Re: [SI-LIST] : Comment on Johnson's article

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Lfresearch@aol.com
Date: Thu Nov 04 1999 - 04:38:21 PST


In a message dated 11/3/99 5:56:03 PM Central Standard Time,
howiej@sigcon.com writes:

> For this reason I don't usually
> seek capacitors with a super-low value of ESR. I stick
> with the cheap, cruddy, non-resonant kind of regular
> bypass capacitors (Z5U or equivalent) that don't harbor
> any resonant surprises.
>
> Best regards,
> Dr. Howard Johnson

I go along with this. I found on a larger device with four power pins ( they
were internally connected ) that caps with some loss to them performed
better. I put this down to them reducing "Current Sloshing" by adding some
loss into the network....

Anyone else seen this effect, found a better way to eliminate it?

Best regards,

Derek.

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:34 PST