ARRL Certification Program
Emergency Communications
Communications Technique

HomeCharterDeliverablesDevelopment Process  ForumList of forum members  Table of Contents Links and Items of Interest
  1. I.2.B.1 - Communications technique as it applies to public service & emergency communications
    1. Getting the message through - Power isn't everything

    2. In any communications systems, to improve communications, the goal is not to raise the signal power but to improve the difference between the signal and the noise levels to achieve reliable communications.  Therefore, there are things that can be done to reduce noise.  Similarly, there are techniques that can be used to reduce obstacles that are like noise in that they diminish or block successful communications.
    3. Basic Communications Model

    4. Any communications system can be modelled using these conceptual components: We will use this model to examine ways for improving emergency communications.
    5. Using the Basic Communications Model to Troubleshoot a breakdown in Emergency Communications

    6. Refer to the basic communications model supplied above.

      At times, commuications between two points can breakdown, resulting in reduced or non-existent communications.  Whenever there is a breakdown in communications, examine which component(s) are affected, and what can be done to mitigate the problem or workaround the limitation.  Similarly, by reviewing each component, small changes can be made to enhance the contribution made by that component.

    7. The Message
      1. Composing Formal Traffic
        • In most situations, the amateur is providing communications on behalf of a served agency.  An authorized person on staff with the agency would be originating and receiving these messages.  In the middle of an emergency, it is often possible that the staff person will overlook one or more key elements of a message.  As communications specialists, we can assist by "coaching" the person through the composition of the message and reviewing the message to see if it has the key elements in a good formal message.

          Good formal messages should include:
           

          • Addressee (full name, full title, agency, location, optional telephone number)
          [Body of the message]
          • What is the situation?
          • Who is the requestor?
          • What is being requested?  Is the request for a single item or a list of items? How many is needed or wanted?
          • When is it needed?
          • If known, indicate the sources where the items can be obtained.  If it is for a list of items, does it come from a single source?  If it comes from multiple sources, a message should be generated to each source.
          • Where should the material or people be sent?  Where is the transfer point?  Be specific and identify it down to the side of a building, as one can waste a lot of time walking around looking for buildings and walking around a building.
          • What are the available times for arrival?
          • Is the access to the site expected to be clear?
          • Who should the responder locate when he/she arrives?
          • Is there a frequency, telephone number or other means of contact in the local area?  Or, when the response is in progress?
          • Who should be notified when the response is under way?
          • Any other considerations?
          [Signature]
          • Signature (full name of sender, full title, agency, location, optional telephone number)


          In certain situations, the staff person may not be available and in the interest of time, the communicators may need to draft the message on behalf of that person or agency and have it ready for their review and approval before sending the traffic.  In these situations, it also pays to review the message for these elements.

          Sometimes, it may be important to send out information to the net about amateur radio operations that are not of direct consequence or interest to the served agency, however, it is important to other stations on the net to coordinate and sustain net operations.  Examples are establishing new nets, new stations on the nets, and mobiling fresh operators to relieve existing operators.  Therefore, these messages may often appear as informal traffic.  The informal traffic should also be reviewed before it is sent to see if it includes the information above.
           
           

    8. Encoding/Decoding -- Plain language and ITU phonetics, no slang

    9. The first aspect is looking at the encoding/decoding of the message.  Clearly, expressing a thought and composing it into a message is a human activity.  The choice of available communications media influences the size of the message, however, it is still a human that determines how a message is phrased and what it contains.  Therefore, you should observe the choice of words and operational prosigns that you use to effect the communications.
        In one situation, differing agencies had different procedural codes:
         
          • police department communications procedure encourages use of "10" codes
          • fire, ambulance, and public works use plain language.
          • oher municipalities have different standards.
          • hams involved in RACES, Salvation Army and Red Cross sometimes use "Q" signals, sometimes don't, some use "box alarms" and sometimes even use "10" signals.
          • REACT seems to use "10" signals.


        When each group communicates within themselves, this is not an issue.  However, in a recent mutual aid drill involving a simulated
        commuter train wreck with 80 casualties,  nearly 30 different entities were involved from 6 municipalities.  In the debrief, at least one
        significant error was traced to failure to use plain language (a dispatch order wasn't understood and needed rescue equipment rolled 20
        minutes late).

    10. Receiving techniques
    11. Sending techniques
    12. Communications Media - Using what ever mode/frequency necessary (may not be Ham Freq's)
      1.  
      2. The first contribution to the design of an effective emergency communications network is to reduce the number of elements in the communications media.  This includes:
        • Reducing the number of hops or stations that need  to relay the message.
        • Reducing the number of radio operators needed to handle the message.
        • Reducing the number of people involved in handling the message.
        Reducing the number of elements without a substantial drop in quality makes the total system more reliable.
           
      1. If one particular communictions media (radio/radio frequency) is not available or usable, as amateur radio operators, we can always switch to another band or method that is usable.
      2. At other times, it may be using telephone or radio systems that are not within the amateur radio service.  For example, you might be called upon to be a relief operator for a local government radio system, such as for civil defense.  You should make an effort to become familiar with their operating practices, including the sequence of calling/called stations, and procedural codes that may be in use.  Also, take some time to familiarize yourself with the phone (PBX) system, nearby fax machines, and e-mail systems that might be present.  Even copy machines should be considered communications equipment, as the copies you make communicate with other people.

      3.  
      4. As emergency communicators, our mission and goal is to pass the message accurately, in a timely fashion and in a usable form to the destination.  That means that at times, we may have to step aside from our radios and use other prudent methods to get the job done.  At times, it might be best to hand over the microphone to the person wishing to speak, so he can say the message to the recipient directly -- thereby cutting out one delay in the relaying of the message.  If we're holding the microphone, we become part of the communications media and can reduce the reliability of the message.

      5.  
      6. Even non-electronic signalling methods are forms of emergency communications.  If you are directing rescue workers to a unfamiliar scene (such as via a military helicopter), you can instruct party at the rescue scene to move a police car near a suitable landing site closest to the scene, and have them activate the rooftop flashing lights to guide the incoming helicopter to that location.  If you can send messages to both parties to co-ordinate the hook-up using the visual flashing light, that will better ensure that minimal time is used to locate the rescue and evacuation scene.
      1. Lastly, in times of communications difficulties, do not hesitate to talk on "your" frequency, and listen out of band to the transmissions of another agency.  If they have access to a scanner, they likewise can listen out-of-band to your transmissions and thereby achieve reliable two-way contact.
    13. Noise in the Communications Media
      1. Noise in the communications media can take many forms.  In radio communications, it can take the form of static, adjacent channel interference, intermod and other similar interference.
      2. In the audio portion, conversations by nearby bystanders can interfere with your ability to hear the radio.
      3. Poor lighting or other distractions are another form of noise.
      4. Codes used to facilitate and expedite handling by the operators in one radio system could be misinterpreted or ignored by another set of operators in another system.  The "signal" in one system becomes "noise" in another.  Use plain messages instead of procedural codes to communicate requests such as "send an ambulance" or "send a work crew to...".
      5. Relaying the messages through multiple stations can cause distortions and other mishandling of the message.  Minimize the amount of message handling required.
      6. Where possible, examine the environment and see what you can do to reduce the amount of noise present at your station, which increases your ability to receive the message clearly.


      These are all smart ways of making a "better communications medium".

QUESTIONS
HomeCharterDeliverablesDevelopment Process  ForumList of forum members  Table of Contents Links and Items of Interest

Welcome...you are visitor number since May 27, 2000

Comments are welcome.
Pat Lambert, W0IPL is the focal point of the effort.
Ron Hashiro, AH6RH is the webmaster for the team charter.
Dan Miller, K3UFG is the ARRL staff person for the effort.
Find out more by contacting:  [email protected]
Copyright © 2000 Ron Hashiro
Permission granted to ARRL with appropriate acknowledgment
for use in development in amateur radio certification
Updated: July 23, 2000