RE: [SI-LIST] : Far end crosstalk

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Peterson, James F (FL51) ([email protected])
Date: Fri Oct 13 2000 - 07:59:56 PDT

Hello Ohio,
I guess my question would be, why does it have to be a ratio of anything?
Why can't it just be the amount of noise visible at the far end of the
victim's transmission line?
I guess if it is a rating of a t-line's capacity for crosstalk then you
might go with a ratio (for x amount of voltage injected at the aggressor's
t-line you will get x mV of coupled noise at the victim's far end). If this
is the case I would think you would use the aggressor's initial signal

-----Original Message-----
From: JOHN SAWDY [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 12:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SI-LIST] : Far end crosstalk

Greetings from Ohio.
What is the correct definition for far end crosstalk for a transmission line
(cable): is it the ratio of the voltage measured at the far end of a quiet
line vs. the input voltage on the active line or vs. the output (far end)
voltage on the active line, which is an attenuated version of the input

FEXT = Vout quiet/Vin active or Vout quiet/Vout active?

John F. Sawdy, Senior Applications Engineer
Meritec, a division of Associated Enterprises
voice mail: 440-354-3148 x 267
fax: 440 -354-0687
mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:29:45 PDT