From: Nirmal Jain (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2000 - 13:58:46 PST
Your gnd/pwr via inductance for P-S-G-S stackup would definitely be
smaller but you would now have a smaller integrated decap between gnd
and pwr planes and also you may have higher L for the discrete deccap
connections to the gnd and pwr planes. So this stack up may need further
analysis if SSN is an issue.
> Adding to the original question; what are the opinions about a P-S-G-S
> Keep the spacing between the ground & the signal layers the same and as
> close as possible. This will keep a more uniform impedance (whatever it is)
> and shorten the via barrel length (and resulting L) for the signal traces.
> The signal lines are tightly coupled to the same reference plane ... just
> different sides. Might this reduce high frequency mode conversion that
> occurs with fast edge rates on longer vias between loosely coupled (or at
> least seldom tight enough) layers such as power & ground?
> If there are a large amount of outer layer signal lines, then more careful
> attention might have to made to ensure that the inner signal lines'
> characteristics more closely match the outer. Such as moving the power
> plane further away to reduce its effect on the inner signal layer. And,
> adjusting the inner layer signal line widths to compensate for being
> embedded in the dielectric as well as some effect of the power plane.
> Jeff Walden
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:35:21 PDT