While I agree that the corner of the trace changes the cross sectional
we're talking about a section of the trace that's how long? 4 mils?
Remember that transmission line effects become evident only when the
delay time of the net is long compared to the signal's rise time. So
round trip delay across the bend in the trace compared to the rise time?
small, or so it seems to me.
As for antenna effects, remember that the signal's wavelength determines
the antenna needs to be to begin radiating. For a sine wave, lamba is
about 3 feet
at 300 MHz. If we assume that most of the energy in a 100 MHz square
wave is contained
in the first few harmonics, we might consider lamda/4 for a 300 MHz sine
wave as a
reasonable length for a good antenna. That's 9 inches.
I'm the first to agree that I'm talking about a <bold>good</bold>
antenna, that radiates a <bold>lot</bold>,
and that we don't want boards to radiate <bold>at all</bold>. Still,
most microstrip traces sit
mere mils above a reference plane, and serpentines are rarely more than
inch in length.
I suppose every little bit helps, but this one seems a stretch. Does
of any empirical data available?
At 01:17 PM 7/10/98 -0500, Mike Mayer wrote:
>I am puzzled by a design note on the Ultracad web site:
>It states that:
> THE REASON YOU DON'T USE RIGHT ANGLE TURNS ON CIRCUIT BOARDS IS
> THAT RIGHT ANGLE CORNERS BEGIN TO LOOK LIKE ANTENNAS.
>There are no references given or any further explanation. Can anyone
>explain what they mean?
>Mike Mayer Artesyn Communication Products,
> Madison, WI
>**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible
at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****