+++++++++++++++++
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:13:33 -0100
From: "Julian (G4ILO)" <g4ilo at qsl.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Remoting K2 Sound
To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net

Tony,

I don't think you should be put off the idea just because some people have 
problems with firewalls. I've just installed a wireless access point so I 
can access my main PC/server using my laptop from anywhere on my "estate". 
My K2 is also connected to that PC, so I'm interested in ways to access it 
remotely within my own network. I'm really looking for a solution that 
involves MixW, since the main attraction is in making PSK31 QSOs while 
reclining in a comfortable chair in the garden. But something that allowed 
me to hear the audio would certainly be handy. I've heard of people using 
NetMeeting for this, but that is a fairly resource-hungry piece of 
software.

73,
--
Julian, G4ILO. (RSGB, ARRL, G-QRP, K2 #392)
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.qsl.net/g4ilo

"Tony Wells" <t.wells at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi David,

I'm not sure what K2S is, but I envisage the remote sound to be a sort of
bolt-on to exsiting remoting software. It just handles the audio - in both
directions in the case of SSB.

Regards,

Tony

+++++++++++++++++
From: "Andreas KU7T" <ku7t at ku7t.org>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 06:17:21 -0700
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: Remoting K2 Sound

Please do not use Port 80 for incoming traffic. Many people are running web
servers behind their firewalls that require this port forwarded to the
server. Why not use some high number port like 8080+. Those are usually
open, as far as I know.

Regards,

Andreas, KU7T

+++++++++++++++++
From: "David Gropper" <dmg at bossig.com>
To: "Andreas KU7T" <ku7t at ku7t.org>, <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: Remoting K2 Sound
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:35:20 -0700

Andreas,

Port 8080 is also quite frequently used for web
servers.........

+++++++++++++++++
From: "Dale Wiese" <dwiese at ameritech.net>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Re: Remoting K2 Sound
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:38:08 -0500



> 
> Andreas,
> 
> Port 8080 is also quite frequently used for web servers.........
> 

Here is the official assignment for 8080:
http-alt        8080/tcp    HTTP Alternate (see port 80)
http-alt        8080/udp    HTTP Alternate (see port 80)
#                           Stephen Casner <casner at precpt.com>

The complete list is here:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

Dale N9XD

++++++++++++++++++
From: "Tony Wells" <t.wells at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: "Julian (G4ILO)" <g4ilo at qsl.net>,
        "Elecraft List" <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Remoting K2 audio (another approach)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:17:27 +0100

Julian wrote:
> At http://lakesoft.com/ I found software components for writing streaming
> audio applications. Better still, there is a set of precompiled demo
> applications (http://lakeofsoft.com/vc/download.html) any one of three of

Hi Julian,

I kind of went down your logic route as well, and used a delphi demo
component set to make a sender and receiver. I found it seemed to work
well - I used VNC as well with K2S. I think VNC is brilliant myself,
especially as it is free, and works on Linux and Unix plaforms as well.

Regards,

Tony
M3CJF
G7IGG

+++++++++++++++++++
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:47:27 +0000
To: "Elecraft List" <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
From: Brendan Minish <ei6iz at newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Remoting K2 audio (another approach)

At 19:17 15/04/2003 +0100, Tony Wells wrote:

>  - I used VNC as well with K2S. I think VNC is brilliant myself,
>especially as it is free, and works on Linux and Unix plaforms as well.

Tight VNC
http://www.tightvnc.com/
retains VNC compatibility but overcomes most of the lag problems and screen 
update problems that original VNC has if used at both ends.
it's also free, open source & cross platform and comes with a Java client

73
Brendan

++++++++++++++++++++