**From:** *[email protected]*

**Date:** Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:49:28 PDT

**Next message:**Chris Cheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of Power Pl anes"**Previous message:**Mike Jenkins: "Re: [SI-LIST] : differential impedance"**Next in thread:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of PowerPlanes"**Reply:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of PowerPlanes"

Chris:

To partition the discussion...

<<Do you know if the fringing (NEAR) fields in a board NOT using 20H can

radiate DIRECTLY into the far field significantly given typical excitation

(say <500mv up to 1GHz) or must these NEAR fringing fields couple onto a

more efficient far field radiator first?>>

I'll bound your question so as to minimize possible misinterpretations of

"...in a board..." If you are referring to radiation from traces on the

surface of a PCB that are well inboard of the PCB edges, they will radiate

the same independently of any power plane setback. (You may check out the

IBM paper presented about three (four?) years ago at the IEEE EMC Conference

in San Diego, CA, for the effects of trace spacing from PCB edges.) If you

are (as I suspect) referring only to those emanations from the PCB plane

edges (without any power plane setback), YES, direct radiation will result,

and ALSO additional radiation will occur with coupling. When the interplanar

TEM wave hits the open edge, it does not see an infinite impedance. Rather,

the energy wave sees an impedance transformation from the low (transmission

line) impedance of the planar structure to the 120*PI=377 ohms of free space.

This is equivalent to a sizable impedance mismatch which will normally yield

poor energy transfer; however, the fields (and currents) "spill over" on the

copper edges of each/both planes and transfer energy (through continuing

propagation) in both directions along the edges. Some energy also folds back

on the outside surfaces of the planes. Henry Merkelo (Heads up EMC studies

at U. of Illinois, international lecturer, knows his stuff) has produced

several excellent papers over the last few years that uses software to

illustrate these effects. This added effect increases the efficiency of the

coupling to free space (as well as to other traces that may radiate more

efficiently) and results in increased levels of radiation from the PCB. The

worst case of radiation induced from this action will be when the TEM

harmonic(s) coincide with the surface/outside resonance of the PCB structure.

In that case, substantial radiation will result. This is yet another

example of why potential EMI sources are best suppressed at the source,

because there are multiple mechanisms of "leaking" RF energy from a PCB.

As an added note, the common manufacturing practice of extending the PCB

dielectric beyond ALL PCB copper layers captures more of the field lines at

the abrupt impedance interface and reduces the radiated energy somewhat (but

not nearly as much as the 20H setback).

With consideration for all the preceding SI Reflector discussions on this and

related topics, do not forget that much of this potential radiation can be

suppressed or contained by good bypassing (and/or dissipative absorption)

around the edges of the PCB. By forcing a voltage minimum (as best as good

bypassing can) at the PCB edges, the PCB resonant waves (representing the

most efficient radiating frequencies) are forced to voltage maximums on the

more lossy interior of the PCB. Any fields that try to radiate more easily

find termination somewhere on the PCB and are thus reduced. I extolled the

virtues of this phenomenon in my presentation at the EMC '98 Colloquium and

Exhibition, "PCB Design Issues at the Macroscopic Level." The same concepts

are carried forth in recent papers by Larry Smith and Istvan Novak, both at

Sun Microsystems (although on different sides of the continent).

*********************

..to continue...

<<As the planes move further apart from each other I expect the "far field

direct radiation" to increase but I'm curious that if planes are very

closely spaced that it is possible to radiate directly.>>

Your expectation regarding further separation of the planes is valid.

Referring to the discussion presented above, the interplanar transmission

line impedance is raised by the further separation which provides a more

efficient impedance match to the impedance of free space; hence, more energy

transfer (through radiation) will occur. A good illustration of this effect

is evidenced by the easily demonstrated (and measured) radiation from a

single microstrip. Measure the radiation at any given frequency from a 50

ohm line, then repeat the same measurement for a 100 ohm line. The Zo

increase was 2:1 or 6 dB, but the measured radiation from the 100 ohm line is

8 to 10 dB higher than the 50 ohm line. FYI, radiated emissions prediction

software (such as EMCAD1 from CKC Labs) predict this same result. For the

planar case, since the impedance mismatch is on the order of 200 to 400 to

one, I would expect a more linear correlation rather than an amplified one.

That is, a one ohm planar Zo increasing to two ohms would probably give 6 dB

increase in energy transfer.

Hope this helps.

Mike

Michael L. Conn

Owner/Principal Consultant

Mikon Consulting

*** Serving Your Needs with Technical Excellence ***

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to

[email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE

si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.

si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

****

**Next message:**Chris Cheng: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of Power Pl anes"**Previous message:**Mike Jenkins: "Re: [SI-LIST] : differential impedance"**Next in thread:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of PowerPlanes"**Reply:**Chris Rokusek: "RE: [SI-LIST] : 20-H Rule and Self-Resonant Frequency of PowerPlanes"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:50:03 PST
*