"D. C. Sessions" wrote:
> Adrian Shiner wrote:
> >
> > Surely all this data sheet spec rise & fall times info is becoming "foo dust" as switches become faster? The slew rate of a voltage waveform at a given point on a printed circuit, driven from a perfect switch (zero switch time)
> > depends solely on the current source/ sink capability of the generator being switched, its approximation to a current or voltage source and the circuit impedance.
>
> Not really. The output current doesn't go instantaneously from full-drive
> sink (or off) to full-drive source, so the output waveform isn't *entirely*
> a capacitive-charging curve. In fact (as we've been discussing) real loads
> are close to the real axis, so the I/T curve dominates.
>
> > Why don't the IC manufacturers defne the output driver broadly in line with the above?
>
> Actually, that's what too many do and what we've been griping about.
>
> --
> D. C. Sessions
> [email protected]
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****