++++++++++++++++++++++ Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:19:55 -0500 From: "ZOOM" To: , "Low Power Amateur Radio Discussion" Subject: [111305] Re: A Quiet ATX Computer Supply? Message-ID: <007b01c16b28$e7204480$3294fea9 at robertpa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had the same problem with my ATX power supply. S9 of noise on all rigs in the shack. I went and purchased another powersupply for $40 and no more proble. Allot of the generic computers skimp on filtering on powersupplies and this is what you get is an RF dog's breakfast. Get a bigger supply that can handle at least 300W and you should be ok. Cheers, Robert VE3RPF ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Low Power Amateur Radio Discussion Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: A Quiet ATX Computer Supply? > Hi. Keith here in the Depths of the Great Bergen Swamp > > I have graduated from the AT to the ATX-form in the shack > computer, and have discovered that the ATX-type supply is > a great RF generator, not a desirable thing in the ham shack! > > Have any of you on the List found an ATX supply/case that > is RF-quiet? I asked around in the local amateur community > and found no one that was happy with the level of RF noise > out of their ATX-based computers. > > I am using the same drives/cards/monitor here and with the > K6-233 on an AT-form motherboard and PS the old comp > was quiet, RF-wise... > > Before one suggests, I already checked Google.com, looked > for reviews of cases on CNET and ZDNet and the like. > > I may have to go back a step to the old comp! > > 72/73, Wm. Keith Hibbert, WB2VUO, TC/ARRL WNY Section > 100% QRP from the Depths of the Great Bergen Swamp > "My night light runs more power than my Rig!" > mailto:wb2vuo at arrl.net ++++++++++++++++++++ Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:01:52 -0800 From: Vic Rosenthal To: Bozidar Benc Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Computer noise problem Bozidar Benc wrote: > My antenna was 20m long wire with 10:1 transformer at the end, which is > connected to my K1 with 20 m of RG58 cable. > > Now the interesting part. > After I added a 10 m long counterpoise to the antenna, the noise from my PC > almost completely vanished! Before you added the counterpoise, the shield on the RG58 was acting as part of the antenna. Since the coax ran close to the PC, it picked up noise. After you added the counterpoise, the coax shield was decoupled from the antenna (the counterpoise was an odd multiple of 1/4 wavelength on 40 meters, so it effectively 'grounds' the coax shield). Good demonstration of a useful principle! Vic K2VCO +++++++++++++++++++++ From: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" To: "Bozidar Benc" , elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Computer noise problem Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:31:10 -0500 The K1 cannot directly hear what is travelling along the OUTSIDE of the coax shield where it attaches to the K1. It can only hear what is coming to it on the inside. The PC is inducing noise voltage on the OUTSIDE of the coax INSIDE the shack. The noise travels away from the K1 and out to the end of the coax, where the outside of the coax is attached to the inside. Then the noise travels back to the K1 on the inside of the shield. The 10 to one transformer would have blocked the shield current from getting to the antenna wire. IF the coax shield was somewhat near a multiple of a half wave, then the coax turns out near the antenna would not have stopped the voltage. The noise voltage would have been impressed against the inside of the shield, with the center conductor at relative zero, hence a noise voltage difference. Hence you hear the PC. If you add the counterpoise, the noise voltage going out has another 1/4 wave of wire to go to a hard end, the coax turns are at a CURRENT point, and become effective. The amount of voltage transferred from the outside of the shield to the inside of the shield is greatly reduced. This kind of noise transmission issue is well known to those trying to get the last few DB of quiet from beverage listening antennas and the like. Common mode current on the outside of a shield out to the antenna, coupling in somehow, and coming back mixed in with the desired signal is a classic beverage killer. 73, Guy. +++++++++++++++++++++