R-L-C lumps are still appropriate for wire bonds, lead frames and peripherally
leaded packages, and they work well. But as solder bumps relaplace wire bonds,
solder balls replace peripheral leads and power plane packages replace
lead frame packages, the dominant parasitics are all distributed. They
are well represented by an impedance and delay. It is posible to represent
them with multiple lumps, but easier with transmission lines.
> I would also argue that an inductance matrix is the appropriate model for
> bond wires in just about any package that uses them. But Larry's right -
> once you get onto the substrate in something like a laminate BGA package
> you need transmission line analysis. Sometimes what you really need is
> coupled transmission line analysis where the cross-section varies as you
> move from the bond pad to the via. This is a difficult structure to
> accurately represent in a package model.
Yes, but that is why we have a mail reflector... and jobs also, come to
think about it.
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****