Re: [SI-LIST] : What's your favorite Screwy SI Concept?

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: John Howard (jhoward@emcguru.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2000 - 11:25:05 PST


Hi Doug,
     While I don't feel huge argument with any of the foregoing I do think
one important point is missing (at least I missed it). I believe it is much
more important to maintain a uniform conductor cross section than to
exert great effort in avoiding a right angle turn. As someone mentioned,
a right angle turn isn't noticably detrimental until the dimensions of the
turn are comparable to a wavelength (at the highest frequency of interest).
However a change in the cross section dimensions will affect the
incremental inductance and capacitance at the point where the cross
section changes. It is a minor challange to fabricate a right angle trace
turn without changing the trace width - but worth the effort if you intend
to propagate high frequency energy.
     I've just joined this group........greetings to all!
John

Doug McKean wrote:

> Interesting comments. Anyone have any data on right
> angles in traces causing an increase in crosstalk?
>
> Regards, Doug McKean
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 11:34:36 PDT