) filters, or using genetic algorithms.
-
•
Grating lobes occur in an array antenna when the spacing between elements is great
enough to permit all the elements to add in phase in one or more directions other
than the direction of the main lobe.
-
•
A grating lobe differs from an ordinary side lobe. Side lobes are the result of
constructive and destructive interference from different radiating parts of the antenna.
-
•
The level of a side lobe is always below that of the main beam
.
-
•
A grating lobe is due to the periodicity in the radiation pattern and is formed in
directions where a maximum in-phase addition of radiated fields occurs.
-
•
A grating lobe should be compared with the main beam instead of to an ordinary side
lobe. The level of a grating lobe is equal to that of the main beam, since a grating
lobe is a repeated main beam.
the grating lobe itself, copies of the radiation pattern around broadside.
The Ordinary End-fire Array
-
•
The Ordinary End-fire Array Antenna is a type of array antenna designed to radiate or
receive energy primarily along its axis, in the "end-fire" direction, which is typically
aligned with the array's linear axis.
-
•
Usually consists of multiple elements arranged in a straight line, and the antenna's
main lobe points along the axis of the array, either in the forward or backward
direction, depending on the design.
-
•
Proper phase differences are introduced between elements to reinforce radiation in
the end-fire direction through constructive interference. These phase differences
cause the radiated waves from each element to interfere constructively in the end-fire
direction.
-
•
In many applications, array antennas are required to produce a single
pencil beam
.
-
•
A
pencil beam array
is generally referred to as an array that produces narrow
beams. Thus, a pencil beam array exhibits maximum possible gain in a desired
direction.
-
•
Typically, the amplitude taper of such an array is decided by the sidelobe
requirement; thus, only the element phase is adjusted to maximize the array gain.
-
•
The array factor for a broadside array produces a fan beam, although the proper
selection of array elements may yield a total pattern that has a single pencil beam.
Another way to achieve a single pencil beam is by the proper design of an end-fire array.
Ordinary end-fire conditions to produce a single pencil beam are:
d <
λ
2
(1
−
1
2N
)
;
α = +/
-
βd
An array satisfying these conditions produces a single end-fire beam and no grating lobe
with a peak in the direction θ = 0° for α =
-
βd and in the direction θ = 180° for α = βd.
-
•
When increasing distances between antenna elements of the array antenna, the
beam gets narrower and, consequently, the pointing of the beam gets more accurate.
-
•
The narrowing of the beam is completely due to the fact that with the increase of the
element distance the aperture size increases and, since beamwidth is inversely
proportional to aperture size, the beam gets narrower.
Thinned Phased Array Antenna
-
•
Array antenna thinning
is a technique used in the design and optimization of
antenna arrays to reduce the number of active elements while maintaining desired
radiation patterns and performance characteristics. Essentially, it involves selectively
"turning OFF" or removing certain elements from a densely populated antenna array
to achieve benefits such as reduced cost, lower power consumption, and simplified
hardware without significantly compromising the array’s directivity, gain, or beam
shape.
-
•
A number of applications, as satellite receiving antennas or ground-based high-
frequency radars, require a narrow-scanned beam, but not commensurably high
antenna gain. Since the array beamwidth is related to the largest dimension of the
aperture, it is possible to remove many of the elements,
or to ‘‘thin’’
the array, without
significantly changing its beamwidth.
-
•
The array gain will be reduced in approximate proportion to the fraction of elements
removed, because the gain is related directly to the area of the illuminated aperture.
-
•
Elements are selectively deactivated or omitted based on algorithms that consider
factors like: mutual coupling, side lobe levels, and beam shape.
-
•
Thus, a
Thinned Array
can offer essentially the same beamwidth with less directivity
and fewer elements. Directivity is approximately equal to the number of elements
N
.
Mutual coupling effects are also significantly reduced.
-
•
The average sidelobe level (power) for a linear array antenna is
1/N
.
Regular
thinning
produces grating lobes, but these can be partially suppressed by
randomizing the element spacings.
A special kind of thinned array uses variable element spacing to produce an
equivalent amplitude taper. The goal is to produce a sidelobe that tapers down.
-
•
The thinned array procedure can make it possible to build a highly directive array
antenna with reduced gain for a fraction of the cost of a filled array.
-
•
The cost is further reduced by exciting the array antenna with a uniform illumination,
thus saving the cost of a complex power divider network.
a periodic lattice in order to obtain a
spatial taper
that results in low sidelobes.
The normalized desired amplitude taper serves as a probability density function for a
uniform array that is to be thinned.
-
•
The elements that are turned OFF are connected to a matched load and deliver no
signal to form a beam. The elements that are turned OFF are not removed from the
aperture, so the element lattice is not disturbed.
-
•
In a thinned array antenna, the elements either have an amplitude of
one
or
zero
.
Elements with an amplitude of one are connected to the feed network, while elements
with an amplitude of zero are connected to a matched load and do not contribute to a
signal to the array output.
-
•
Elements that correspond to a high amplitude have a greater probability of being
turned ON than those that correspond to a low-sidelobe amplitude taper.
-
•
This type of taper has some
advantages
including:
-
-
It is a cheap method to implement an
amplitude taper
. Designing, building, and
testing low-sidelobe feed networks is expensive. Thinned arrays use cheap
uniform feed networks.
-
-
A
narrow beamwidth
for a smaller number of active elements. Active elements
are more expensive, especially if each element has a transmitter and/or a
receiver, resulting in a
lower power consumption
and reduced manufacturing
and maintenance
costs
.
-
-
Reduced
mutual coupling
effects. The mutual coupling is more well-defined
than for an array with variable element spacing. Knowing the mutual coupling
effects makes the array antenna more predictable and easier to design.
-
-
Potentially lighter and more compact antenna systems.
-
•
Thinning
works best for
large array antennas
, since the statistics are more reliable
for a large number of elements. It is used in radar systems, satellite communications,
wireless networks, and other systems where large antenna arrays are employed but
resource constraints necessitate optimization.
-
•
As a trade-off, thinning can lead to increased side lobes or other undesired effects if
not carefully designed.
Nonuniformly Spaced Array Antennas
Sidelobe synthesis of array antennas could be done also by variation of antenna
elements
spacings
, designing a
nonuniformly spaced array antenna
.
-
•
Thinned array antennas (described above) have a large but finite number of possible
active element locations.
-
•
In contrast, nonuniformly spaced (or aperiodic arrays) have an infinite number of
possible element locations.
-
•
All elements in nonuniformly spaced arrays are active.
-
•
In nonuniformly spaced arrays, the optimum spacing between the array antenna
elements are obtained using firefly algorithms. Numerical analysis is performed to
calculate the far-field radiation characteristics of the array antenna.
Initial attempts at nonuniformly spaced arrays were based upon trial and error.
-
•
The minimum allowed distance between the antenna elements is defined in such a
way that mutual coupling between the elements can be ignored.
-
•
Mutual coupling effects between antenna elements are easier to characterize for
periodic spacing than for aperiodic spacing.
-
•
Thinned arrays with periodic spacing are more desirable than nonuniformly spaced
arrays, because the feed network for the thinned arrays is much easier to design.
-
•
Also, implementing nonuniform spacing on planar arrays is extremely difficult.
Mutual Coupling between Antenna Elements
-
•
The electromagnetic environment of an antenna element in isolation is different from
that prevailing when the same antenna element is placed near the array center or at
the array's perimeter.
-
•
The presence of surrounding elements alters the current distribution on each element
and the field radiated by an excited element is dependent on the induced currents on
other elements as well as its own.
-
•
The
interaction between elements
quickly falls to zero as elements become widely
spaced.
At a separation greater than one wavelength, the interaction is usually
considered negligible
. In an array where the interelement spacing is half a
wavelength, significant couplings exist between an element and its nearest and
nearest-but-one neighbors.
-
•
The antenna elements in a real array antenna are not isotropic or isolated sources.
The array element radiation pattern is determined as a pattern taken with a feed at a
single element in the array, and all other elements are terminated by the matched
loads.
-
•
The patte
rn of an “
active element
”
is different from the pattern of an isolated array
element, which reveals the radiation pattern of an array element in free space without
coupling from “neighbor
elements
”.
-
•
The antenna pattern of an active array element depends on the position of the
element in the array: antenna patterns of edge elements differ from the patterns of
elements center located.
Example
: if we place two antenna elements (
A
and
B
) nearby, the resulting antenna
coupling will affect both antenna radiations and their terminal properties as is mentioned
-
•
Behavior in
Transmit mode:
If the antenna
A
is driven with a signal, the radiated field by antenna
A
and
intercepted by antenna
B
, will cause also a radiation from antenna
B
.
Hence, the total radiation is a combination of
A
and
B
antenna elements, so the
effective radiation when we drive antenna
A
is thus changed.
Power radiated by antenna element
B
is intercepted again by antenna
A
, which
results in changes of current flowing to antenna
A
, so the input impedance of
antenna element
A
is modified.
-
•
Behavior in
Receive mode:
-
-
If a received plane wave impinges on antenna
A
, current will flow on antenna
A
,
power will be reradiated (scattered) by antenna
A
, some reradiated power from
antenna
A
is received by antenna
B
, which will cause radiation by antenna
B
.
Further, some power will be received by antenna
A
, thus the current on antenna
A
is modified (so the input impedance of the antenna element
A
is modified).
- the radiation patterns of the antenna elements.
- the distribution of the antenna elements near-fields.
- the spacing between antenna elements.
- antenna elements loading.
This effect can lead to a
poor impedance match
and often, depending on the feed
mechanism, to a
poor aperture illumination
and increase of sidelobes.
-
•
The array antenna inter-element coupling effects may produce
increased sidelobes
,
main
beam squi
nt, increased main
beamwidth
,
shifted nulls
, and
array blindness
for some scan angles.
-
•
Gain
,
Polarization
, and
Far-field pattern
, are also affected by the mutual coupling.
-
•
Therefore, it is very important to study the array antenna parameters, including inter-
elements
mutual coupling effects
.
-
•
The far-field pattern is an indicator of coupling between elements, although the
coupling mechanism is a near-field, not far-field effect.
-
•
Coupling is proportional to the element pattern level in the array plane (or surface).
Antenna elements with a narrow pattern will have lower coupling than antenna
elements with a broad beam.
-
•
Antenna elements with polarization (i.e., electric field orientations) that are parallel
one to each other, couple more than when they are collinear.
-
•
Mutual coupling is especially important problem when the number of antenna
elements is small often excluding the use of conventional beam synthesis techniques.
-
•
Mutual coupling
doesn’t
change the amplitude and phase distribution for corporate
fed arrays, but it will change the amplitude distribution in series fed array antennas.
-
•
The phase slope is an important factor in mutual coupling.
The
impedance match
is very dependent on the
phase slope
.
-
•
The difference in amplitude between adjacent radiator elements in an array antenna
is usually small and can be ignored.
-
•
Mutual coupling in the E-plane for dipole elements is small and sometimes is ignored.
Similarly, mutual coupling for slot elements is small in the H-plane.
-
•
For patch antennas arrays, altering patch geometry, like using fractal patches,
reduces mutual coupling. The choice of technique depends on factors like frequency
range, available space, cost, and performance objectives.
-
•
An antenna element cannot be characterized on reflection using passive elements to
simulate mutual coupling conditions.
-
•
An active element radiation pattern surrounded by others elements can be described
using coupling scattering coefficients (S parameters).
Impedance matrix of the antenna array contains all the inter-element mutual
impedances.
-
•
In principle, the mutual impedances, are calculated between two antenna elements,
with all the other elements open circuited.
Mutual impedance is computed by placing a generator on the input of one antenna,
finding the voltage appearing at the input terminals of the second antenna, and then
taking the ratio of the voltage to the current. The mutual impedance values decrease
with increasing separation distance between antenna elements.
A second way to quantify coupled arrays in addition to the mutual impedance
approach is to use the scattering parameter method that is commonly used in RF
circuit analysis.
-
•
The analysis of mutually-coupled antennas in a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)
antenna array system is performed in two folds:
-
•
Mutual coupling between the antenna elements causes the
active impedance
and
the
returned power
to vary with
excitation phase
.
The returned power is caused by departure from conjugate match between the
antenna element impedance and the generator impedance.
The element active impedance is the impedance measured while all the other
elements are excited with the appropriate phase.
-
•
The active impedance of each element in a practical phased array varies with scan
angle, because of mutual coupling between the elements.
-
•
The associated mismatch causes power to be returned to the generators, thereby
reducing the gain realized by the array and by the element.
Also, the element pattern, measured in the proper environment of surrounding
elements, deviates from the ideal pattern in proportion to this effect.
-
•
Mutual coupling is inherently unavoidable in a closely-spaced array of elements.
-
•
There is a loss of antenna element efficiency caused by the mutual coupling, and
since coupling increases with closer spacing, this accounts for the lower gain
expected from ideal antenna elements with reduced allotted area.
Examples of impedance measurements for coupling between antenna elements
-
•
Table below shows the variation of the reactive portion (j) vs number of elements, of a
central antenna element.
The antenna elements of the array are λ/4 monopoles.
|
No. rows
|
No.
columns
|
Total number
of elements
|
Reactive portion of
impedance (ohms)
|
|
3
|
3
|
9
|
+j5.9
|
|
5
|
5
|
25
|
+j3.2
|
|
7
|
7
|
49
|
+j2.4
|
|
9
|
9
|
81
|
+j2.1
|
|
11
|
11
|
121
|
+j2.0
|
|
25
|
25
|
625
|
+j1.8
|
Reactive impedance of a central antenna element vs array size
Conclusions:
-
-
The reactive impedance portion (j) decreases when the number of array elements
increases as shown in table above.
-
-
T
he impedance of the λ/4 monopole with λ/2 spacing tends to be purely resistive as
the number of surrounding loaded monopoles increases.
-
-
The resistive part of the impedance is relative insensitive to the array size.
|
Element position
|
Reactive portion of
impedance (ohms)
|
|
Center element (0,0)
|
+j2
|
|
Edge element of the center row
|
+j7
|
|
Corner element
|
+j12
|
|
Isolated element (Reference)
|
+j21
|
Reactive impedance of an antenna element as a function of its location in a 11x11 array
Conclusions:
-
-
The imaginary (reactive) part of the input impedance (j) varies with element position.
-
-
Calculations shows that the real (resistive) input impedance portion is relatively
insensitive to element position in the 11x11 element array.
-
•
Table below presents the experimentally measured coupling scattering S-parameters
for the central row elements in a linear a
ntenna array (λ/4 monopoles, 11x
1 elements)
operating at 1.3 GHz. Data shows the coupling coefficient S
0n
between the central
active monopole marked as number 0 and the n
th
element in row.
The distance between the adjacent elements i
s about half of the wavelength λ/2.
|
Element #
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
S
0n
(dB)
|
-10
|
-22
|
-32
|
-38
|
-43
|
Coupling coefficient (in dB) between central array element and the element number n
Conclusions:
-
-
The measurements show that the coupling between adjacent elements is about
10dB, while the coupling value between the central and 5
th
element is 43dB.
-
•
The beam of multiple-feed antenna elements is controlled by changing the phase and
amplitude of the signals going into the various antenna feeds.
-
•
An antenna array system must account not only for the interaction that occurs
between the antenna elements, but also for the interaction that occurs on their driving
feed networks.
-
•
The antenna pattern is changed by setting the input power and relative phasing at its
various ports. At the same time, the input impedances at the ports change with the
antenna pattern. Since input impedance affects the performance of the nonlinear
driving circuit, the changing antenna pattern affects the overall system performance.
EM simulation software
is commonly used to simulate antennas with multiple feeds,
including phased arrays, stacked radiators with different polarizations, and single
apertures with multiple feed points.
-
•
An EM simulation software enables communication between the circuit and antenna,
thus automatically accounting for the coupling between the circuit and the antenna in
an easy-to-use framework.
-
•
The EM simulation is necessary because the antenna elements interact with each
other, which can significantly deg
rade the antenna’s performance.
An extreme example of this is
scan blindness
, where the interaction between the
elements causes no radiation to occur at certain scan angles.
-
•
The coupling between the elements can also lead to resonances in the feed network.
In order to optimize the feed network to account for deficiencies in the antenna, the
entire array antenna combined with the entire feeding circuit must be optimized.
It is critical to simulate the feed network itself since resonances can build up due to
the loading at the antenna ports.
Frequency Bandwidth of Array Antenna
In both effects, it is the path-length differences that contribute to the frequency
bandwidth sensitivity of a phased array.
For a parallel-fed array (equal line length), the feed network does not contribute to a
change in phase with frequency, and so only the aperture effect remains.
-
•
Frequency Bandwidth of an array antenna is affected by many factors, including
change of element input impedances with frequency, change of array spacing in
wavelengths that may allow grating lobes, change in element beamwidth, and so on.
-
•
When an array antenna is scanned with fixed units of phase shift, provided by
phasers, there is also a frequency bandwidth limitation as the position of the main
beam will change with frequency.
-
•
When the array antenna is scanned with time-delay circuits, the beam position is
independent of frequency to first order.
-
•
An array antenna, where the antenna elements are fed in parallel (corporate feed)
and scanned by phase shift, modulo 2
π
, has limited frequency bandwidth:
for wideband operation, constant lengths rather than constant phases are required.
The approximate limit is given by:
Bandwidth (%)
≈
Beamwidth (°)
-
•
For wider frequency bandwidths, time-delay networks have to be introduced to
supplement the phase shifters.
-
•
However, phased array antennas have the potential of operating over very wide
frequency bandwidths. The high-end of the frequency bandwidth is limited by the
physical size of the antenna elements, which must be spaced close enough in the
array to avoid generation of grating lobes.
-
•
For wide instantaneous bandwidth (rather than tunable bandwidth), the time-delay
circuits have to be added to prevent the beam from being scanned as the frequency
is changed.
-
•
The impedance of the radiating antenna element at the aperture (with closely spaced
elements) is approximately independent of frequency, but the element must be
matched over the wide bandwidth. This is difficult to achieve without exciting harmful
surface waves when scanning. Impedance matching with one octave bandwidth for
scanning angles +/- 60° could be obtaining in practice.
Antenna Element Failure Analysis
For example, a rectangular 16x4 array antenna
with λ/2 spaced elements, if some of
the antenna elements fails working, the antenna array pattern will change, as is shown in
the plots below.
Antenna pattern of a 16x4 array antenna with failing elements
Array Element failure, always results in side lobe response degradation.
-
•
In a Phased Array Antenna by
adding amplitude control
, the phased array can form
multiple beams with beamwidths determined by the entire size of the array.
-
•
The beam shape of the Phased Array Antenna is determined by the
element size
and also by the
element shape
.
-
•
Each radiating element in an array antenna receives a portion of the power radiated
by the other elements in transmit, or scatters power into neighboring elements in
reception. The
transmitted and the received antenna patterns are identical
, so
the problem can be analyzed either way.
-
•
The radiation from each antenna element excites currents on its neighboring
elements that also radiate.
-
•
In a Phased Array Antenna,
the effective element pattern changes
due to
scattering of power from neighboring elements.
-
•
This leads to mutual coupling, which we describe and analyze by mutual impedance
(admittance, or scattering) matrices. This phenomenon causes the
input impedance
of the antenna elements to change as we scan the antenna array
.
-
•
The mutual coupling can lead to
scan blindness
when the feed reflection coefficient
grows due to mutual coupling, and the array totally reflects the signal into the feed
network. If we want the exact pattern designed for, we must compensate the feeding
coefficients for the mutual coupling.
Scan Blindness
-
•
The phenomenon of scan blindness in phased array antennas is a condition that
results from array elements mutual coupling and can bring about essentially complete
cancellation of the antenna radiated beam at certain scan angles.
-
•
Scan blindness has been observed to occur in microstrip patch arrays or microstrip
dipoles when the combination of dielectric constant and substrate thickness is such
as to support a tightly bound surface wave, one with a phase velocity that is
sufficiently slow so that it couples to an array grating lobe. A particular case is
illustrated by arrays of microstrip patches etched on dielectric substrates.
-
•
In
Patch Array Antennas
the surface coupling existing between antenna elements
can sometimes lead to
scan blindness
, in which case, effectively, at some scan
angles no power is transmitted or received by the array antenna.
Scan Blindness Phenomenon
-
•
Some authors correlated the TM surface wave propagation constant with the
observed blindness angle. The dielectric layer itself supports a surface wave, and
although the boundary conditions are perturbed by the array patch or dipole structure,
the location of the blindness is often predicted very accurately by the surface wave
propagation constant.
-
•
The
scan blindness in phased arrays
is the serious problem of having most of the
electromagnetic energy reflected back to the feed source at certain scan angles.
In the transmitting case, when the feed network is configured to steer the beam to a
blind scan angle there is power reflected back into the transmitter, which can cause
damage.
-
•
In finite arrays, the blindness effect does not yield complete mismatch, but there can
still be significant mismatch in large arrays.
-
•
That scan blindness problem is very serious in microstrip phased arrays. In fact, the
scan blindness severely appears in the
relatively thick substrate
arrays where the
surface waves have more pronounced effects. Using relatively thick substrates
however, is needed to increase the fractional bandwidth of the phased array antenna
in order to meet the required specifications for certain applications. Therefore, there is
always a trade-off between the required impedance bandwidth and scan range (Field
of View
–
FOV) in such microstrip phased arrays. When the substrate thickness is
set, the antenna designer can substantially vary the array's scan blindness angle by
slightly varying the interelement spacing.
-
•
Fundamental scanning characteristics of an array antenna consisting of microstrip
antennas as: the reflection coefficient, input resistance trends, scan blindness, and
grating lobe effects, are dictated by the interelement spacings and substrate
parameters (height and relative permittivity) and not by the nature of the microstrip
antenna element (e.g. microstrip patches or microstrip dipoles).
-
•
The scan blindness can also occur with
electrically thin substrates
. Relatively thin
substrates tend to increase the scan blindness angle.
True scan blindness
is
defined as the scan angle at which the magnitude of reflection coefficient becomes
unity.
-
•
True scan blindness does not occur in infinite arrays, but a severe mismatch in input
impedance or, equivalently, a significant dip in the active element pattern generally
takes place at a scan angle where the infinite array is blind.
-
•
The blindness mechanism is explained as a "forced surface wave" or as a "leaky
wave", resonant response of the slow wave structure by the phased array. Since the
grounded dielectric substrate of the printed patch array supports a slow surface, scan
blindness may occur. At this scan angle, all the power incident on the array is trapped
in the non-radiating surface wave, resulting in total reflection.
-
•
The existence of two or more surface waves on the substrate will lead to multiple
regions of scan blindness.
-
•
At scan blindness, the
input impedance
of any patch in the array has a
zero real
part
and
very large reactive part
. The patches are thus open circuited and this is
the reason why the resonant modes of the array at scan blindness correspond closely
to the modes of a grounded ferrite substrate with no printed conductor on the surface.
-
•
To obtain compact size and wide bandwidth, a substrate with higher permittivity and a
thicker profile has been extensively used in the microstrip array antenna design.
However, this substrate results in the increased
surface wave
excitation.
In a microstrip array antenna, the severe surface waves increase the mutual coupling
between array elements, which cause impedance and pattern anomalies associated
with
scan blindness.
The interaction between antenna elements degrades S-parameters, and as a result,
the scan blindness of the radiation pattern for the adjacent coupled elements in the
array increases.
The mutual coupling can result in severe degradation to
the antenna’s radiation
characteristics. While surface waves are weakly excited in very thin grounded
dielectric substrates, space-waves dominate and show strong coupling when
antennas are in close proximity.
It can usually be avoided by using smaller element spacings, and very careful use of
dielectric substrates or superstrates, or any coupling structures like transmission lines
and baluns at the array face.
-
•
If have a wide element spacing (approaching a wavelength), the number of elements
will be reduced and the associated costs for elements and the feed network also will
be reduced.
However, the maximum scan angle limits how far apart elements can be in order to
avoid grating lobes as given by and to avoid scan blindness.
-
•
Techniques to minimize this phenomenon in a microstrip phased array antenna,
range from substrate modifications, surrounding the radiating elements by
electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) or periodic bandgap (PBG) structures, employing
shorting posts, or using defected ground structures (DGS), to adding cavities
underneath the radiating elements. DGS causing suppression in mutual coupling,
does not affect other characteristics such as co-polarized radiation over principal
planes, gain, and input impedance compared to other approaches with conventional
microstrip patch. Moreover, using DGS will imply also undesired backward radiation.
-
•
The scan blindness of the microstrip phased array built on high dielectric constant
substrate (e.g. Er = 10.2 and thickness h=0.054*
λ
o
) can be significantly eliminated
and the E-plane scan range could be enhanced from 40º to 50º. However, that would
come at the cost of the bandwidth.
-
•
Using cavities to back the radiating elements, shows a great potential in eliminating
the scan blindness. The utilization of cavities on relatively thick substrates efficiently
suppresses the surface waves securing both wide scan performance and wide
bandwidth of operation. For example, using a low dielectric substrate of Er = 2.5 and
thickness h = 0.08*
λ
o
, a scan range of 85º in the E-plane could be realized with the
cavity-backed topology, compared to only about 48º without the cavity (as in
microstrip case), which is a quite an improvement.
Realization problem of cavity-backed structures require a two-step fabrication
process; one is the conventional PCB process to print the planar radiating elements
and the other is a CNC machining or metal casting processing in order to fabricate
the waveguide metalized cavities.
Array Factor plots for Phased Array Antennas
In 1937
George Brown
working for RCA published for the first time the
array factor
plots
for Phased Array Antennas with two isotropic elements with equal amplitude
excitations for various combinations of excitation phase
α
, and element spacing,
d
.
The plots also show a unit circle (dashed) representing the radiation from a hypothetical
isotropic point source with the same input current.
Patterns of Phased Array Antennas with two isotropic elements (G.Borrow)
Sparse Array Antennas
The arrangement of the antenna elements on the array aperture is chosen such that
the synthesized continuous aperture current distribution can be sampled optimally in a
discrete manner.
This can be done either by placing the unequally fed elements at equal intervals
separated by a half-
wavelength (λ/2) or smaller, or by placing equally fed elements at
nonuniform separations. The former category is called the
Dense Antenna Arrays (DAA)
and the latter one is called the
aperiodic or nonuniform antenna arrays
.
-
•
Aperiodic Antenna Arrays
in general may also be referred to as
Sparse Antenna
Arrays (SAA)
and will be referred as such going forward.
-
•
A
Sparse Array Antenna
is an array in which
many antenna elements have a
value of zero
. Sparse arrays need fewer antenna elements than Uniform Linear
Arrays (ULA) to realize a given aperture.
-
•
Sparse array antennas have aperture widths equal to full array antennas but are
sparsely populated
.
-
•
Sparse array antennas were developed to increase cost efficiency by reducing the
number of array antenna elements, with the performance degradation being relatively
small or even close to the performance of conventional arrays.
The configuration of the sparse array design is widely needed in various practical
communication systems that have limited antenna size and weight, as well as cost
efficiencies, such as radar equipment, satellite communications, and other space
communications.
-
•
Failure or absence of either the first antenna element or the last element in an
array of
N
elements reduces the array aperture by one unit. Failure of both
antenna elements reduces the array aperture by two units.
Hence, in the analysis
of thinned/sparse arrays, or when analyzing arrays with elements failures, it is
generally assumed that the first and the last antenna elements are always functional,
intact and active so that the array aperture is preserved.
-
•
A sparse array antenna contains substantially fewer driven radiating elements than a
conventional uniformly spaced array with the same beamwidth having identical
elements. Interelement spacings in the sparse array antenna can be chosen such
that no large grating lobes are formed and sidelobes (Side Lobe Level - SLL) are
reduced.
-
•
A sparse array antenna has an average element spacing greater than λ
.
-
•
Sparse arrays have grating lobes in the far field pattern due to the large spacing of
elements residing in a rectangular or triangular grid.
Random element spacing
removes the grating lobes
but produces large variations in element density across
the aperture. In fact, some areas are so dense that the elements will overlap.
-
•
Side Lobe Level SLL is inversely proportional to the aperture length and the number
of elements.
-
•
The SLL envelope is almost constant with respect to the variation of the scan angle.
-
•
Sparse array antenna directivity is directly proportional to the number of active
elements.
-
•
Low Discrepancy Sequence (LDS) method could be used for generating the element
spacing in sparse planar arrays. This nonrandom alternative finds an element layout
that reduces the grating lobes while maintaining and keeping the elements far enough
apart (average element spacing larger than λ) for practical construction. From a
practical fabrication perspective, it's needed that the elements are distributed on the
aperture in a manner that the physical antenna elements do not touch.
LDS arrays could use about 80% less elements than a fully populated array on a
square grid.
A
random distribution of elements in the sparse array lowers the grating lobes
to a level of the surrounding sidelobes
.
-
•
For a given number of antenna elements, sparse array antennas provide larger
apertures and higher degrees of freedom than full arrays (e.g., ability to detect more
source signals through direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation).
-
•
Another
advantage of sparse arrays is that they are less affected by mutual
coupling
compared to Uniform Linear Arrays (due to larger average distance
between antenna elements).
-
•
For a dense array, thinning (removing elements from a regular grid) and aperiodic
spacing (spacing between elements are not constant) imitate low sidelobe amplitude
distributions through an amplitude density across the aperture.
-
•
Sparse array antennas have far field patterns with low sidelobes near the main beam
and increased sidelobe levels farther from the main beam.
-
•
The fragility of a sparse array antenna gives a measure of how vulnerable the
array antenna is to its’ element’s failures
. Fragility is defined as the number of
essential elements to the total number of elements in the sparse array.
An antenna element is said to be essential if its failure/absence alters or introduces
holes into the antenna pattern.
Sparse array antenna design techniques can be classified as:
- Mathematical calculation methods and structured algorithms,
- Probability statistics and stochastic processes,
- Polynomial factorization method,
- a combinatory mathematical method by using cyclic different sets,
- Low Discrepancy Sequence method,
- Mutual coupling effects method,
- Fourier transform-based techniques,
- Deterministic methodologies,
- Hybridization of the above techniques.
Sparse Array antenna optimization methods:
- Gradient-based optimizers,
- Array thinning,
- Convex optimization,
- Random sampling,
- Utilize special array structures.
-
•
The design method for sparse array antennas is based on either traditional synthesis
methods (mentioned above) or trial and error. A genetic algorithm could be used to
determine the positions of the transmit and receive array elements by setting the
ambiguity function of the virtual array as the match function.
-
•
A common mistake in sparse array antenna design is that the design is focus solely
on the mathematical aspect of antenna array synthesis and neglect the
electromagnetic (EM) portion of antenna array design.
Advantages of Sparse Array Antennas:
-
-
Disruption of periodicity in the placement of antenna elements in the array alleviates
the onset of the grating lobes.
-
-
Larger separations between the array elements leads to a reduction in the mutual
coupling, thus having a minimal impact on the antenna performance. Place the
elements far enough away from each other so that the array can be fabricable.
-
-
Sparse arrays achieve high taper efficiency for SLL reduction, closer in comparison to
the amplitude tapered conventional antenna arrays.
-
-
The reduction in the number of elements in the fixed array aperture compared to the
conventional antenna arrays leads to reduction in size, weight, aperture, and power-
cost (SWAP-C) resources.
Disadvantages of Sparse Array Antennas:
-
-
The reduction in the number of elements leads to the reduction in the directive gain of
array.
-
-
Irregular array antenna elements placement complicates the realization of the RF
feed circuitry in the back end of the array in case of phased array antennas.
-
-
Side Lobe Level SLL reduction is proportional to the number of elements, so for
ultralow sidelobe level (lesser than −30dB to −40dB), a large number of elements
leading to a bigger array aperture are required.
-
-
More sensitive to element failure than full array antennas.
The sparse array antenna configuration can be synthesized based on the desired radiation
pattern. This pattern is generated based on the phase excitation parameters of each
element, the amplitude, and the relative phase difference between the array elements.
Example of Sparse Array Antenna design:
The configuration of a sparse array antenna is designed by developing a 9-element sparse
array, as shown in figure below:
9-element sparse array antenna
Determination of the distance between the elements of the sparse array could be carried
out using equation:
d
n
= 1/I
n
where:
d
n
is the coefficient of distance between array elements, and
I
n
is the excitation
coefficient of each element amplitude.
Furthermore, the amplitude current excitation coefficient will be transformed to the element
spacing coefficient for each element and multiplied by the ideal distance between array
elements λ/2.
This parameter is the coefficient for determining the distance of each element in the sparse
array configuration and determining its location in the sparse array arrangement.
The process of this method starts by determining the aperture length of the sparse array
antenna configuration and calculating the distance coefficient between elements
d
n
for each
array element. Then, we calculate the number of elements that match the aperture length,
then multiply the distance coefficient
d
n
by the distance between standard elements λ/2,
and finally set up a linear configuration of the sparse antenna array from the result of
multiplying the distance coefficient by λ/2.
The radiation pattern produced by this 9-element sparse array antenna configuration has a
main lobe magnitude of 25.1dB with a half power bandwidth (HPBW) of 0.5° and a peak
SLL performance of −33.4dB. These results show a significant improvement when
compared to the conventional uniform spacing array configuration with equal aperture,
which has the main lobe magnitude of 19.6dB with HPBW 3.8° and a peak SLL of −13.3dB.
Phase Shifters used in Electronically Controlled Phased Array Antennas
-
•
Phase Array Antennas are controlled by
phase shifters
,
switches
, and
attenuators
.
-
•
Phased Array systems generally comprise a plurality of radiating elements each of
which generally has a
phase shifter
associated therewith.
-
•
In the transmit mode the phase shifters determine the direction of the radiated beam
emitted by electronically changing the amount of phase shift produced by these
phase shifters the beam can made to scan a preselected spatial volume.
-
•
In practice, the transmitted beam scans a spatial volume in incremental steps.
The
scanning accuracy
of a given volume is dependent upon the size of the
incremental step or the
phase shift per step
of the phase shifters.
-
•
The
resolution
of a received signal in a phased array is dependent upon the
size of
the incremental steps
of the phase shifter, since the
phase error
between adjacent
elements is usually a fixed percentage of the magnitude of the bit of the phase shifter.
A given radiated beam has side lobes caused by these errors.
-
•
These side lobes reduce the energy contained in a transmitted beam and decrease
the signal to noise ratio in the received return.
-
•
Hence, one method of increasing the energy in the main transmitted beam and
increasing the signal to noise ratio of the signal received, is to reduce the phase
shifter errors between adjacent elements.
This can be effectively accomplished by reducing the magnitude of the incremental
steps, more steps are needed to provide the proper amount of total phase shift from
the phase shifter.
-
•
So, one of the most important components have been the
phase shifters
, but more
recently
variable amplitude control
has become important as well.
-
•
The first components for phase control were waveguide ferrite phase shifters, but
diode devices, transistor circuits, MEMS switches, and ferroelectric phase shifters are
all finding applications.
Many phase shifters are analog devices, wherein the differential phase between
states is a function of voltage or pulse length or some other analog parameter.
-
•
Ferrite phase shifters can handle high power from S-band to 60GHz and beyond.
Ferrites phase shifters can offer a variety of switching speeds, starting at about one
microsecond for toroid designs, and insertion loss as low as 0.5dB.
-
•
A linear antenna array system consists of N equally spaced identical elements.
Each phase shifter has a special electrical control circuit that can change
progressively the phase of the received (or transmitted) signal.
-
•
Radiation pattern and the beam direction can be changed using
Analog Phase
Shifters
that vary their phases continuously from 0° to 360°. Such electronically
controllable phase shifters are very expensive and typically are not used in practice.
-
•
Most of the Phase Shifters are digitally controlled, named
Digital Phase Shifters
.
Digital Phase Shifters
realize phase shifts with a discrete difference equal to
Δ
= 2
Π
/ 2
q
, where
q
is the number of bits, and
2
q
is the number of states of the
digital phase shifter.
Digital Phase Shifters
–
Number of phase steps vs Number of bits
A two-bit phase shifter (q=2) provides four phase states within the phase range:
0°-360° (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°), with discrete steps of
90°
(360° / 4).
The array factor value does not change for scan angles from 21° to 30° and from
30.5° to 40.5°.
A three-bit phase shifter (q=3) gives eight possible phase states starting from 0° to
360°, with discrete steps of
45°
(360° / 8). (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, 315°)
The beam pointing remains constant for the angular ranges: 43°-49° and 49°-55.5°.
-
-
A
four-bit
phase shifter (q=4) corresponds to
16 possible phase steps
with a
discrete step equal to
22.5°
(360° / 16). (0°, 22.5°, 45°, 67.5°, 90°, 112.5°, 135°,
157.5°, 180°, 202.5°, 225°, 247.5°, 270°, 292.5°, 315°, 337.5°).
-
-
A
five-bit
(q=5) digital phase shifter have
32 discrete steps
with
11.25°
phase
resolution (360° / 32).
-
-
A
six-bit
(q=6) digital phase shifter have
64 discrete steps
with
5.625°
phase
resolution (360° / 64).
-
•
Due to the nature of the stepped phase shift introduced by the
digital phase
shifters
, it will be a
phase error function
that will affect the main beam and the side
lobes of the array antenna.
Phase error due to digital phase shift steps
It is seen that the error between the ideal curve and its approximation is a periodic
function of the X coordinate.
-
•
Periodic phase errors cause main lobe attenuation, produce a set of lobes called
‘‘
quantization lobes
’’, and cause error in the main beam
pointing position.
Quantization lobe values depend only on the scanning angle position and do not
depend on the array amplitude distribution.
-
•
Since the array is itself discrete, the positions of the elements on the sawtooth are
important. There are two well defined cases:
-
-
The first case is when the number of elements is less than the number of steps.
In this case the phase errors assume a random nature.
case is approximated by a continuous case.
-
•
A method offered to reduce these parasitic lobes is to randomize the periodic
phase
error
. This method significantly reduces the parasitic lobes, while increases the
average power sidelobe level.
Phase Shifters topologies
From the phase
ψ
equation, we can see the relation of phase with other parameters:
where
f
is frequency,
l
is length,
ε
is permittivity (dielectric constant), and
μ
is permeability.
The phase equation above reveals all phase-shifting possibilities at a glance.
The possibilities are:
-
-
phase shifting by changing frequency;
-
-
phase shifting by changing length;
-
-
phase shifting by changing permittivity (dielectric constant);
-
-
phase shifting by changing permeability.
-
•
Phase shifting by
changing frequency
or frequency scanning is accomplished by
series feeding the array antenna elements, having the elements equidistantly
positioned along the line and changing the frequency.
-
•
Changing the frequency, it creates a changing linear phase taper over the array
antenna elements.
-
•
If the physical lengths of the feeding lines are chosen such that, at the center
frequency the phased array antenna beam is directed to broadsight, changing the
frequency to values lower than and greater than the center frequency will get the
beam being directed to, respectively, angles smaller than and angles greater than
broadsight.
-
•
Phase shift can be obtained
changing the permittivity (dielectric constant)
,
ε
, of
the material a signal is propagating through by making use of so-called ferroelectric
materials. Ferroelectric materials are materials for which the permittivity is a function
of the applied electric field over the material.
-
•
Ferrite-based phase shifters have been in use for a long time, especially in
combination with waveguide transmission line technology.
These phase shifters of a rod of ferrimagnetic material, centrally positioned inside a
waveguide, where a solenoid is wound around the waveguide.
By changing the current through the solenoid, the magnetic field is changed and
thereby the
permeability
of the ferrimagnetic rod and thus the phase of a wave going
through the waveguide is changed. The phase can be changed continuously, function
of current, making this phase shifter an analog phase shifter.
-
•
Another way of accomplishing a desired phase shift is by changing
physical lengths
.
This type of phase shifting may be applied to series-fed arrays, as well as to
corporate-fed arrays.
Phase shifters can use switched transmission lines and PIN diodes to change the phase in
discrete phase steps.
Switched-line Phase Shifters
(d)
The standard switched-line Phase Shifter is using switched transmission line segments,
getting different path length and determining in this way the amount of phase shift.
-
•
The simplest switched-line Phase Shifter is dependent only on the lengths of line
used. One of the two transmission lines is labeled as a “reference” line, and the other
as a “delay” line.
-
•
An important advantage of this circuit is that the phase shift will be approximately a
linear function of frequency, getting a wideband frequency range of the circuit.
-
•
The phase shift created is dependent only by the length of the transmission lines,
making the Phase Shifter very stable over time and temperature.
-
•
PIN diodes may suffer for insertion loss tolerance or peak power capability, but both
characteristics don’t affect the phase shift.
-
•
Typically, to avoid the phase errors the isolation of the switches must exceed 20dB in
the required frequency band.
-
•
Insertion loss of the switched-line Phase Shifter is equal to the loss of the SPDT
switches plus the line losses.
-
•
By switching the signal between two pre-determined lengths of transmission lines it is
possible to realize a specific phase shift (Δ
)
at a given frequency.
𝚫
=
𝟐𝛑 (𝐋𝟐
−
𝐋𝟏)
𝛌
where
Δ
is the phase shift, (L2 - L1) is the difference between the physical lengths
of the delay line L2 and the reference line L1, and
𝛌
g
is the
guide wavelength
.
𝛌𝐠
=
𝛌
√𝛆𝐫
𝛌𝐠
=
𝐜
𝑓√𝛆𝐫
𝛌
is the wavelength in vacuum,
ε
r
is the dielectric constant of the substrate,
f
is
the frequency, and
c
is the speed of light.
-
•
To reduce the number of PIN diodes could be used the circuit in the figure above (c),
replacing the reference L1 line with a series PIN diode.
In this circuit, for the 180° phase shift, both PIN diodes are in the OFF position, and the RF
signal passes through line L2 with λ/2 length, providing a 180° phase shift.
The shunt diode is placed at the middle of L2, at λ/4 wavelength
from its ends.
-
-
The phase shift value deviates linearly from the intended value as the frequency of
the signal deviates in either direction from the center (nominal) frequency.
-
-
Switched-line Phase Shifters generally are used for 90° and 180° phase shifts. When
path L2 is a half-
lambda (λ/2) longer than path L1, switching from path L1 to path L2
introduces an increased phase delay of 180°. So, to get a 180° phase shift the
require
d physical length difference should be ΔL = λ/2.
-
-
In a practical design, resonance could appear in the OFF line when the line length is
a multiple of λ/2, and the phases will interfere in a way to reflect much of the incoming
power back to the input port. Thus, both lengths (L1 and L2) must not be multiples of
λ/2. The resonant frequency will be slightly shifted due to the series junction
capacitances of the reversed biased diodes, or of the parasitic capacitances of the
SPDT mechanical switches.
-
-
The lengths L1 and L2 must be carefully selected to avoid phase errors, high return
loss, and high insertion loss.
Three-Bit switched-line phase shifter and Signal Path
The term “phase
shifter” often includes any of
these means for changing the phase:
-
-
Phase shift - The use of phase shifter devices to adjust element phases for beam
scanning is the most popular method. Phase can be changed by altering the
permeability using a ferrite phase shifter or by changing permittivity (dielectric
constant) such as with a ferroelectric phase shifter. Phase shifters are narrow band.
-
-
Time delay - Phase shift in time-delay devices is accomplished by adjusting line
length, usually by switching in various sections of transmission line.
-
-
Hybrid (usually phase-time delay) - Time-delay lines are generally larger than
conventional phase shifters, so in applications where time delay is required, time
delay and phase shift are combined. This will reduce the spreading of a pulse when
the beam is scanned compared to a phase-only feed.
-
-
Frequency scanning - Phase is changed by changing frequency, which changes the
electrical length of the interconnecting lines and is used with series feeds. Frequency
scanned arrays are found in practice, mostly in radars rather than communications
where frequency is usually required to be fixed. An example of a series-fed array is a
waveguide with slots milled in one wall that act as radiating elements.
-
-
Beam switching - Beam scanning could be accomplished by switching between
separate antennas pointed in different directions, but the system would be large and
complex.
-
-
Digital beamforming - Beamforming can be achieved in the digital domain by
sampling the RF signal at the element level and routing to a digital processor unit for
complex weighting (i.e., amplitude and phase control) and summing to form the
beam. Multiple simultaneous beams and adaptive features such as interference
rejection are possible as well.
-
1.
Antennas
–
1
st
and 2
nd
Editions
–
Kraus
-
2.
Antennas - Theory and Practice - Schelkunoff, Friis
-
3.
Advanced Antenna Theory - Schelkunoff
-
4.
Antenna Arrays
–
A Computational Approach - Haupt
-
5.
Microwave Antenna Theory and Design - Silver
-
6.
Phased Array Antennas 2
nd
Edition - Hansen
-
7.
Phased Array Theory and Technology
–
Mailloux
-
8.
Approximate Antenna Modeling for CAD
–
Visser
-
9.
Array and Phased Array Antenna Basics - Visser
-
10.
Modern Antenna Design
–
Milligan
-
11.
Antenna Theory and Design - 3
rd
Edition - Stutzman, Thiele
-
12.
Antenna Arrays and Automotive Applications - Rabinovich, Alexandrov
-
13.
5G Primer for MIMO - Phased-Array Antennas
–
National Instruments
-
14.
5G Phased Array Antenna Design
–
Pandey
-
15.
Linear Antenna Arrays
–
Nikolova
-
16.
Antenna Engineering Handbook, 4
th
Edition - Volakis
-
17.
The Element-Gain Paradox for a Phased-Array Antenna - Hannan
-
18.
Linear Antenna Arrays - Antenna Engineering
-
19.
Antenna Array Testing - Conducted and OTA
–
Rohde & Schwarz
-
20.
Antennas and Propagation - Jacobs University
-
21.
Lecture Notes - Antennas
–
Aksoy
-
22.
Antenna Array Design Choices & Characterization - Rohde & Schwarz
-
23.
mmWave 5G Beamforming and Phased Array Basics
–
Anokiwave
-
24.
Wide-Angle Scanning Phased Array Antenna - Ahn, Hwang
-
25.
Patch Antenna Arrays and Feeding Networks
–
Moshkin
-
26.
Sparse Phased Array Antennas - Theory and Applications
–
Kedar
-
27.
Sparse Linear Antenna Arrays: A Review - Patwari
-
28.
A Series-fed Microstrip Patch Array - EuCAP 2013
-
29.
Characterizing Active Phased Array Antennas - Rohde & Schwarz
-
30.
Demystifying over-the-air (OTA) testing - Rohde & Schwarz
-
31.
Radio and Microwave Wireless Systems
–
Hum
-
32.
Phased Array Antennas
–
Bhattacharyyav
-
33.
Advanced Array Systems, Applications and RF Technologies
–
Fourikis
-
34.
Antenna and Wave Propagation - Raju
-
35.
5G New Radio - An Insight into Physical Layer Antennas and MIMO
–
Anritsu
-
36.
3D Printed Dielectric Lenses Increase Antenna Gain and Widen Beam
Scanning Angle -
3D Fortify
-
37.
Design of Slotted Waveguide Array Antenna and its feed system - Thesis - Can Baris Top
References:
http://www.qsl.net/va3iul