Date: Wed Nov 03 1999 - 08:19:26 PST
A few thoughts, not necessarily connected.
Many times self-test operations generate more power supply transients than
actual operation. Is there decoupling explicitly on the chip or the
package? If you allow the part to start operating on a very low activity
code loop, does it generate a stronger or weaker near field?
Are all of the off-chip drivers tristated during reset or are they toggling
If the crystal is pulled, what is generating the clock to the device?
Something internal to the chip? What frequency does it operate at without
CEC Analysis and I/O Design
Phone: 507.253.0762 Fax: 507.253.4966
Lfresearch@aol.com on 11/03/99 09:31:26 AM
Please respond to email@example.com
Subject: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise
I have a problem with a microprocessor which appears to be radiating very
strongly from the package. I've deactivated all other circuits ( pulled
crystals, pins etc ) on the board. Additionally, the micro is held in
PROM's are pulled, but it's a noisy as heck. Close field probes ( both E
H field ) show the package to be the dominent source of radiation.
The device has a maximum clock rate of 50 MHz, this is where we're using
Clock it at 32 MHz and the emissions fall about 10 dB up to about 300 MHz,
more above 300 MHz. Yes it's a CMOS device.......
Am I stuck with putting a can over the chip? The product has a plastic
package, so there is no shielding available at all.....
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:33 PST