**From:** Vinu Arumugham (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Mon May 08 2000 - 10:24:36 PDT

**Next message:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : May 9th Presentation: "Radiation from Edge Effects in Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs)""**Previous message:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**In reply to:**Neven Pischl: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Next in thread:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Reply:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Reply:**Neven Pischl: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"

Can free space be modeled as a network of transmission lines, arranged in such

a manner that the impedance seen looking into any two points in space, is 377

ohm?

Thanks,

Vinu

Neven Pischl wrote:

*> Here's my $0.02.
*

*>
*

*> The scenario doesn't work because it roughly assumes that if you have a 377
*

*> Ohm source, and a 377-Ohm resistor somewhere in free space, that you will
*

*> have max power transfer (even without any other connection). That's what you
*

*> are saying when you say that half power would go through the space (at least
*

*> it seams to me so).
*

*>
*

*> It mixes the wave-guiding concept in which there is at least two-conductor
*

*> structure that guides EM-waves, and it is characterized by its
*

*> characteristic impedance, with the free-space EM-wave propagation in which
*

*> the intrinsic impedance of the medium (not characteristic impedance of a
*

*> waveguide) is 377 ohm. There is an analogy between these two ways of
*

*> propagation, in terms of mathematical description, but the terms do not have
*

*> the same meaning.
*

*>
*

*> Same as a 377 ohm line will not radiate half power to the space, when
*

*> immersed into the EM field, it will not couple half power of the field
*

*> (which should happen if the concept is right).
*

*>
*

*> It can be seen that the concept does not work also if you examine a 50-Ohm
*

*> air- microstrip. If you assume the concept of splitting power between the
*

*> line and the air, 50/377 of the total power which is about 0.13 (or 13%)
*

*> would always be lost to the space, even in a perfectly matched 50-Ohm
*

*> system. We know that it does not happen when you connect a matched load,
*

*> source and a line.
*

*>
*

*> Neven
*

*>
*

*> ----- Original Message -----
*

*> From: Vinu Arumugham <[email protected]>
*

*> To: <[email protected]>
*

*> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 5:55 PM
*

*> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection
*

*>
*

*> > If you were able to connect a transmitter to a receiver using a 377 ohm
*

*> > transmission line, this line would be in parallel to the "transmission
*

*> > line" between the two formed by free space. Therefore, one half the
*

*> > transmitted power would go through free space and the other half through
*

*> > the line. As the line impedance is lowered, more power would be
*

*> > transmitted through the line and less through space.
*

*> >
*

*> > What's wrong with this scenario?
*

*> >
*

*> > Thanks,
*

*> > Vinu
*

*> >
*

*> > Mary wrote:
*

*> >
*

*> > > Somone recently claimed that higher impedance transmission lines
*

*> > > radiate more because their impedance is closer to the 377-ohm
*

*> > > impedance of free space. This is not true. It is not possible
*

*> > > to judge anything about the radiation from a transmission line
*

*> > > based on the value of its characteristic impedance.
*

*> > >
*

*> > > Characteristic impedance is the ratio of voltage to current in a
*

*> > > forward traveling wave. The ratio of electric to magnetic field
*

*> > > strength in a free-space transmission line is approximately
*

*> > > 377 ohms regardless of what the characteristic impedance is.
*

*> > > Even if you were to build a transmission line with a 377-ohm
*

*> > > characteristic impedance, there is no reason to believe it would
*

*> > > radiate any better or worse than a 300-ohm or a 400-ohm line.
*

*> > >
*

*> > > Mary
*

*> > >
*

*> > > **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
*

*> > > [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
*

*> > > si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> > > si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> > > ****
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*> > **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
*

*> > [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
*

*> > si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> > si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> > ****
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*>
*

*> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
*

*> [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
*

*> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
*

*> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
*

*> ****
*

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to

[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE

si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.

si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

****

**Next message:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : May 9th Presentation: "Radiation from Edge Effects in Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs)""**Previous message:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**In reply to:**Neven Pischl: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Next in thread:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Reply:**Doug McKean: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"**Reply:**Neven Pischl: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Trace Impedance Selection"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:13 PST
*