From: Craig Twardy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Oct 21 1999 - 06:51:49 PDT
Ray Anderson wrote:
> email@example.com comments:
> > Does this mean ,for a given PCB size, I can increase the number of "points of consumption"
> > by a factor of 10 and maintain the same capacitance per "point of consumption"?
> Yeah, I think so, if I understand your question...
that's it, thanks.
> Yes it will. This can also introduce problems in that you will
> end up having the board resonate at lower frequencies that it would have with lower Er
> dielectrics. This can cause EMI concerns at lower frequencies
> than you might traditonally expect. Also, the board resonance effects
> will begin to move down towards the frequencies that one usually thinks
> of as being primarily of SI concern. This can cause all manner of interesting
> Actually it is an option today with some vendors offering alternate
> technologies in lieu of thin FR4. Half mil (or less) is in the realm
> of doability.
Can you provide vendor and/or product names?
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:17 PST