From: Barry Ma (email@example.com)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 10:49:38 PDT
Thanks for your long input. I'd like to make some comments below.
On Wed, 17 May 2000, George_Tang@Dell.com wrote:
> Large parallel plates behave as transmission lines. A quarter wavelength
> transmission line with a short at the end has infinite impedance, so
> capacitors placed 1/4 wavelength away are bad.
Thatís why decaps work on low frequency portion. Letís set 100 MHz and below for decaps to cover. The wavelength at 100 MHz is 3 meters. A quarter of it is 75 cm. Itís long enough to ordinary PCB size. (The cap is directly connected to pwr/gnd planes.)
> This means that we can loosely define the largest usable board area capacitance as 1/8
> wavelength radius of copper surrounding the IC power pin. Charges stored on the planes
> further than 1/8 wavelength away are not very usable due to the time delay.
> At 500MHz in FR4, 1/8 wavelength is 1.5 inches. Is such a board capacitor
> good enough for your IC?
George, I beg for differentials. How did you jump from "capacitors placed 1/4 wavelength away are bad" to "the largest usable board area capacitance as 1/8 wavelength radius"?
Can I use the same token to infer from "caps placed one wavelength away are good" to "the largest usable board area capacitance is within 1/2 wavelength radius"? And so, and so on.
Why pay when you don't have to? Get AltaVista Free Internet Access now!
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:24 PST