**From:** Mike Jenkins (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:08:40 PDT

**Next message:**Vinu Arumugham: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""**Previous message:**Eric Bogatin: "[SI-LIST] : Differential TDR Measurements"**In reply to:**Zabinski, Patrick J.: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""**Next in thread:**Bob Lewandowski: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""

Pat, Some theoretical explanation embedded below. -- Mike

"Zabinski, Patrick J." wrote:

*>
*

*> Fred,
*

*>
*

*> To be honest, I don't know the answer to that. Approach 2
*

*> is actually implemented in commercial equipment, and I
*

*> have yet to get a complete theoretical/implementation explanation
*

*> of how it does it's 'mathematical magic'.
*

View the + and - inputs of the (far-end constantly terminated)

dif'l pair as the ports of a linear 2-port. This can be

completely characterized by any 2-port parameters. Let's

pick Z parameters:

| V1 | | Z11 Z12 | | I1 |

| | = | | * | |

| V2 | | Z21 Z22 | | I2 |

Since it's passive, Z12 = Z21, that is, 'reciprocal'.

If the lines are symmetrical, Z11 = Z22, but that's not

necessary for this derivation. This all works whether

the 2-port is your fancy dif'l traces or some 3-day-old

Big Mac with 2 wires stuck in it. You can determine

2-port parameters by any number of means. One way --

really your 'Approach 2' -- is outlined at the bottom.

The dif'l voltage is Vdif = V1 - V2, and the common mode

voltage is Vcm = (V1 + V2)/2. Similarly, the dif'l

current is Idif = (I1 - I2)/2, and the common mode current

is Icm = (I1 + I2)/2. (Some definitions might differ by

a factor of two.) Substituting these variables results in:

| Vdif | | (Z11+Z22-2*Z12) (Z11-Z22) | | Idif |

| | = | | * | |

| Vcm | | (Z11-Z22)/2 (Z11+Z22+2*Z12)/2 | | Icm |

An 'ideal' case is Icm = 0 (perfect current drive), yielding:

Zdif = Vdif/Idif

= Z11+Z22-2*Z12 (for any traces)

= 2*(Z11-Z12) (for symmetrical traces)

'Ideal' voltage drive, Vcm = 0, yields a correction term

proportional to (Z11-Z22)**2, but I'll leave that to you.

*>
*

*> Under 'linear' conditions (per Dima's posting) *AND* conditions
*

*> where both traces have exactly the same relationship to ground,
*

*> I can envision where Approach 2 would work just fine. However,
*

*> we rarely work under ideal conditions.
*

These equations should let you explore all (linear) non-ideal

situations.

*>
*

*> For example, we sometimes must route differential pairs along
*

*> edges of planes, or we might try to isolate one pair from another
*

*> by routing a ground-strap between them, or we might use broad-side
*

*> coupling microstrip. These conditions (and
*

*> SEVERAL others) place a stronger relationship to ground for one
*

*> signal trace than the other, and I have yet to obtain an explanation
*

*> how the theory/equipment is able to take this into account.
*

*>
*

*> If someone could clue me in, I'd appreciate it. Such an explanation
*

*> alone would solve much of my dilemma.
*

This is probably way too pedantic already, but I'll outline

one other way to look at it: Reflection coefficients are

essentially the time domain equivalent of s-parameters.

Assume you have a single ended TDR plus another 50-ohm

scope input. Connect the TDR to one of the dif'l pair

inputs and the scope channel to the other. Rho11 is the

regular TDR reflection coefficient, and rho12 is the voltage

on the scope channel, time-aligned and normalized to the

actual TDR voltage amplitude. Then swap the TDR and scope

connections to get rho22 and rho21 (= rho12). Same kinda

math as above gets you to (for the symmetrical case),

rho(dif)=rho11-rho12, and the effective dif'l TDR impedance

is 100 ohms, so Zdif = 100 ohms * (1+rho(dif))/(1-rho(dif)).

Hope that helps some. Good luck.

*>
*

*> Pat
*

-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mike Jenkins Phone: 408.433.7901 _____ LSI Logic Corp, ms/G715 Fax: 408.433.7461 LSI|LOGIC| (R) 1525 McCarthy Blvd. mailto:[email protected] | | Milpitas, CA 95035 http://www.lsilogic.com |_____| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****

**Next message:**Vinu Arumugham: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""**Previous message:**Eric Bogatin: "[SI-LIST] : Differential TDR Measurements"**In reply to:**Zabinski, Patrick J.: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""**Next in thread:**Bob Lewandowski: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Differential TDR "Measurements""

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:06 PST
*