**From:** Doug (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Thu Jun 01 2000 - 08:37:21 PDT

**Next message:**Mike Saunders: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Power Supply---get a clean +/-5V from PCI slot of PC?"**Previous message:**George Chi: "[SI-LIST] : job position"**In reply to:**Dennis Tomlinson: "Re: [SI-LIST] : RE: Split Plane"**Next in thread:**Doug Brooks: "RE: [SI-LIST] : RE: Split Plane"

Dennis Tomlinson wrote:

*>
*

*> [email protected] wrote:
*

*> >
*

*> > Doug et al-
*

*> > Has anyone extended the '0.35' rule beyond single-order systems?
*

*> > Terman's
*

*> > Radio Engineers Handbook talks about '0.45' for multi-order waveforms
*

*> > with overshoots in the 10% range - but doesn't reference any derivation.
*

*> > I'd be curious about high Q networks up to 50% for ex.
*

*> > Anyone?
*

*>
*

*> I'll take a shot at a second order low pass with two infinite zeros. It
*

*> may necessarily contain terms like Q or z[eta], and w0 in addition to
*

*> BW (a function of z and w0). I expect the result to be mucked up a
*

*> bit more that the first order case.
*

*>
*

*> One caveat, It'll have to wait for the weekend. Anyone else wishing to
*

*> take a crack at it is welcome.
*

Sure.

The classical +/-3dB point at critical is based on a

circuit with real poles or zeros with the transfer

function of the form

H(s) = 20*log(sqrt[(wT)^2 + 1])^(+/-N)

or

H(s) = +/-10*N*log[(w^2)(T^2) + 1]

At the knee where w = 1/T, and N = 1, we have

H(s) = +/-10*log[2] = +/-3dB

Specifying something out to the +/-6dB point implies

(w^2)(T^2) + 1 = 4

where

w = sqrt(3)/T = 1.7/T

We're talking circuit response here.

And lumped parameters no less.

Another circuit that has a transfer function of

complex conjugate poles and zeros of the form

will behave in an entirely different manner.

But this all implies a signal input of constant

amplitude from DC to daylight. Such is not the

case with the odd waveforms dealt with in the

real world where Fourier demonstrates something

different. And where with some waveforms, the

7th harmonic can become nearly insignificant.

Thus it becomes painfully apparent to me that

mucho stuff is being assumed. And who said

engineering is supposed to be an exact science?

- Doug McKean

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to

[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE

si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.

si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

****

**Next message:**Mike Saunders: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Power Supply---get a clean +/-5V from PCI slot of PC?"**Previous message:**George Chi: "[SI-LIST] : job position"**In reply to:**Dennis Tomlinson: "Re: [SI-LIST] : RE: Split Plane"**Next in thread:**Doug Brooks: "RE: [SI-LIST] : RE: Split Plane"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:30 PST
*