RE: [SI-LIST] : XTK vs ICX

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Dan Bostan (dan@corvia.com)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2000 - 10:02:42 PST


call me at 408.752.0550/x111

thanks,

dan bostan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
[mailto:owner-si-list@silab.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of
tony.scarangella@wwgsolutions.com
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 5:16 AM
To: si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
Subject: [SI-LIST] : XTK vs ICX

Dear Gentleman,

My company is in the process of evaluation several Signal Integrity Tools
such
as XTK, ICX and Hyperlynx.
We eliminated Hyperlynx already. Our requirements are to design a 19 slot
chassis ( main card, backplane and several plug in cards). We have several
high
speed (622Mbs) BLVDS buses, ethernet, gigabit, OC12, OC48, 128 MHz 64 bit
DRAM
buses (1Gig), PECL We are focusing on model support, easy of use, rules
checking, what-if, multi-board, tool support.

I would be interested in any feedback as to your experience in using these
tools
(Pros and Cons).

Thanks
Tony

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:34:38 PDT