Ionoscatter on 50 and 144 MHz

Palle Preben-Hansen, OZ1RH


If you are you an experienced DX'er you know that you can use troposcatter to work stations 5-800 km away on VHF/UHF/SHF regardless of band conditions. Scatter can also take place in the ionosphere. Ionoscatter is most often caused by scattering from irregularities in the ionosphere at 65-85 km of height giving QSO's at app. 1.000-2.000 km. In this lecture ionoscatter is examined closer in order to evaluate its possibilities for QSOs on 50 and 144 MHz.



Preface *

Definition of ionoscatter *

Commercial use of ionoscatter *

Traditional ionoscatter - DX on 50 MHz anytime! *

Path loss, expected minimum and maximum range of your station *

Reliability and power saving *

Noise level *

Radiation angle, height of the scattering media *

Polarization *

Diurnal variations of signal strength *

Fading *

Optimum frequency *

Ionospheric disturbances *

Ionoscatter on 144 MHz *

Possible sources of enhanced ionoscatter seen by radioamateurs on 144 MHz *

Polar Mesosphere Summer Echoes, PMSE *

Radiation angle, ground reflection and ground gain *

Flat Ground *

Sloping ground *

Calculation of the radiation angle *

Signal quality *

Sources with info on the current status of the ionosphere *

Conclusion *

Literature *


Target group:

Experienced DXers on 50 or 144 MHz who would like to know how ionoscatter can be used to provide QSOs at 1.000-2.300 km.


After the lesson the participants should:

- know about ionoscatter propagation

- have a general idea on what equipment is needed on 50 and 144 MHz

- know what could be done to get a better understanding of ionoscatter on 144 MHz


This lecture will be held in English, but questions may also be asked in German and French (QRS s.v.p.).



Lecture by OZ1RH, operator at OZ5W/OZ9EDR contest team.




My call is not heard often on the bands. I was licensed in 1963 and qualified half a year before being 18 for my extra class license. I worked mostly HF and hold DXCC. I have done some 144 MHz contesting since the late sixties and in the beginning of the nineties I started being active on VHF from OZ9EDR/OZ5W. I read some 40-50 years old texts, and found that the military had discovered a propagation called ionospheric forward scatter which was used for links between 1.000 and 2.300 km with high reliability 24-H a day. I figured out, that if this propagation could be used to make QSOs on an otherwise dead band my contest score could be improved considerably. Now I want to share this knowledge with you.

I have no education in electronics, but hold bachelor degrees from the Copenhagen Business School of Commerce in public administration and organization, strategy and planning. I am employed in the computer business, so this text is based only on my leisure time study of the referenced literature and on my experience from the bands. I know my words are not the whole truth, but I hope they come closer to "nothing but the truth".

Much of the literature I have read on scatter dates back to 1954-60, where it was a hot item among scientists and radio engineers. I trust we may still use this old information, as the characteristics of the propagation itself have not changed in the past 45 years.

Ionoscatter was used by the military 1950-60, so information on ionoscatter was to some extend restricted in those days due to security reasons. Some of the sources I have read mention "Printed with permission of the Admiralty" or "Some essential parts are deleted due to US government policies". Thus ionoscatter so far has been quite unknown to many amateurs. Today the military has other possibilities and the traditional ionoscatter is well described even in public NATO papers (e.g. AGARD conference proceedings).

To make my lectures more lively I do them without a fully written text and I base my speech only on my prepared PowerPoint slides with overheads as backup in case of PC panic. If you ask some interesting questions I will be happy to answer, and this will make the lecture even more interesting for you. My lecture may thus include other ideas than presented here, and you can't be sure it will include all of the following. So my best advise to you is to read the text and come to the lecture with some good questions.


Definition of ionoscatter

Ionoscatter is scattering of radio waves in the ionosphere due to irregularities in the electron distribution, which causes changes in the refractive index. Scattering is most pronounced in the D-region between 70 and 90 km and is best from 30-60 MHz.

Ionoscatter is a propagation mechanism available 24H a day like meteor scatter, but it is different from meteor scatter. Ionoscatter deliverer's a continuos weak signal and does not have the characteristic bursts in signal strength of meteor scatter.

Ionoscatter is scatter like troposcatter, but troposcatter is limited to 7-900 km and has no skip zone. Ionoscatter starts about 900 km and extends to almost 2.000 km. Troposcatter works on all frequencies 50 MHz to 10 GHz, whereas ionoscatter is only on 50 MHz with occasional enhancements making it work on 144 MHz also.


Commercial use of ionoscatter

Ionoscatter was investigated and put to use shortly after WWII. Ionoscatter was used by the military from about 1954-62 for a link Goose Bay -> Sonderstromfjord in Greenland ->Iceland -> England with a leg to Thule airbase. This ionoscatter link was around 1960-62 replaced by a troposcatter link Cape Dyer(?) to Sonderstromfjord and over Greenland = DYE chain. Also the troposcatter link is not used any more. The ionoscatter link used Collins IS-101: 40 kW and 20 dB antenna gain (corner reflector with 3-6 dipoles in parallel) on 49 MHz and had a reliability of 99,9 percent on initial 16 teletype channel link or one voice channel.

Ionoscatter test ranges and military use:



Distance km

Power + antenna

Frequency MHz


Cedar Rapids, Iowa-Sterling, Virginia, USA


20-40 kW 500 ft rhombic 17-18 dBd

2 kHz bandwidth



Anchorage-Barrow, Alaska


500 ft rhombic 18 dBd



Fargo, North Dakota-Churchill, Manitoba


500 ft rhombic 18 dBd



Long Branch, Ill-Boulder, Colorado


500 ft rhombic 20 dBd


app. 1954

Lerwich, Shetlands-Channel Islands


40 kW



Thule, Greenland-Sondrestromfjord, Greenland


Collins IS-101

40 kW 20 dB corner reflector



Goose Bay, Labrador-Sondrestromfjord, Greenland


Collins IS-101 ?



Loring Air Force base, Maine or Wachusett, Mass. to Goose Bay, Labrador


Collins IS-101 ?



Sondrestromfjord, Greenland-Iceland


Collins IS-101 ?



Iceland-England (London area?)


Collins IS-101 ?





50 kW



Iceland-Banbury (London)





Tromsö, Norway -Kjeller, Norway


5 kW, small rhombic TX, 4x6 elm RX



Naples, Italy-Izmir, Turkey


60 kW corner reflector with 6 full wave elements 23 dB 16 TTY or 1 voice channel 94-97% reliability


Aug 61-June 62

The Hague, Holland-Toulon, South France (SHAPE Technical Center)


5 kW

2x5 elm yagi 13dB 240 Hz bandwidth

4 TTY channels ARQ

99,9% reliability



Pacific Scatter System

Several hops from Hawaii to the Philippines

? Two voice channels. Build by Page Communications

? used

troposcatter and ionoscatter


St. John's-Cape Spear, Newfoundland-the Azores





It is seen that a lot of research was done in beginning of the 50ties. It was found that Ionospheric Forward Scatter provided good reliability in the arctic, where HF is unreliable due to aurora and PCA. Thus ionoscatter circuits was established for communication with Thule Airbase, Greenland and other remote places. During the sunspot maximum in 1957 it became clear that propagation in the used frequency range 35-60 MHz was often disturbed by sporadic E and F2 propagation. This created multi path problems, which the modems of those days could not handle. As a consequence the ionoscatter circuits was moved to troposcatter and the engineers and researchers lost interest in ionoscatter. About 1990 researchers started to use incoherent backscatter radar (MST radar) to investigate in plasma properties of the ionosphere. They are not interested in radio communication but in the ionosphere it self. However their data and knowledge gives us easy access to information on the ionosphere.

The following sketch of a corner reflector antenna for ionoscatter taken from: Kirby, R.C.,VHF Propagation by Ionospheric Scatter, Transactions of the IRE, Vol CS-4, No. 1, p. 17. The next picture shows (the rest?) of such a monster. Four dipoles are barely visible, but the reflector wires are not seen. Perhaps they have been blown off


The ionoscatter stations of the 50ties used typically 40 kW and 20 dB antenna gain on frequencies of 35-50 MHz. This is much more that amateurs can use, so most amateurs have given up the hope of using ionoscatter. As we will see later all hope is not out. The military use had a reliability of 99.9%. If we amateurs settle for "only" 50 % we can make a QSO with about 28 dB less. Say 16 dB less power and 12 dB less antenna gain. That is 1 kW SSB bandwidth and 8 dB antenna gain, quite common today on 50 MHz. QST March 1956 writes about 600 W CW and 12 dB antenna gain. If we go for narrow bandwidth CW with EME technology (filters and procedure) it should be quite possible. The info I have got from US stations is that 1500 w and a big beam on 50 MHz will provide continuos 51-53 signals at 1.200-1.500 km every morning. Ionoscatter conditions changes and enhancements of 20 dB can happen. Then even SSB or 144 MHz will produce many DX QSOs.


Traditional ionoscatter - DX on 50 MHz anytime!

Ionoscatter is spreading of radio waves in the ionosphere caused by irregularities in the ionization = the electron content. The scattering takes place in a layer about 85 km of height.

This scattering takes place anytime meaning that ionoscatter is available even on a dead band if enough power and antenna gain is used.


Path loss, expected minimum and maximum range of your station

Ionoscatter works from 1.200 (not much less) to a little over 2.000. At paths shorter than 1.200 km path loss increases, as scatter angle gets bigger (just like Es: short skip is more difficult). Path loss increases little towards 2.000 km due to earth curvature, but after that the two stations can no longer see a common part of ionosphere at 85 km, so path loss increases fast. With a super QTH limit may be stretched to some 2.300 km, but this is something like a slooping hill 300 ASL overlooking the ocean (The Azores!). No double hop is possible, as the path loss is far too high.

It is seen that the level of an ionoscatter signal increases up to about 1.300 km. The reason for this is that the scattering angle is greater for shorter distances, as the signal has to go up steep to 85 km and there scatter a large angle to go steep down again. Interesting to have propagation where signal strength increases with distance!

You are probably aware that you can use troposcatter for making QSOs anytime and your range is likely to be 6-800 km if you have a reasonable DX station. The following diagram shows how many dB the troposcatter path loss is below the free space path loss at various distances from 100 - 2.000 km. For the longer distances ionosphere scatter is included and this shows us some interesting possibilities on 50 MHz.


Reliability and power saving

Ionoscatter exhibits fast fading following the Rayleigh distribution. The military use of ionoscatter wanted 99.9% reliability. Though we amateurs might want high reliability we can settle for much less. EME QSOs may be reliable but the signal strength is not very high and copy can be somewhat unreliable. Never the less we make QSOs. The same goes for ionoscatter. If we settle for 50 % reliability we can no doubt make a QSO anytime if we accept the QSO may take half an hour. If reliability is reduced from 99.9 to 50 % a power saving of 28 dB can be had as seen on this curve:

The curve even shows that meteor scatter adds another 20 dB by going from 50 % to 1 % reliability.


Noise level

Cosmic noise on 50 MHz playss quite a role if you want to hear weak signals. Cosmic noise varies 6 dB, so it is a good idea to point your antenna to a quiet part of the sky. However ionoscatter comes along the great circle bearing, so you want low cosmic noise in direction of your sked partner. The reverse is true for him. Since you beam at different part of the sky you could think you experience a kind of one way skip in case one of you beams a noisy part of the sky while the other beams a quiet part. You might be well off using an EME program for calculation of sky temperature. Also you should have an antenna with high gain (sharp beam) and with small side loops. They only pick up noise. Remember to optimize your antenna for minimum sideloops in the vertical plane (E-plane), then it will also have small sideloops in the horizontal plane. It is mostly in the vertical plane you could pick up cosmic noise. Stacking antennas vertically at 0.6 wavelengths will suppress noise from above. Remember the engineers' back in the 50ties used corner reflectors, which are fabulous for few side/backloops.


Radiation angle, height of the scattering media

The continuos ionoscatter signal seems to come from a thin layer at 85 km. It is general practice to align the antennas so they have a common volume at 85 km. During daytime scattering takes place lower perhaps down to 70 or even 65 km. meteor scatter and Es takes place around 105-110 km. Scattering in the F-layer may come from 300 km of height. The needed radiation angles for a common volume at mid path is shown in this diagram:

Note that this curve is calculated for scattering at mid path. You may make QSO if your and your partners radiation intersects in the layer doing the scatter. There is no requirement that the scatter volume has to be at mid path, but it is practice to align the antenna height for mid path scattering. This tells us that you should have no dip in your radiation pattern below about 10-9 degrees. For flat ground this means an antenna only about 1.5-2 wavelengths up. I suggest that you calculate your radiation angle from the slope of your local ground and pick a compromise depending of the range you want to span. Other propagation forms require other radiation angles, troposcatter and probably F2 needs very low radiation angle (<1 deg) but meteor scatter higher angles.



Ionoscatter generally preserves polarization, and path loss is reported smaller for horizontal polarization. This may be due to 2-3 dB more ground gain at each end for horizontal polarization. So do not try a vertical, or a vertical beam, but who would that anyway. You need all the antenna gain including ground gain you can get.

Only in few instances are the ionoscatter signal random polarized.


Diurnal variations of signal strength

Ionoscatter seems to have diurnal variation of about 10 dB in signal strength with best signal strength at noon at path midpoint. During daytime the height of the scattering media is lower, perhaps 65-75 km, so range may be lower and higher radiation angles may be required.



Slow fading can be ascribed to overall changes in refractive conditions in the atmosphere. Rapid fading is caused by movements of small-scale irregularities, which are responsible for the scatter process.

The commercial world often fights fading with diversity reception, two or more receivers and selection of the best signal. Two antennas spaced 50-100 l will do the trick, but this seems to be an overkill for most amateurs. It is much easier to wait a few seconds or retransmissions in order to copy the signal. This argument does not hold for data transmission as long as the modulation scheme is not optimized for the kind of fading encountered on the path.


Optimum frequency

Ionoscatter path loss increases with about 5 dB pr. 10 MHz from 30 to 60 MHz as seen on this curve:

Cosmic noise decreases with frequency so a higher frequency has advantages. The optimum is around 50 MHz. Guess why 50 MHz was a military band for decades!


Ionospheric disturbances

Signals are stronger during HF-blackouts/auroras. HF-blackouts are caused by increased absorption in the D-layer. This will protect us from cosmic noise and a strong D-layer scatters better, so we may continue our ionoscatter QSOs. Aurora is more of a problem, as it results in fast QSB called sputter, which is several hundred Hz overlaying the signal. However amateurs will hardly call aurora a problem, we just turn our beams somewhere to the north and make even more QSOs.


Ionoscatter on 144 MHz

Ionoscatter weakens with the 5 power of the frequency (f**5) above 50 MHz, so do not count on ionoscatter for 144 MHz.

There are some QSO's between big EME'er in Europe reported as ionoscatter, so it is not impossible on 144 MHz. They do it around noon in the summer months with about 5-8 degrees boom elevation for a 1.200 to 1.400 km QSO. The QSO's are only possible during good 'iono' conditions, which seems to be in the summertime like Es. This ionoscatter does not fit with the old characteristics of ionoscatter: a weak but fairly constant signal. It seems there exists other form of ionoscatter than the traditional continuous one 30-70 MHz from about 85 km of height.



Possible sources of enhanced ionoscatter seen by radioamateurs on 144 MHz

  1. Es on lower frequencies could mean more scattering (due to ionospheric turbulence = changes in ionization) on higher frequencies. The Es cloud should be at about mid of the 144 MHz path.
  2. Polar Mesosphere Summer Echoes, PMSE is a kind of summertime polar Es at 80-85 km. PSME gives increased radar echoes on certain days most often in June and July and more sporadic in May and August. PMSE is caused by highly structured plasma density fluctuations concentrated in thin layers at 85 km It is not clear to me how far south PSME may occur, but they have been detected by radar in Germany. Quite a few of the European 144 iono QSO's have been done from mid to the northern part of Sweden (SM5-SM2).
  3. F-layer scatter at 250-300 km. Several US ionoscatter QSO's are reported at 2.500-2.800 km. They are possible between eme stations any day. This distance is too far to be caused by scattering from 85 km, so F-layer scattering seems likely. F-layer scattering is associated with Spread-F and may be from field aligned ionization at 250-300 km of height. See spread F. A condition of the F region of the ionosphere caused by patches of ionization that scatter or duct radio signals, characterized on ionograms by a wide range of heights of reflected pulses. In equatorial latitudes spread F is most commonly observed at night and may be negatively correlated with geomagnetic activity; at high latitudes spread F occurs throughout the daytime and is positively correlated with magnetic activity. The latitude of minimum occurrence of spread F is near 30 degrees magnetic latitude.
  4. Scattering in the ionosphere where scintillation is enhanced due to enhanced ionization, see
  5. SID, PCA, Aurora?

The following diagram shows several forms of scatter. Its text "field aligned scatter" should be interpreted as F-layer scatter. The propagation called FAI among radioamateurs is as far as I know scatter from field aligned irregularities that are rests of Es clouds at 105-110 km.



Polar Mesosphere Summer Echoes, PMSE

PMSE seen on radar:

This figure shows the percentage of hours each day when the ESRAD radar detected PMSE in 1998 from day 140 to 240. PMSE is clearly a summer occurrence:






















­ May 20th ­ August 10


PMSE - diurnal variation:




















PMSE is seldom present between 21-01 local time and more common at higher altitudes during the after noon



Radiation angle, ground reflection and ground gain

The radiation angle is the angles where the transmitted signal and the signal from the ground image of the antenna are in phase. DX-ers on HF known, that the radiation angle of a horizontal beam is a function of its height over ground. At the radiation angle the signal may be enhanced by 5-6 dB of ground gain. The engineers in the 50ties took advantage of this ground gain by placing the antennas at the height giving the needed radiation angle. If you want this 5-6 dB you better know what you are doing. If you put your antenna up too high you might loose 10-15 dB at certain angles and it is likely you will make few QSOs requiring this radiation angle.

The radiation angle is always higher than the elevation angle of the boom as long as there are ground effects.


Flat Ground

The following radiation angles can be calculated for a QTH on a flat ground:

Beam height over flat ground in meters

50 MHz

144 MHz

10 m



20 m



30 m



40 m




Sloping ground

If the terrain is not flat quite a lot may happen to the radiation angle. If you have a hill in front of you, so the terrain is sloping upward the radiation angle will increase, clearly not good. However a downward slope will give lower angle of radiation. The required height of your tower is much smaller, when your QTH is on top of a hill, which is sloping gently right to the ocean or horizon in all direction. This is one of the main reasons for going /P to a hilltop.


Calculation of the radiation angle

The radiation angle from a QTH calculated by software. I know of the following packages doing this:

  1. YTAD from ARRL FTP or BBS. Look for QEX-files
  2. YT bundled with ARRL Antenna Handbook 1997
  3. Terrain Analysis 1.0 by K6STI, app. 80 USD

The angle of radiation for horizontal polarization is only dependent of the antenna height over reflecting ground. Using a vertical stack of two horizontal beams will concentrate the energy at the lowest radiation angle determined by the average antenna height, so stacking does not "pull down" the radiation angle. The radiation angle of the stack is the same as from one antenna mounted at the average antenna height, but the stack will put more power (say +2.5 dB) out at this angle. Vertical stacking of two beams will mean the average antenna height will be in the middle of the two beams, that is half the stacking distance lower than the upper beam. This means higher radiation angle than using the upper beam alone. Stacking requires a higher tower in order to get the same angle of radiation. If your situation is a fixed tower height consider, that stacking will mean more power in the lowest loop, which will be at a higher radiation angle than using just one antenna at the top.

If you want to know more on ground reflections, radiation angle and ground gain see my article in Scriptum der Vorträge 1998 p. 21.1-21.11 or at


Signal quality

Scatter is composed of simultaneous reflections from many small objects. If all the resulting small signals arrive in phase at the RX the scatter is coherent and the signal quality is Q5. If all the small signals arrive more or less out of phase at the RX the scatter process is incoherent and the signal sounds distorted, much like aurora. Ionospheric forward scatter along a great circle bearing is almost coherent, so signal quality is OK as long as we use SSB or CW. If you want to make a data channel using ionoscatter you should however consider reading the books on ionoscatter and distortion, bandwidth and diversity reception. Selective fading could get you into troubles.

You have no doubt hears that long distance troposcatter signals has a slight hollow "tropo sound" somewhat similar to a slightly aurora distorted signal. It is caused by incoherent scattering as the scatter angle is increasing. Likewise the shorter ionoscatter 900-1000 km signals I have heard on 50 MHz has this DX-sound as the scatter angle is relatively high.


Sources with info on the current status of the ionosphere

The most important source of information on the ionosphere are MST radars, see a worldwide overview of MST radars at There is one in Wales which transmits on 46,5 MHz with 160 kW peak to a 104x104 m antenna with a beam width of 3,3 degrees. Such a radar can measure lots of things in the Mesosphere, Stratosphere and Troposphere (thus the name MST) and most important some of the results are available on the internet, check and The radar pictures shows that the scatter situation is often more complicated than the simple drawing I have presented above. Some of the radars provide an online picture of the ionization 80-90 km above the radar site. Here you can even see Es clouds and other forms of ionization, which could be useful for a QSO. Check as an example on this.

This map shows all of the world's operational incoherent scatter radars. If you use the picture on you can access their WWW servers by clicking on the red dots or the site names.





  1. Ionoscatter is a weak constant signal, stronger than eme, but weaker than anything else, IS is there 24H 365 days a year
  2. Ionoscatter is scatter in the lower ionosphere, D-layer at 65-90 km
  3. Frequency dependence:
    - higher frequency = less scatter f**5!
    - higher frequency = less cosmic noise
    => optimum 40-60 MHz, e.g. 50 MHz amateur band
    - 144 MHz requires about 30 dB more than eme!
    - at 430 MHz even Areceibo (60 dB gain and 2 MW) can only detect the stronger day time scatter signal
  4. Diurnal variations
    - constant background signal from 85 km
    - strongest at noon mid path from 65-70 km (?)
    - phase measurement on VLF (17.8 kHz) shows D-layer height of 70 km at day time and 90 km at night
    - 11 years period? Research done 1950-56, just before sun spot maximum
    - sun eruption => stronger D-layer, more scatter and less cosmic noise due to increased absorption, then the higher frequencies (70 MHz) are better
  5. Distance
    < 1.000 km too steep scatter angle
    > 1.800-2.000 km no common volume
    => optimum around 1.200 km
  6. How to differentiate between IS, TS, MS, Es...
    - TS has zero radiation angle
    - MS only short lived, few sec to minutes but up to 40 dB increase in signal strength
    - Es often strong signal strength +40dB or more
    - other enhancements:
    - FAI is well known: only in the south, weak fluttery signal often after Es
    - PMSE, a kind of weak Es in the north
  7. Amateur possibilities compared to the military 20 dB antennas and 40 kW system:
    - 1 kW - 16 dB
    - 12 dBd antenna - 8 dB
    - 50% reliability accepted + 28 dB => QSOs are possible!
  8. Enhancements of ionoscatter which may give increased scattering and perhaps make 144 MHz ionoscatter QSOs possible:
    - Es clouds which may have too low reflection frequency for the band used for ionoscatter
    - reminisce of meteor trails
    - other kinds of ionizations, like PSME
    - scattering in the F-layer
    - this would all be scattering in the ionosphere but is not the kind of ionoscatter available any time. If it gives you QSOs work first and worry about the causes of the ionization later.



Here are some articles on ionoscatter I have studied with interest:

Kirby, R.C.,VHF Propagation by Ionospheric Scatter, and many other articles in Transactions of the IRE, Vol CS-4, No. 1, p. 17

The scatter propagation Issue: Proc. of the IRE, October 1955, p.1175-1298 ff.

Bowles, K.L., Ionospheric Forward Scatter, Annals of International Geo. Year, 3,4,1957, p. 346-360

E. Fich and R. Ruddlesden, "The choice of aerial height for ionospheric scatter links", Proc. IEE, vol. 105, pt. B, suppl. 8, January 1958, p. 12-18 <- the whole volume is 200 pages of interesting stuff on tropo- and ionoscatter

"Report of JTAC on Radio transmission by ionospheric and tropospheric scatter", Proc. IRE, January 1960

R.G. Merrill, "Optimum Antenna Height for Ionospheric Scatter Communication", IRE Transactions on Communications Systems, March 1960, p. 14-19

R.G. Merrill, "Radiation Pattern in the Lower Ionosphere And Fresnel Zones for Elevated Antennas Over a Spherical Earth", National Bureau of Standards Monograph 38, 1962

Bowles, K. L., G. R. Ochs, and J. L. Green, On the absolute intensity of incoherent scatter echoes from the ionosphere J. Res. NBS, Radio Propagation, 66D, 395-407, 1962.

Hagfors, Tor, On the Forward Scattering of Radio Waves in the Lower Ionosphere, J. Res. NBS, Radio Propagation, 66D, 409-418, 1962.

Folkestad, K. (ed.), Ionospheric Radio Communications, Plenum Press, New York, 1968

Grosskopf, Jürgen (1970), Wellenausbreitung I

CCIR XIIIth Plenary Assembly, Geneva 1974, Volume VI, Ionospheric Propagation, ISBN 92-61-00071-1, Rep. 259-3 VHF propagation by regular layers, sporadic E or other anomalous ionization and Rep. 260-2 Ionospheric-Scatter Propagation

Ince, A.N., Vogt, Williams, H.P., A review of Scatter Communications, AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 244, ISBN 92-835-0219-1, London 1978, 21-1

Davies, K., Ionospheric Radio, London, 1990, ISBN 0 86341 186 X, p. 470-476

Rohan, P. Introduction to Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Artec House, Nordwood, MA, 1991, ISBN 0-89006-545-4, p. 194-195

Amateur literature:

Moynahan, Mark A., W2ALJ (now K3EE), VHF Scatter Propagation and Amateur Radio, QST, March 1956 (reprinted in Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the Central States VHF Society, IBSN 0-87259-805-5, ARRL order # 8055)

The World above 50 Mc, QST May 1967, p. 74-76

Hubach, Jan, OH1ZAA, D-layer Ionoscatter on 50 MHz, Six News, issue 30, June 1991

The World above 50 Mc, QST Feb 2000, p. 84

Liebmann, J.G., K5JL, Ionospheric Scatter, Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the Central States VHF Society, IBSN 0-87259-805-5, 2000 ARRL order # 8055, p. 34-35


A little advertising is coming your way also. My practical experience with ionoscatter comes from contesting where propagation can be judged. OZ5W/OZ9EDR contest team tries to make DX QSOs regardless of band conditions, but we need someone at the other end to make a QSO. Please try looking for OZ9EDR or OZ5W in major contests and 19-23H local time: Tuesday of the month: 144.280 SSB/CW GU78b/8877/2x8874 2x18elm M2+2x9elm

2.nd Tuesday of the month: 432.180 SSB/CW 3CX800A 4x28elm

3.rd Tuesday of the month: 1296.180 SSB/CW OZ1BGZ 140 W at 4x37 elm JO65AP Tuesday of the month: 50.160 SSB/CW 2x8874 1kW 9elm /P JO55KR

We mostly have one beam to the south (DL and PA0) shortly after 19H local and to the northeast (SM and OH) around 21H local. Please exchange full 6-digit locator. We are in JO55UL or /P likely at JO64GX or JO55KR.

E-mail: oz1rh -at-

Phone: +45 46 78 77 67

GSM: +45 40 36 77 67

Fax: +45 46 76 10 67

Sri no packet, life is too short for QRP and 1200 bps!


Palle Preben-Hansen

Soderupvej 104

Aagerup Mill

DK-4000 Denmark