> HP ADS has some very accurate yet very simple models using physical dimensions.
see www.hp.com/go/hpeesof.
Ron Miller
> What about a TSSOP package like memory drivers come in? I've found that a
> lumped RLC model still works pretty well for these kinds of packages (i.e.,
> I get good lab correlation) - and the package effects are certainly not
> negligible. I haven't done very extensive power distribution modeling for
> TSSOPs, but my guess is that an RLC matrix would do the job. So I wouldn't
> go so far as to say that lumped RLC models are a thing of the past.
>
> I would also argue that an inductance matrix is the appropriate model for
> bond wires in just about any package that uses them. But Larry's right -
> once you get onto the substrate in something like a laminate BGA package
> you need transmission line analysis. Sometimes what you really need is
> coupled transmission line analysis where the cross-section varies as you
> move from the bond pad to the via. This is a difficult structure to
> accurately represent in a package model.
>
> Greg Edlund
> Advisory Engineer, Critical Net Analysis
> IBM
> 3650 Hwy. 52 N, Dept. HDC
> Rochester, MN 55901
> gedlund@us.ibm.com
>
> Larry Smith <ldsmith@lisboa.eng.sun.com> on 03/29/99 10:15:11 AM
>
> Please respond to si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
>
> To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> cc: (bcc: Gregory R Edlund/Rochester/IBM)
> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : Package Parasitics Modelling
>
> Daniel - I agree. R-L-C models worked well for packages that had
> no ground or power planes because the parasitics really were similar
> to lumped parameters. But in modern packages with power and ground
> planes, the package parasitics are definitely distributed like
> transmission lines. If the package parasitics are important enough
> to be considered in a design problem, then a lumped (single) R-L-C model
> does not have enough detail to give you the answer you are looking for.
>
> regards,
> Larry Smith
> Sun Microsystems
>
> > From: Daniel.Adar@ecitele.com
> > X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECI TELECOM
> > To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> > Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:26:35 +0300
> > Subject: [SI-LIST] : Package Parasitics Modelling
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > I made some spice simulations of package parasitics effect.
> > I compared the RLC model of IBIS with an ideal Transmission line (with
> > zo=sqrt(L/C) and Td=sqrt(L*C).
> > In both cases I drove the package model (RLC or T line) by a pulse with
> various
> > rise time, Tr.
> > I'd like to share with you the results and conclusions:
> > 1. For very small parasitics (whereTd<<Tr) the RLC gave similar results
> to those
> > of the T line, but there was no need in any model since the effect was
> > negligible.
> > 2. For larger parasitics there is a significant difference between the
> two
> > models.
> >
> > My conclusion is that referring the package parasitics simply as R,L and
> C is
> > incorrect.
> > It should always be modelled as a T line or skipped for small values!
> >
> > Does anyone like to comment on that?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Daniel Adar
> > e-mail: Daniel.Adar@ecitele.com
> >
> >
> >
> > **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
> majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In
> the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list
> archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
> >
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
> majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
-- Ronald B. Miller _\\|//_ Signal Integrity Engineer (408)487-8017 (' 0-0 ') fax(408)487-8017 ==========0000-(_)0000=========== Brocade Communications Systems, 1901 Guadalupe Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131 rmiller@brocade.com, rbmiller@sjm.infi.net
--------------9A201AAEE2ECA290A5B99F6E Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
HP ADS has some very accurate yet very simple models using physical dimensions.see www.hp.com/go/hpeesof.Ron Miller
What about a TSSOP package like memory drivers come in? I've found that a
lumped RLC model still works pretty well for these kinds of packages (i.e.,
I get good lab correlation) - and the package effects are certainly not
negligible. I haven't done very extensive power distribution modeling for
TSSOPs, but my guess is that an RLC matrix would do the job. So I wouldn't
go so far as to say that lumped RLC models are a thing of the past.I would also argue that an inductance matrix is the appropriate model for
bond wires in just about any package that uses them. But Larry's right -
once you get onto the substrate in something like a laminate BGA package
you need transmission line analysis. Sometimes what you really need is
coupled transmission line analysis where the cross-section varies as you
move from the bond pad to the via. This is a difficult structure to
accurately represent in a package model.Greg Edlund
Advisory Engineer, Critical Net Analysis
IBM
3650 Hwy. 52 N, Dept. HDC
Rochester, MN 55901
gedlund@us.ibm.comLarry Smith <ldsmith@lisboa.eng.sun.com> on 03/29/99 10:15:11 AM
Please respond to si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
cc: (bcc: Gregory R Edlund/Rochester/IBM)
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : Package Parasitics ModellingDaniel - I agree. R-L-C models worked well for packages that had
no ground or power planes because the parasitics really were similar
to lumped parameters. But in modern packages with power and ground
planes, the package parasitics are definitely distributed like
transmission lines. If the package parasitics are important enough
to be considered in a design problem, then a lumped (single) R-L-C model
does not have enough detail to give you the answer you are looking for.regards,
Larry Smith
Sun Microsystems> From: Daniel.Adar@ecitele.com
> X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECI TELECOM
> To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:26:35 +0300
> Subject: [SI-LIST] : Package Parasitics Modelling
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> I made some spice simulations of package parasitics effect.
> I compared the RLC model of IBIS with an ideal Transmission line (with
> zo=sqrt(L/C) and Td=sqrt(L*C).
> In both cases I drove the package model (RLC or T line) by a pulse with
various
> rise time, Tr.
> I'd like to share with you the results and conclusions:
> 1. For very small parasitics (whereTd<<Tr) the RLC gave similar results
to those
> of the T line, but there was no need in any model since the effect was
> negligible.
> 2. For larger parasitics there is a significant difference between the
two
> models.
>
> My conclusion is that referring the package parasitics simply as R,L and
C is
> incorrect.
> It should always be modelled as a T line or skipped for small values!
>
> Does anyone like to comment on that?
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Adar
> e-mail: Daniel.Adar@ecitele.com
>
>
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In
the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
si-list
archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
>**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ******** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
-- Ronald B. Miller _\\|//_ Signal Integrity Engineer (408)487-8017 (' 0-0 ') fax(408)487-8017 ==========0000-(_)0000=========== Brocade Communications Systems, 1901 Guadalupe Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131 rmiller@brocade.com, rbmiller@sjm.infi.net--------------9A201AAEE2ECA290A5B99F6E-- **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****