Re: [SI-LIST] : Modeling connector pin vias

Tat Hin Tan ([email protected])
Fri, 31 Oct 97 08:30:00 PST

Text item:

I'm not advertising for Tektronix but if u r looking for a
software tool to extract the parasitics for connector pin vias, I do
suggest IPA510 from Tektronix. It has powerful processing capabilities:
it can perform a deconvolution to remove the inherent ringing in the
step generated by the TDR, takes into account multiple reflections and
helps generate a lumped equivalent circuit model.

Tan Tat Hin
Intel Penang
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [SI-LIST] : Modeling connector pin vias
Author: [email protected] at SMTPGATE
Date: 10/29/97 10:26 AM

Item Subject: cc:Mail Text

I am interested in modeling vias for through-hole connector pins in a
multilayer controlled impedance board.

I have found that I get lower TDR impedances on bussed signal traces
routed to several connectors than for a simple test trace of the same
geometry. This is true even on a bare board with no connectors or
other components installed.

The lower impedance appears to be due to parasitic capacitance of the
feedthroughs and associated pads and PWR/GND planes. Signal rise times
in my application are about 1-1.5ns, so it seems reasonable to model
the vias as an excess lumped capacitance at the connector pin nodes.

My guess is that pin capacitance is a function of connector itself
(which the connector manufacturer may provide a model for), as well
PCB parameters such as thickness, number of layers (including PWR and
GND planes), pad size and clearance to plane layers.

Does anyone know of a calculation tool or formulas to get an
equivalent lumped via/pin capacitance I can use with a transmission
line simulator?

Also does anyone have experience with the technique of clearing a
rectangular region of metal in the PWR/GND layers around the connector
signal pins to reduce excess capacitance? In my application, which
uses differential signals, the increased impedance and loop area for
common mode GND currents should be less troublesome than for single
ended signals.

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.


Precedence: bulk
Sender: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SI-LIST] : Modeling connector pin vias
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 97 10:26:15 -0800
X-Openmail-Hops: 1
Received: from localhost by with SMTP
( 3.4 Openmail) id AA097109683; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:28:
03 -0800
Received: from ( [])
by (8.8.5/8.8.5tis) with ESMTP id KAA11512
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by saturn.Sun.C
OM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with ESMTP id KAA05904 for <[email protected]>;
Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:28:28 -0800
Received: from saturn.Sun.COM (saturn.EBay.Sun.COM [])
by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) with SMTP id KAA04831
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:29:06 -0800
From: [email protected]
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id KAA16741; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:30:25 -0800
Errors-To: [email protected]
Received: by (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id KAA16745; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:30:29 -0800
Received: from (silab.Eng.Sun.COM [])
by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) with SMTP id KAA22432;
Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:39:47 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.bya
ddr) with SMTP id KAA08438; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:46:53 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [])
by (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA24493;
Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by fmm (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA17040; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:51:10
-0800 (PST)
Return-Path: [email protected]