From: Knighten, Jim L (JK100005@exchange.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:11:09 PDT
Addressing the last of your questions, i.e., can active equalization help
from an EMI point of view, it is by opinion that the answer is no.
The work that we have done indicates the following:
* The common-mode component of the differential signal is what causes
radiated EMI from the signal itself (as opposed to other noise that hops a
ride on the differential transmission line). Of course, the
differential-mode component is what the circuit designer intended to exist
on the transmission line. This is probably old news to many readers
* The common-mode is created by imbalance in the differential signal.
The most important type of imbalance is "delay skew," or a timing, or path
length difference between the two sides of the differential signal. We have
published data on this in the IEEE EMC Symposia. Other types of imbalance
also produce a common-mode signal, but not nearly as effectively.
* In my experience, active equalization doesn't contribute to the
delay skew in the line, hence it is not an important part of the EMI
Dr. Jim Knighten e-mail: email@example.com
Technical Consultant - Design
17095 Via del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127 http://www.ncr.com <http://www.ncr.com>
From: Dr. Edward P. Sayre [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 12:16 PM
Subject: [SI-LIST] : 2.5 Gbps across a backplane
A subtle issue came up in the recent T11 (Fibre Channel)
meetings. How do
you spec an interconnect when adaptive equalization parts
will be used to
dig out the signal? If you have really good eye-diagrams
response then do
you need equalization? Conversely, if you need equalization
excessive deterministic jitter (read that insufficient rise
or eye closure (read that too much attenuation) or both,
constitutes an acceptable way to specify the interconnect,
be it backplane,
cable or connector?
Now, the question of cross talk corruption of the signals is
matter, especially when equalization is involved. Cross talk
can be of no
consequence or it can be of terrible consequence, especially
if there is a
requirement for byte (a 4 bit nibble) aligned serial data
work indicates that connector cross talk in differential
to be essentially dV/dt noise due to any asymmetries in the
geometry of the
connector or interconnect (vias count here!). Although
generally in the (1 - 4%) range, it is obviously a problem
when many lines
are switching and especially if the time alignment is not
within a small %
of the rise time between individual differential components.
If the signal
is broken into its even (common mode) and odd (differential)
components, it can be shown that very soon the common mode
dominates the cross talk.
So, when is cross talk an equalization issue from a
diagram point of view; and can equalization help from an EMI
point of view?
I look forward to folks' ideas on this matter.
| NORTH EAST SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| ------------------------------------- |
| "High Performance Engineering & Design" |
| Dr. Ed Sayre e-mail: email@example.com |
| NESA, Inc. http://www.nesa.com/ |
| 636 Great Road Tel +1.978.897-8787 |
| Stow, MA 01775 USA Fax +1.978.897-5359 |
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send
firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put:
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put
si-list archives are accessible at
email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:29:46 PDT