EFHW
is probably the WORST name for this antenna, because you need to
AVOID half wavelength lengths for the bands you wish to use!
Most of
the writing on the Internet isn't about EFHW "End Fed Half
Wave" antennas, but about EFW "End Fed Wires".
If you really want
to find an article about End Fed Half
Wave antennas, this is the best place to find
information:
A half
wave wire fed at the center is low impedance and has high
current at the center, at the ends where the current goes to
zero (very low current) , it becomes "voltage fed" or high
impedance.
The
radiation of any antenna is maximum at the current peak which
occurs at 1/4 wave points - which is the center of a 1/2 wave
dipole.
See the
gif showing the standing waves on a half wave dipole, the RED is
voltage - maximum occurs at the ends where current goes to ZERO
because there is NO more conductor to travel, so current flow
goes to ZERO. When current is zero, voltage by necessity
is maximum.
Blue is
the current, where there is maximum current that is where
maximum radiation occurs. The center of the center fed
dipole is at a high current point and a low voltage point. A
high current point / low voltage point is low impedance. A
high voltage, low current point (the opposite) is a high
impedance. So the ends of the 1/2 wave wire are high impedance
which is an End Fed Half Wave. The practical measurement
of a half-wave end fed wire at a half wave is around 3,000 ohms
at the center it will be about 70 ohms.
Half wave
antennas will have larger bandwidth because the impedance
doesn't change as rapidly as the low impedance at the center
does.
Although
resonance is important, for practical radio working, it's much
more important for power to be accepted by the antenna, which
means that the characteristic impedance of the feedline (or
feeder) matches the impedance of the antenna feed point.
A
half-wave antenna end fed (impedance = 3,000 ohms) by 50 ohm
coax will have a VSWR of approximately 60:1.
A
half-wave antenna center fed (impedance = 70 ohms) by 50 ohm
coax will have a VSWR of approximately 1.4:1.
A
half-wave antenna end fed (impedance = 3,000 ohms) by 50 ohm
coax using a 49:1 transformer to elevate its impedance 2,450
ohms will have a VSWR of approximately 1.2:1.
Antenna
books will have more information on transmission lines - high
tension lines are high voltage and are best for long runs - high
voltage = high impedance - which is why open wire feeders are
lowest loss.
Shane
Nelson, KD8UJM under the ebay seller name "NelsonAntennas"
sells excellent quality transformers like this one
https://www.ebay.com/itm/191782023426
for antennas (also available in all stainless models for slightly
more cost) has an extremely well researched and tried
document about EFW antennas.
http://www.hamuniverse.com/randomwireantennalengths.html
Stay away from antenna lengths of multiples of
1/2 wave - fundamentals
and harmonics are listed on https://qsl.net/n1ea/efw
These are the ANTENNA wire lengths
to stay away from:
16 19 22 26 32 33 38 44
46 48 52 64 65 66 76 78 80 88 92 95 96 99 104 110 112 114 123
128 130 132 133 138 144 152 154 156 160 165 171 176 182 184
190 192 195 198 208 209 220 224 228 230 231 234 240 242 246
247 256 260 264 266 272 276 285 286 288 297 304 308 312 320
322 323 325 330 336 338 342 352 361 363 364 366 368 369 374
380 384 390 396 399 400 414 416 418 429 432 437 440 442 448
455 456 460 462 464 468 475 480 484 494 495 496.
Shane Nelson recommends
the VE3EED (phone sub bands) calculated lengths which are:
29
35.5 41 58 71 84 107
119 148 203 347 407 423
EFHW is probably
the WORST name for this antenna, because you need to AVOID half
wavelength lengths for the bands you wish to use!
The
antenna is really a End Fed Wire - EFW.
AVOID half-wave and harmonics of
half-wave!
These are Mike, AB3AP's
calculated lengths for the CW bands.
In the
following chart the WHITE areas are the desired lengths!
You cannot find one that is an "f" because it doesn't exist, but
you can find an e.
I bought one of
Shane Nelson's excellent transformers (the stainless version, but
the plated version should be fine for people that aren't obsessed
with stainless like former salt water radio officers like myself.
Highly
recommended.
73
DR