**From:** Barry Ward (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Tue Nov 21 2000 - 10:17:17 PST

**Next message:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Previous message:**Charles Grasso: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Capacitor dielectric type"**Next in thread:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Charles Hill: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Reply:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Larry Miller: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Reply:**Derrick Stikeleather: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**[email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"

I have read about the newer Cat 6 & 7 twisted pairs with their gigahertz data rates. From transmission line theory I understand that the distance between the conductors and the dielectric constant of the intervening material are the primary factors determining the capacitance and thus the impedance. But the new Cat 6 & 7 cables have very tight specs for the lay, or twisting, of the pairs. I am forced to believe that the lay and its consistency is therefore also very important. I assume some of this is for crosstalk reasons (the longer the distance between any repetition of the lay the less the x-talk), but is some of it also for impedance reasons? What is the math behind any of this (assuming a single pair surrounded by air for an infinite distance). Approximately how does this math change when multiple pairs are cabled together?

Any answers would be greatly appreciated. I work for a cable manufacturer where we build cables with twisted pairs. We work in relatively low frequencies (up to 10 MHz), and the lay does not seem to be too critical. We untwist the pairs for a couple of inches at the ends of the cable to terminate the wires at connectors; this does not seem to make the cable unusable.

Again, thanks for any information.

Barry Ward

GeoSpace LP

[email protected]

713-939-7093

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to

[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE

si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.

si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

****

**Next message:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Previous message:**Charles Grasso: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Capacitor dielectric type"**Next in thread:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Charles Hill: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Reply:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**Larry Miller: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Reply:**Derrick Stikeleather: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"**Maybe reply:**[email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Twisted Pair Impedance"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue May 08 2001 - 14:30:12 PDT
*