From: Heyfitch, Vadim (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Dec 16 1999 - 16:29:59 PST
It's my understanding that Ansoft's Maxwell does not creat any mesh
into the conductor bulk (or skin) when you are extracting AC values. Instead
it only creates the surfice mesh. Therefore there is no point in specifying
500 MHz instead of 100 MHz just to make sure that the is enough mesh layers
within the skin depth. Please correct me if this is a misconception on my
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim_Foppiano@Dell.com [mailto:Jim_Foppiano@Dell.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:18 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] : W element correlation with measured data
> I want to warn everyone that hspice is extremely sensitive to
> time step.
> The time step I used in the .sp file produced the results shown.
> If you vary time step you can get different answers. Also the
> meshing in Ansoft is sensitive to geometry. I specified frequencies
> of 100 MHz for the cable geometry and 500 MHz for the stripline
> geometry in order to avoid problems in skin depth meshing.
> Ansoft as well as any FE solver at some point may not be able to
> handle high Aspect ratios (thin wide conductors).
> Even a round conductor can start to look like a plane at sufficiently
> high a frequency in terms of skin depth.
> Jim Foppiano
> Signal Integrity
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
> firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put:
> UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:39:08 PST