From: Ritchey Lee ([email protected])
Date: Fri Nov 24 2000 - 07:49:56 PST
That is a DC view of an AC problem. When the decoupling is done well enough
to provide the switching currents required to create the fast edges, the two
sides of the split are at the same AC potential, namely that of the underlying
plane. That's because you shorted them to this plane with the capacitors.
Clearly, if the decoupling is not done well, this is not true. Also, if the
decoupling is not done well, there will be excessive noise on both VCC
planes. This will show up in many ways, one of them being potentially high
Chan, Michael wrote:
> What happen if the split is for two different voltage planes?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ritchey Lee [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 11:39 AM
> To: Zabinski, Patrick J.
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : Regarding plane splits
> All of these discussions fail to take into account the fact that the
> ground plane and the two power planes msut be well decoupled in order to
> create a low impedance source for the switching currents that are involved
> in those same swithcing edges. If this had been done well, the power
> planes will, of necessity, be shorted to the ground plane and that will be
> the path around the split.
> In my experience, people who see the effects of a split have failed to do
> a good job of power plane decoupling. Learn how to do this well and
> splits won't bother you.
> Zabinski, Patrick J. wrote:
> > Aloke,
> > As I mentioned in a recent posting, there are conditions in which
> > routing stripline in a configuration you describe sees no effects
> > from the split. More specifically, if your trace layer is "closer"
> > to the solid ground plane than the split power planes, then the
> > solid plane has "more" of an influence on the trace. As such, you
> > will "less" of a discontinuity from the split. I've tested this
> > in the lab under several conditions, and I believe this to be true.
> > However, the reason I used "'s in the above statements is that I
> > haven't taken my experiments far along enough to be able to provide
> > any guidance as to how "close" is "close enough" to reduce the
> > discontinuity effects to the point where your system can tolerate
> > them.
> > In what I call a 50/50 case where the stripline layer is centered
> > vertically in the stackup such that the distance to the solid ground
> > plane is the same as the distance to the split plane, you will notice
> > the discontinuities.
> > Pat
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > > I had a doubt regarding plane splits:
> > >
> > > In the stackup, if there is a power plane on one side of the signal
> > > layer and a ground plane on the other side of the signal
> > > layer(symmetric
> > > stripline config), and if the ground plane is a solid ground plane
> > > having no discontinuities, then can I have splits in the
> > > power plane and
> > > run traces over the splits? Is the ground plane alone not
> > > sufficient to
> > > provide paths for return currents?
> > >
> > > With regards,
> > > Aloke
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> > [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> > si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> > si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > ****
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:30:14 PDT