Re: pc board AC noisemap standards

Samie Samaan (Samie_Samaan@ccm.jf.intel.com)
Mon, 11 Mar 96 14:07:00 PST

Text item:

George,

If by "guidelines" you mean methodology for testing,then that's along
subject, which I do not have time to get into. But if you mean
specific numbers, then that is VERY Technology-specific for all four
points that you list. These (or some of these) numbers are usually
found in manufacturers' data books. Intel's do.


Samie Samaan
Intel, MD6

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: pc board AC noisemap standards
Author: George_Stevens@UB.com at SMTPGATE
Date: 3/11/96 1:21 PM

Hi folks,
I am currently involved in defining company signal integrity standards for
verification testing of prototype pc boards.
Due to the varied digital component technologies (ie ttl, cmos,ecl) used
accross the our product lines, I am attempting to
define TECHNOLOGY INDEPENDENT guidlines for such things as:
-positive/negative overshoot/undershoot
-setup/hold margins
-transition region glitches
-Vcc AC variations on component pins

Any of you signal integrity guru's have any suggestions or ideas for
references.????

Thanks for any info!!!

p.s. I review my si-list email everyday. I enjoy following the communications

between si-list members, but
find choosing the favorable viewpoint to be most challanging!! Keep
it coming.

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Content-Type: Text/Plain
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: pc board AC noisemap standards
Date: 11 Mar 96 14:24:29 EDT
From: George Stevens/UB Networks <George_Stevens@UB.com>
Cc: Jim Thrasivoulos/UB Networks <Jim_Thrasivoulos/UB_Networks@notes.UB.com>,
Goodarz
Goodarzi/UB Networks <Goodarz_Goodarzi/UB_Networks@notes.UB.com>
To: si-list <si-list@silab.Eng.Sun.COM>
Received: by UB (Lotus Notes Mail Gateway for SMTP V1.1) id
B523A057F1BA4A8C852562EA0068E697; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:23:08 EDT
Message-Id: <9603111923.AA9949@notes.UB.com>
Received: by notes.UB.com (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 1.3.2)/1.2)
id AA9949; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:23:09 -0800
Received: from notes.UB.com by ub-gate.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1[UB-1.9.1])
id AA20240; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:23:24 PST
Received: by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM)
id LAA21680; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:23:59 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.EBay.Sun.COM) by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.
3)
id AA12859; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:24:38 -0800
Errors-To: si-admin@silab.Eng.Sun.COM
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1) by silab.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA03465; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:25:09 PST
Received: from silab.Eng.Sun.COM (silab-188.Eng.Sun.COM) by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI
-5.3)
id AA11709; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:29:26 -0800
Received: by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM)
id NAA00830; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:17:12 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by hermes.intel.com (8.7.4/10.0i); Mon, 11 Mar 19
96 13:20:40 -0800
Received: from hermes.intel.com by ichips.intel.com (8.7.1/jIII); Mon, 11 Mar 19
96 13:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ichips.intel.com (ichips.intel.com [134.134.50.200]) by relay.jf.
intel.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA06759 for <Samie_Samaan@ccm2.jf.intel
.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:21:03 -0800
Return-Path: George_Stevens@UB.com