From: Zabinski, Patrick J. (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 08:13:32 PST
If I misled you/anyone and said it was "better", then my mistake. I simply
tried to state that quad stripline was "adequate/sufficient" for our
and hense implied that triple stripline was likely to be as well.
By no means did I intentionally mean to say that it was "better".
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] : layer stackup
> Well, now you've got me confused. Why is it better to pick
> up .707 of the
> impinging field(s) vs 0? Or is it a routing density issue
> that forces the
email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:30:24 PDT