RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise

From: [email protected]
Date: Mon Nov 08 1999 - 07:15:15 PST

• Next message: [email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise Part 2"
• Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"
• Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "[SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"
• Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"

'spread spectrum' in this case is a misnomer. Maybe it should read
'frequency modulation'

[email protected] on 11/08/99 09:22:24 AM

Please respond to [email protected]

To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise

Chris Cheng wrote:

> have u look into using spread spectrum clock source instead of crystals ?

Don't all the PLL's in chips these days make
spread spectrum clocking untenable?

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
[email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****

• Next message: [email protected]: "Re: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise Part 2"
• Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"
• Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "[SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"
• Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Micro Noise"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:42 PST