**From:** Istvan Novak - Board Design Technology (*[email protected]*)

**Date:** Mon Nov 08 1999 - 11:41:55 PST

**Next message:**Larry Smith: "Re: [SI-LIST] : RE: Capacitor Inductance"**Previous message:**[email protected]: "[SI-LIST] : RE: Capacitor Inductance"**Maybe in reply to:**Larry Smith: "[SI-LIST] : Capacitor Inductance (was: Comment on Johnson's article)"

Larry,

I beleive at the dimensions that we are now using around bypass capacitors we cannot use

the 'incremental' counting of total inductance. As you stated accurately, it is the

mounted inductance that matters. The mounted inductance (except the plane inductance) is

really an inductance of a loop, where the inductance of a stand alone capacitor is its

partial inductance. If we move the capacitors and planes closer, it will increase the

mutual inductance, and it eventually will reduce the loop inductance as well. So for a

500pH mounted inductance of a 805 capacitor, the self inductance of the capacitor may be

higher than 500pH to start with, and it is reduced by the mutual inductance.

Istvan Novak

SUN Microsystems

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 10:14:19 -0800 (PST)

From: Larry Smith <[email protected]>

Subject: [SI-LIST] : Capacitor Inductance (was: Comment on Johnson's article)

To: [email protected]

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-MD5: FFDb67h6eZ/PaEWBkrB//A==

I wanted to address several comments that have come back on the

subject of inductance of decoupling capacitors and vias. Rather

than further increasing the traffic on SI-list, I'll do it all

in one email. I have changed the thread title to better reflect

the subject at hand.

* > From: "Rick Brooks" <[email protected]>
*

* >
*

* > Has anybody ever tried 0508 caps (not 0805) with multiple trace/vias to
*

* > the planes?
*

* > It seems like a better idea for low inductance, but I don't know about
*

* > the cost or availability.
*

* >
*

* > - Rick Brooks
*

The 0508 capacitors have a little less inductance than 0805 capacitors

because the current path is wider and shorter. But this only effects

the 'partial inductance' due to the capacitor, which is usually small

compared to the total inductance. To understand the total inductance,

we must examine the entire loop associated with the capacitor

current. That includes not only the capacitor but the mounting pads,

traces (if any) vias and power planes underneath the capacitor.

For this discussion, let's define inductance in terms of energy stored

in the B field caused by the current flowing in this loop. Energy =

(L/2)*I^2, or one-half L I-squared. The energy is proportional to

inductance and the square of the current.

To reduce the inductance, we have to reduce the energy stored in the B

field. The best way to do that is to reduce the 'loop area' traversed

by the current because the B field is associated with this loop. The

loop may be marginally reduced by using shorter, wider capacitors, but

there are other things that are much more important. For example, the

distance between the vias to the power planes and the height of the

vias between the power planes and the solder pads. These are the

factors that greatly effect the inductance. As I mentioned in a

previous note, the partial inductance due to an 0805 capacitor is 0.2

to 0.4 nH, depending on the height. The partial inductance contributed

by the height and separation of vias is 0.5 to 2nH. The mounting

inductance must be carefully controlled before it makes sense to use

'low inductance' capacitors.

* > From: Keith Howard <[email protected]>
*

* >
*

* > Larry,
*

* >
*

* > The low inductance capacitors from AVX have 8 or more leads, so require
*

* > multiple vias into the planes.
*

* > Unless you're talking about multiple vias in parallel with the required
*

* > vias.
*

* >
*

* > Keith
*

Some configurations of the AVX capacitor have multiple leads in

a vdd/gnd checkerboard pattern, which nearly forces you to make a

checkerboard pattern of vias (possibly 8 of them) under the capacitor.

This is VERY good for low inductance. We have now broken up the loop

into at least 8 parallel loops, greatly reducing the inductance.

But in many cases, you could have just put the multiple vias in parallel

(not in a checkerboard pattern) and mounted a dumb old 0805 capacitor

on them. There would be almost as much improvement in the inductance

and you can skip the expensive part. That is because the inductance

is in the design of the vias, mounting pads and distance to the power

planes, with only a minor amount attributed to the capacitor.

* > Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 17:53:09 -0800
*

* > From: Ron Miller <[email protected]>
*

* >
*

* > Also note that ATC recommends that their microwave capacitors be
*

* > mounted on their side so that the resonances from the top layers and
*

* > bottom layers of the cap are all the same length from the input and output
*

* > trace, which shifts the SRF up somewhat.
*

* >
*

* > For those caps that have very thin height it probably doesn't matter, but
*

* > for the cube shaped ones it does.
*

* >
*

* > Ron Miller
*

After significantly reducing the pad and via inductance, the biggest

inductance contribution is from the height of the capacitor. For large

'cubic' shaped capacitors, current must go a long distance up the post

of the capacitor before it can cross over through the plates of the

capacitor and go back down the other post. This essentially increases

the loop area of the capacitor. Note that power planes in the PCB may

be 10 mils or less below the surface of the PCB, but capacitors may be

40 mils high. With carefully chosen PCB stackups (power planes near

the surface) and carefully designed vias and solder pads, it is

possible for the dominant inductance to be in the height of the

capacitor.

As Ron has mentioned above, you can see the effect of the capacitor

height inductance on an impedance analyzer just by turning the cubic

capacitor 90 degrees on it's side. It is difficult to know which

direction the capacitor posts go just by looking at it. But if you

mount it on an impedance analyzer with the posts vertical, two

impedance dips can sometimes be seen. The low frequency resonance is

from the mounted loop inductance. The higher frequency minimum is due

to inductance internal to the capacitance. Current is sloshing around

between the top and bottom plates. There is inductance associated with

the current-loop path inside of the capacitor. Turn the capacitor on

it's side so that the capacitor posts are perpendicular to the mounted

inductance, and the 'anti-resonant' peak will go away. This

anit-resonance is due to a parallel resonant circuit and behaves just

like the parallel resonant circuit formed by inductive capacitors

mounted on PCB power planes, but all inside of a single component.

regards,

Larry Smith

Sun Microsystems

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected] In

the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives

are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****

Istvan Novak Sun Microsystems, Inc.

[email protected] Workgroup Servers, BDT Group,

One Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803

Phone: (781) 442 0340

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected] In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****

**Next message:**Larry Smith: "Re: [SI-LIST] : RE: Capacitor Inductance"**Previous message:**[email protected]: "[SI-LIST] : RE: Capacitor Inductance"**Maybe in reply to:**Larry Smith: "[SI-LIST] : Capacitor Inductance (was: Comment on Johnson's article)"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:42 PST
*