From: Scott McMorrow ([email protected])
Date: Wed Jan 19 2000 - 10:28:35 PST
ICX also offers multistage driver support.
This is the IBIS [Driver Schedule] construct.
Additionally, the advanced scripting capability of
the tool is quite awesome.
Tadashi ARAI wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> It may be important what type of methodology you use in your design.
> Hyperlynx is easier to use than the others, but poor functions such that
> small waveform viewer window gives limited information, not IBIS v.3.x
> supported, etc.
> ICX is great, if you design your PCB layout yourself, with rule-driven
> assistance router. Supporting IBIS v.3.x is good, but multi-staged (or
> some advanced function of ) QUAD model is not supported as far as I
> You will need many time initially to use ICX as whole degign checker,
> because you must enter many parameters of rules database, besides you
> must wait for a long time during the calculation.
> XTK is my favorite, but some more complex than the others. You may need
> to take a time to learn XTK, but with a help of good documents, you will
> soon make it use easier. Model support is great, IBIS 3.x is of course.
> It is not so sofisticated like other new tools, but text (ASCII) based
> databases are easy to manage than the other GUI oriented tools in the
> case of such as you stack with uncertain trouble.
> My impressions are ...
> Hyperlynx ICX XTK
> -------------- ------------------- ----------------- ----------------
> Model Support **2** **3** **4**
> (Native: IBIS 2.x IBIS 3.x Quad native )
> (Board disc.: EBD TOPSPEC )
> line only)
> (Converted: old-Quad IBIS 3.x )
> Ease of Use **5** **3** **3**
> (Very easy! But (Sofisticated. (Need to learn.
> simple can do only But bit complex.) But is easy.)
> Rule Checking **1** **5** **3**
> (You must do it (Great checking (Check by the
> manually.) functions.) report output.
> What-if **3** **3** **4**
> "What is what-if is what you want to what-if function."(?)
> Multi-board **1** **3** **4**
> (Can it ?) (Need x-tra cost.) (Need to learn.)
> Tool support **4** **4** **3**
> "If your CAD was interfaced, it is enough. Isn't it ?"
> //// /// // / / / / / / / / /
> Tadashi Arai//Platform Developing Dept.,Desktop Prd Div. Fujitsu Limited
> [email protected] TEL:+81-42-370-7617 Inagi-shi, Tokyo, Japan
> / / / / / / / / / / / // ///
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:16:15 -0500
> Mail from [email protected] described as below:
> > Dear Gentleman,
> > My company is in the process of evaluation several Signal Integrity Tools such
> > as XTK, ICX and Hyperlynx.
> > We eliminated Hyperlynx already. Our requirements are to design a 19 slot
> > chassis ( main card, backplane and several plug in cards). We have several
> > high
> > speed (622Mbs) BLVDS buses, ethernet, gigabit, OC12, OC48, 128 MHz 64 bit DRAM
> > buses (1Gig), PECL We are focusing on model support, easy of use, rules
> > checking, what-if, multi-board, tool support.
> > I would be interested in any feedback as to your experience in using these
> > tools
> > (Pros and Cons).
> > Thanks
> > Tony
> > **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]
> > In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
> > si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > ****
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
-- Scott McMorrow Principal Engineer SiQual, Signal Quality Engineering 18735 SW Boones Ferry Road Tualatin, OR 97062-3090 (503) 885-1231 http://www.siqual.com
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:34:43 PDT