Re: [SI-LIST] : IBIS Model Verification (correction)

Ray Anderson ([email protected])
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 11:24:16 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Parks: "[SI-LIST] : Priority of test pads"
Previous message: Kellee Crisafulli: "Re: [SI-LIST] : IBIS Model Verification (correction)"

So what if a user receives a commercial model that he/she believes is
defective in some way and notifies the model's developer of the fact?
Then the developer submits it for verification. Will this overload the
system? This would provide a single point of contact between the
developer and the verifier.

Granted, the model developer should have ensured model compliance
prior to releasing it to the user community, but at least this would/could
provide verification after the fact in problematic cases.

Ray Anderson
Sun Microsystems Inc.
>
>
> Hi Weston, Stephen,
>
> I need to modify a statement made by Stephen.
> The "Free" IBIS model review is NOT for CAE users. It was
> setup to assist model developers at the IC house with their
> models. We DO NOT have the bandwidth to check models submitted
> by users of all the CAE tools in the world.
> We DO have the bandwidth to check models submitted by the IC houses.
>
> If we had more volunteers we could expand this program into users.
> I suggest a user network be created powered by other users that
> volunteer. The "IBIS open user forum"
>
>

**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****

Next message: Tim Parks: "[SI-LIST] : Priority of test pads"
Previous message: Kellee Crisafulli: "Re: [SI-LIST] : IBIS Model Verification (correction)"