??????? .006" was using a high Er' dielectric??????
From: Chris Cheng [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] : Effect of low Zo for unterminated lines
are you sure you have a 29ohm line. its very hard to believe
you can achieve 29ohm with 6 mil traces on PCB.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Chris Bobek
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 5:24 PM
> To: Si-list
> Subject: [SI-LIST] : Effect of low Zo for unterminated lines
> Because of several constraints on our stackup and line width, a 6mil
> stripline trace yields a Zo = 29ohms. When I simulate a 29ohm,
> unterminated line on our board (@ 10MHz), I see a pretty nice waveform,
> albeit with slower rise/fall times (which is ok for the nets in
> question). When I increase the Zo to 60 ohms, for example, I see a lot
> of ringing on the same net.
> >From a theoretical point of view, my guess is that this happens because
> as you widen the trace, there is more capacitance, which slows down the
> rise/fall times. Is this a correct assumption? Are there other factors
> as well that are going on?
> What I am most concerned about is the effect of a low Zo net on its
> driver. For example, if I have an LVCH245 driver (3.3V) driving a 29ohm
> line, will the low Zo "hurt" the driver? Or, is the only negative
> effect the slower rise time? This question is a general question for
> most ICs.
> Thanks for your help,
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
> email@example.com. In the BODY of message put:
> UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives
> are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to
firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at