From: Scott McMorrow (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 02 1999 - 05:34:24 PST
I agree with you and would add the following:
Even if a net is low speed, such as a reset might
be by virtue of it's driving edge rate and frequency,
it still might end up being a high speed net by virtue
of being coupled into one. I have seen more system
problems due to crosstalk induced noise in resets
and quasi-static nets with weak pullups.
In my world, everything requires consideration of
being "high speed" unless proven otherwise.
-- Scott McMorrow Principal Engineer SiQual, Signal Quality Engineering 18735 SW Boones Ferry Road Tualatin, OR 97062-3090 (503) 885-1231 http://www.siqual.com
"Ingraham, Andrew" wrote:
> >The starting clock frequency for high speed is F > 200 MHz/L, where L is > the > >longest length of the board, in inches. > > If I were you, I would not be tempted to entertain ANY frequency as the > onset of "high speed", no matter how many caveats you attach to it. > > Consider a system reset signal. Its frequency? Might be 1 cycle/year > (0.00000003 Hz) or lower. Is it in the realm of "high speed"? You bet! If > it rings like crazy and overshoots the dickens out of everything it touches, > it doesn't matter how many times a second you wiggle it. > > Andy > > **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:30 PST