**From:** Matt Bibee (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Fri Mar 02 2001 - 10:36:28 PST

**Next message:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Previous message:**D. C. Sessions: "Re: [SI-LIST] : so-dimm simulation models......"**In reply to:**Denomme, Paul S.: "[SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Next in thread:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Reply:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"

Your tool should give you the per meter RLGC matrices at your desired

frequency. The classic equation is:

alpha=Re{sqrt[(R + jwL)(G +jwC)]} where alpha is in Nepers/m. I forget the

conversion factor. That's the total loss. Is there an advantage to seperating

loss into conductor and dielectric? If you have it available the hspice W

element can accept RLGC params in matrix format and will model skin and

dielectric loss.

"Denomme, Paul S." wrote:

*> I am currently working on a job and have a microstrip trace on
*

*> GETEK. The trace width is 33 mils 1/2 oz., running at 1GHz, 75 ohms, Dk of
*

*> 3.9, and Loss tangent of .01. I am trying to calculate the total conductive
*

*> loss and the total dielectric losses for this microstrip case. For
*

*> conductive losses I obtained 0.189dB/M which seems correct to me. I
*

*> obtained this result from Ansoft 2D analyzer. I am also trying to determine
*

*> the dielectric losses for this trace but I am not sure if I can use a
*

*> formula for this calculation or not. The formula for dielectric loss I have
*

*> is
*

*>
*

*> Ad=(27.3*SQR(Er)*LossTangent)/Wavelength
*

*>
*

*> The Ansoft software gave me an effective Dk of 2.88 which is .74 of the
*

*> Dk=3.9. I am thinking that I could use the .74*Losstangent as the effective
*

*> loss tangent and
*

*> plug in the effective dielectric constant and the effective loss tangent
*

*> into the above equation to get the dielectric losses. Can anyone tell me if
*

*> I am way off base on this one? or am I right on the money?
*

*>
*

*> I would appreciate any feedback.
*

*>
*

*> Regards,
*

*>
*

*> Paul S. Denomme
*

*> [email protected]
*

*>
*

*> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
*

*> [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
*

*> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> ****
*

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to

[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE

si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.

si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

****

**Next message:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Previous message:**D. C. Sessions: "Re: [SI-LIST] : so-dimm simulation models......"**In reply to:**Denomme, Paul S.: "[SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Next in thread:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"**Reply:**Jian X. Zheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Total Conductive and dielectric Losses for a microstrip trace"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:06 PDT
*