[SI-LIST] : RE: [SI-LIST] Charge moving from decoupling capacitors

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Ingraham, Andrew (Andrew.Ingraham@compaq.com)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 14:49:27 PDT

>The decap should be much closer than 0.5 Tr to be of use.
This is the upper limit. Beyond 0.5*Tr (even at 0.5*Tr), the caps would be
totally ineffective within a risetime.

To be effective, there has to be time for the sag to propagate out to the
cap, and time for the replenishing current to propagage back. 2*0.5*Tr =
Tr, meaning the current from the cap wouldn't arrive at the IC until the
very end of the risetime.

>If Tr = 1 ns, the corresponding distance is approximately equal to 14
>cm in FR4. There's no problem to locate decaps much closer than 7 cm,
>following your opinion. If Tr = 0.2 ns (likely happens in 5 - 10 years)
Happening today!

People are already seeing sub- 0.1ns edges from (some) CMOS, depending on
the IC package.

In 5-10 years they could get a lot faster still.

>How did you jump from "capacitors placed 1/4 wavelength away are bad"
>to "the largest usable board area capacitance as 1/8 wavelength
1/4 wavelength is the shortest distance where this effect (ideal caps
looking like an open circuit) happens. The idea is that if you restrict
yourself to about half that, you would avoid that problem; at least for most
digital designs (see below).

>Can I use the same token to infer from "caps placed one wavelength
>away are good" to "the largest usable board area capacitance is
>within 1/2 wavelength radius"? And so, and so on.
No, unless you are working with just RF. Most digital designs operate over
a frequency range from DC to some upper limit. A cap that is one wavelength
away at one frequency, would be 1/4 wavelength away at 1/4 the frequency.
For digital designs, that would be bad.

Sprinkling capacitors over various distances helps partly avoid problems
with capacitors at odd multiples of 1/4 wavelength.


**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:22 PST