The following configuration changes to a
Kenwood
TH-D7AG will allow it to be used as a stand alone PropNET monitoring
setup, I haven't had time to explore all the possibilities here,
or see how well it can serve as a PropNET transmitter. Since the
rumor mill has always been that the Kenwood radio's (with the built in
APRS functions) and PropNET were not compatible, this should prove
interesting for those interested in PropNET and CU2QSO. I have no
idea or way to test if the Kenwood D700 mobile can be configured off of
APRS to become PropNET friendly, but I imagine it's likely to
work. I'd also be interested in knowing if this works on the
older D7's that don't have the "G" firmware in them.
I would not suggest that the D7 is a good way to monitor for DX packets
directly. The receiver is plenty hot, but the built in TNC
requires a moderately strong and relatively noise free signal to decode
reliably. Weak AX25 packet
decodes are probably best left to a hot 2m receiver feeding a KPC3+
running open squelch (hard to beat the KPC3+ for this purpose
IMHO). Now for monitoring what gets bounced in off your local
PropNET hub, the D7 appears to be just fine for that purpose and that's
what I was interested in to begin with. Neat to monitor for a
band opening using just a radio on your belt tuned to your local
PropNET hub/digi, no PC, no cables, all nice and self contained.
Around here in EM78pp, most 2m repeaters are pretty much gone the way
of 11 meters (or dead silent 99.9% of the time) so what a great use for
the 2m FM side of the D7, you can always leave the UHF side on the
local 440 repeater, grin. There's some options for the CU2QSO and
PropNET folks here.
Okay, how do you do it? Pretty easy, while I'll admit it's got a
glitch you need to be aware of. So here goes:
1. Obviously you need to be tuned in on 147.585 analog FM mode
(yeah there are a few of us playing around with digital voice on the
ham bands, aka Astro & etc). Data speed set to
1200 baud and so forth. Leave the TNC in APRS mode (not PACKET
mode) D7 owners know what I mean here.
2. In "Menu 2" (APRS cfg menu), you need to go to item "2-E" and
change the UNPROTOCOL value to VK (the altnet used by 2m
PropNET).
3. Reinitialize the TNC back into APRS mode (not PACKET mode) and
you should be working minus one glitch. You may need to go into
the UNPROTOCOL
menu and just thumb through the existing VK value and enter it to get
it to start decoding after a power up or the TNC has been
reinitialized for whatever the reason.
Note 1: If you power cycle or
reinitialize the TNC in any way, you will need to just go into the
UNPROTOCOL menu
item and click through it (not changing a thing) and enter, then things
will work again. Apparently the TNC doesn't load the VK value on
power on or reinitialization, it loads the hard coded APRS default EVEN
though when you check the menu item it will still show "VK" so it
doesn't work right till you force VK back into the UNPROTOCOL
settings. Seems just thumbing through the
menu gets it kick started. Go into the menu as if you're going to
change it, but just ok/enter right over the existing data and
presto. Maybe this is just a "G" version radio thing? Maybe
some of the folks with the older D7A and any of the D700 mobiles can
check this same trick and test these radios on PropNET. I've
tested this on a 439 MHz node at 9600 baud and a 441 MHz node at 1200
baud with the same results. Seems to be a glitch in how the TNC
reads in stored settings during reinitialization, just have to force
the UNPROTOCOL parm into it.
Note 2: You can turn tone encode/decode on, say 67.0 Hz if you
wish to mute the rx audio (doesn't impact it on tx or rx), not
a new trick with the D7 and not mandatory. Having tone/PL decode
on has no impact on the TNC's ability to decode incoming data, a high
five for the Kenwood engineers. This could, if done carefully and
expecting to be QRM'ed by the digi at times, allow limited voice comm's
on
the same channel alongside the data. Not my idea, the APRS
D7 folks have known and used this trick for sometime now. I think
most on APRS use 100.0 Hz, I just used 67.0 Hz as it's way down there
further
away from the data tone freq's, how much this matters???? 67.0 Hz
does seem to false a LOT less then 100 Hz does, especially if you're
around stations runny way too hot packet deviation. This PL trick is
only for "manned" mobiles only, please don't set PL encode/decode on
the digi's or home stations, reasons should be obvious.
Here's some screen shots of the D7 in action on 147.585 decoding
PropNET beacons from the local hub/digi (KD4EVB-12). Apologies
for my photography skills, not much better than my web design
skills. Page and pictures done in a bit of a rush, you get what
you paid for ;-)
New packets arrive and display on the screen and get stored in the
stations list just like APRS packets do and you can thumb through the
various screens for that particular station like so:
First screen:
Call and SID of station received.
Second screen:
Guess this is the D7's way of handling a packet with a grid in it
versus the
usual lat/lon data.
Third Screen:
PHG data and the first part of the comments following it.
Forth Screen:
Since I've got static position data in it, it can calc dist/bearing.
How accurate, it looks pretty darn close on.
Fifth Screen:
Since the hub/digi isn't sending lat/lon data, I assume this is
calculated off the
6 digi grid, maybe using the center of the grids? I haven't
checked yet to see
where these coordinates are in the grid
square. I tend to think they are darn
close. Good enough for aiming a
beam, CU2QSO, HAM-IM, etc.
Sixth Screen:
Since there's no wx data or moving object data to be displayed,
obviously
nothing to be show here, but I show the screen for completeness.
Even got a incoming packet when this was taken (busy light &
s-meter on)
Interesting to say the least for those of us with the Kenwoods that
enjoy PropNET and CU2QSO. Probably some kinks to work out, but
the basic functionality needed is there, just that one glitch that's
trivial to work around once you realize it's there.
My
thoughts on the future of APRS?
Well allow me to soapbox a bit:
As many have witnessed, the APRS scene has continued to degenerated
pretty severely, the last 2-3 years in particular. APRS faces
some serious problems going into the future and on it's present course
the future of APRS doesn't look either bright or very
clear. If you were to go back 2-3 (or more) years and read
over the main APRS SIG's you'd find the discussions on the SIG's back
then very similar to today's arguing (oops, I meant
discussions). In other words the same old problems remain, just
the problem has gotten worse and now in desperation the suggested
solutions and discussion have become more heated and usually even less
productive. This is because the APRS in general refuses to
address one of the key issues, you simply can't run that much user load
and functionality on a 2m 1200 baud channel, more less using a
unconnected packets. There's a brick wall of capacity there, that
even with all the protocol changes and user education is not going to
move or solve in the long run. Then you add to this a bunch
of serious ego's battling back and forth, folks with personal
agendas, then add in all kinds of opinions presented as fact without
any real world experimental data to back it up, stir in a few LIDs, a
pinch of folks suggesting solutions to a problem they clearly
don't understand, leaders taking the mainstream digipeating
protocols backwards instead of forward, and you've got the recipe for
the mess that is APRS on 144.390 in many areas. A mess that just
continues to get worse and affect more and more areas as the user load
ramps up. Yeah, I'm a little burned out on APRS ;-) PropNET
is so much more relaxed, focused, more to my VHF/UHF DXing interests,
and with clear goals and
future.....and it's still in it's infancy for all practical purposes.
Since PropNET is all about real world data, I offered up the few
screenshots of the D7 in action on PropNET. A picture is worth a
thousand words and a few million opinions eh? It can be done!
E-Mail: address on QRZ is good
Sorry, got to keep the spammers at bay.
Last Updated: 04-25-2004