Re: [SI-LIST] : FW: Spectraquest Vs. XTK/XNS

From: Michael Nudelman ([email protected])
Date: Wed Nov 08 2000 - 07:30:12 PST

• Next message: Michael Nudelman: "[SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest Vs. XTK/XNS"
• Previous message: Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Inductor Selection"
• In reply to: Hassan Ali: "RE: [SI-LIST] : FW: Spectraquest Vs. XTK/XNS"
• Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : FW: Spectraquest Vs. XTK/XNS"

To all SI_LIST correspondents:

I think, this was somewhat discussed before, but...

What would be your recommendation for PCB simulation tools (SI -
Transmission line/termination, x-talk, etc.)

I worked with Hyperlynx in the past and I did like the tool a lot; but
as my superiors put it: at this kind of price we have to look at
alternatives first.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Mike.

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****

• Next message: Michael Nudelman: "[SI-LIST] : SpecctraQuest Vs. XTK/XNS"
• Previous message: Ingraham, Andrew: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Inductor Selection"
• In reply to: Hassan Ali: "RE: [SI-LIST] : FW: Spectraquest Vs. XTK/XNS"
• Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : FW: Spectraquest Vs. XTK/XNS"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 08 2001 - 14:30:00 PDT