---Doug Brooks wrote:
> One last point. Is my assumption (below) correct? > > "Now if the distance between Cu atoms is about 1.3A, does that imply a > radius of a Cu atom of about .65A."
---I have to make a correction: the shortest distance in a Cu crystal is about 2.6A and therefore the (metallic) radius is about 1.3A (which differs not very much from the covalent radius).
Kind regrads,
Ch. Schuster
------------------------------------------------------------------- Christian Schuster, Dipl.-Phys. IIS, ETH Zurich Integrated Systems Laboratory Swiss Federal School of Technology Fax: +41 1 63 21194 Gloriastrasse 35 Phone: +41 1 63 27595 CH-8092 Zurich E-Mail: [email protected] Switzerland WWW: http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~schuster/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This mail reflects only my personal opinion. I do not guarantee for any results of using it.
**** To unsubscribe from si-list: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list ****