From: S. Weir (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 20:22:57 PDT
If the mfg really says that it is 3.3V tolerant, then take them at their
word. I would only ask them to clarify Iin @ 3.3V.
Your best alternative is probably a QuickSwitch device powered from the
3.3V rail. This will pinch the current flow towards the 2.5V device,
limiting the swing there to about 2.7V maximum. You will have to look at
the specific data sheets for the bus width that you want. On the 3.3V
side, the entire 2.5V swing will appear, so assuming it is 2.0V Vih max,
and your system isn't aggregiously noisy, you are set. You can get those
QuickSwitch devices in low resistance, about 3-7 ohms, or medium resistance
flavors, 25-35 ohms. Use the former for minimum timing impact, the latter
if you want series termination on one side.
At 08:28 PM 5/17/01 +0530, you wrote:
>Hello Everybody !
> I have an application where I have to interface a 3.3V LVTTL I/O
> with a 2.5
>V LVCMOS I/O. The 2.5V LVCMOS is claiming to be 3.3V tolerant. I have the
>Even if the manufacturer of the 2.5V claims that the device is 3.3 V
>tolerant, is it really advisable to subject it to 3.3V signals continuously
>? Will it have an adverse effects on the long term reliability of the device
> Do anybody has suggestions for devices which can do this 3.3V to 2.5V
>translation for a bi-directional bus.
>**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
>email@example.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
>si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
>si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:12:00 PDT