From: Sainath Nimmagadda ([email protected])
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 10:00:56 PDT
[email protected] wrote:
> I guess I misunderstood you too. I thought you were making a joke about
> "when somebody *insists* on something" as if we could pass new laws of
> physics **by consensus**! I was going to ask for a re-count. :-)
> But if you were serious, I would hope you meant that while the laws of
> physics may not change, our understanding of them does. Just ask Albert!
Precisely, that is what I meant. I couldn't've come up with better wording.
> He came up with some new laws that broke all the existing rules at the time.
> Not only do you have to "show me the data", you also have to show ME how you
> collected the data and how you explain the data with theory. I've seen too
> many bogus collection methods.
> Aubrey Sparkman
> Signal Integrity
> [email protected]
> (512) 723-3592
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sainath Nimmagadda [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 8:32 PM
> To: Signal Integrity
> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching
> It appears that I was mistaken by some. The message was about the laws of
> physics. No reference to a particular situation. I did not imply that
> physical laws change. All I meant was the possibility of new/additional
> laws (which do not violate existing laws) as we understand science.
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:34 PDT