From: Larry Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jun 13 2000 - 06:54:45 PDT
All your symptoms seem to point to you having a 100 Mb/s link-- the 30 and
55 MHz bumps, the fact that you get significant emissions even when you are
not sending data (100TX sends a scrambled idle stream as noisy as data,
10-BASE-T only sends little link test pulses at 60/sec).
The difference in emission levels between UTP and STP sounds pretty right,
too. UTP is, after all, UNshielded. And, yes we have a hard time meeting
Class B. UTP walks the edge.
So why do people use UTP?
The answer will be found when you go to buy a significant amount of cable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 6:07 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [SI-LIST] : radiated emissions from Ethernel twisted pair
> I have a somewhat EMC oriented question. I hope this does not interfere
> with the more
> usual signal integrity stuff.
> I have done radiated emission measurements and conducted immunity testing
> on one of our
> printers. The printer is connected to Ethernet, which is the main point of
> my questions.
> I have tested the Ethernet interface with cat. 5 shielded (STP) and cat.5
> unshielded twisted
> pair (UTP) running at 10Mbit/s or 10baseT (though I can not exclude
> 100baseT because
> the printer Etherent hardware features auto-negotiation). The printer is
> in an anechoic room
> were it communicates with a labtop outside. At the feedthrough point their
> is a big ferrite
> absorbing clamp. The cable length inside the shielded room is 5m. We use
> ping command to transmit small packets between the printer and the laptop.
> Neglecting the printer emissions we found that there are emissions due to
> the Ethernet
> cable itself. The emissions disappear if we diconnect or shutdown the
> external laptop.
> The emissions are not due to the external laptop, which we checked by
> powering down the
> For our setup the Etnernet radiated emissions are concentrated between 30
> and 55MHz, with two
> characteristic humps at about 35MHz and 43MHz.
> The STP cable performs about 6 to 8dB better than the UTP, that is, the
> radiation is
> lower with the STP. We also performed RF conducted immunity test on the
> Ethernet cable.
> The result is similar: the STP cable is about 2 to 3 times less
> The UTP cable has about 3-4dB margin with class A CISPR 22, the STP cable
> more than 8dB
> for radiated emissions.
> These are the facts. The question is the following: if the emission is due
> to the
> Ethernet cable and we have not made any errors with regard to the layout
> (of the PCB
> with the Ethernet circuits) then can we conclude that we are measuring the
> of the twisted pair cable and the Ethernet signaling? What I find
> disturbing is the low
> margin (or no margin at all) with respect to the class B limit. Does
> anyone had similar
> experiences? How do you test for radiated emission? Does one disable
> Ethernet during the
> test (cable left in place)?
> Thanks in advance.
> Jan Vercammen
> EMC/PCB Engineering
> Agfa-Gevaert NV, Belgium
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:35 PST