Mode Comparisons

Bandwidth

Because it has 64 tones, the MT63 transmission is quite wide (usually 1 kHz), and it has a harsh rushing sound. It has sharply defined edges, so it is possible to fit two MT63 transmissions in the width of an SSB transmission. Yes, MT63 is still less than half the bandwidth of an SSB transmission.


Bandwidth Comparison

Throughput - Ideal

MT63 may seem rather wide for a digital transmission, but bear in mind that it offers 100 WPM performance, and is no wider than a 75 baud 850 shift RTTY signal, or twice as wide as a 45 baud 170 shift RTTY signal (yes, OK, or 20 PSK31 signals). While wider than HF packet (300 baud, 500 Hz), it offers better throughput under most conditions. Packet and most other ARQ modes only give their maximum throughput under ideal conditions.


Bandwidth Comparison

Note - PACTOR 2™ and PACTOR 3™ are considered non-Amateur modes and are not compared.

Throughput - Poor Conditions

The throughput of ARQ modes deteriorates markedly under less than perfect conditions, whereas FEC modes "hang in" and drop out suddenly.There is invariably some dispute about how well ARQ modes perform under poor conditions. The following table attempts to compare throughput under good and poor conditions found from practical experience. Voice SSB is shown as a reference.

ModeBandwidth HzWPM (Good) WPM (Poor)
MT63 1K 1000100 100
MT63 2K2000 200200
PSK3160 5050
HF Packet500 2000
Amtor ARQ30050 0 - 1
Pactor 3002000 - 10
Clover500200 0 - 10
75/850 RTTY 12001000
45/170 RTTY30060 0
Voice SSB 24002505-10
Throughput Comparisons

Latency

Latency is a measure of the time taken for transmitted data to pass through the transmission and reception equipment. As a simple example, it takes 165ms to transmit a 45 baud RTTY character via a UART, and the same to receive it - a total Latency of 330ms. Compared with this, the propagation delay half-way around the world (65 ms) and the delay through the transmitter and receiver filters (perhaps 10ms) are small.

In a way, Latency is a measure of the "slick-ness" of a radio mode, since it strongly affects the turn-around time, which is the time from the last transmitted character being sent from the keyboard, to the time the first character in the return direction appears on the screen. The turn-around time is at least twice the Latency, since the return process cannot start until the last character has been received. Other factors such as propagation delays, key-up time and any preamble that is to be transmitted must be added as well.

The following table gives Latency estimates for MT63 andsome common HF (non-ARQ) modes.

ModeVersionLatency (sec)
MT63 500Hzshort12.8
MT63 500Hzlong25.6
MT63 1Kshort6.4
MT63 1Klong12.8
MT63 2Kshort3.2
MT63 2Klong6.4
PSK31-<1
MFSK16-6
Amtor FEC-<1
45 baud RTTY-<1
Latency Comparisons

It is obvious that MT63 is not very "slick". The "turn-around time" in MT63 1K with short interleave is at least 12.8 seconds! In addition, if conditions are especially poor, it can take the MT63 receiver a significant time to acquire lock, so the figures in the table are optimistic.


Copyright © M. Greenman 1997-2005. All rights reserved. Contact the author before using any of this material.
home HOME